This article reports the effects of gender proportions on the task activity and socioemotional participation of men and women in 85 four-person, decision-making groups. The analysis focuses on the changes in the highest and lowest levels of male and female participation. Results show that role entrapment occurs for both male and female numerical minorities. Role entrapment is a function of conformity to gender expectations rather than gender-role exaggeration, and is not limited to the extreme of the token. Both men and women were affected by decreased numbers, but the effects were to the advantage of the men and to the disadvantage of the women.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, V. D.
and P. A. Thoits.1985. “Token Achievement: An Examination of Proportional Representation and Performance Outcomes.”Social Forces64:332-40.
2.
Allport, G. W.
1954. The Nature of Prejudice.New York: Addison Wesley.
3.
Aries, E.1976. “Interaction Patterns and Themes of Male, Female and Mixed Groups.”Small Group Behavior7:7-18.
4.
Bales, R. F.
and P. Slater. 1955. “Role Differentiation in Small Decision-Making Groups.” Pp. 250-306 in Family, Socialization and Interaction, edited by T. Parsons and R. F. Bales. New York: Free Press.
5.
Berger, J.
and B. P. Cohen, with M. M. Zelditch.1973. “Status Characteristics and Social Interaction.”American Sociological Review37:241-55.
6.
Berger, J.
and T. Conner, with M. Fisek. 1974. Expectations, States, Theory: A Theoretical Research Program.Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
7.
Blalock, H. M., Jr.1956. “Economic Discrimination and Negro Increase.”American Sociological Review21:584-88.
8.
Blalock, H. M., Jr.1957. “Percent Non-White and Discrimination in the South.”American Sociological Review22:677-82.
9.
Blalock, H. M., Jr.
1967. Toward a Theory of Minority-Group Relations.New York: John Wiley.
10.
Blau, P. M.
1977. Inequality and Heterogeneity.New York: Free Press.
11.
Blau, P. M.1980. “A Macrosociological Theory of Social Structure.”American Journal of Sociology83:26-54.
12.
Burke, P. J.1967. “The Development of Task and Socialemotional Role Differentiation.”Sociometry30:379-92.
13.
Burke, P. J.
1972. “Leadership Role Differentiation.” Pp. 514-546 in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by C. McClintock. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
14.
Cohen, E. G.
and S. S. Roper.1972. “Modification of Interracial Interaction Disability: An Application of Status Characteristics Theory.”American Sociological Review37:643-57.
15.
Floge, L
and D. Merrill.1986. “Tokenism Reconsidered: Male Nurses and Female Physicians in a Hospital Setting.”Social Forces64:925-47.
16.
Frank, H. H.
and A. H. Katcher.1977. “The Qualities of Leadership: How Male Medical Students Evaluate Their Female Peers.”Human Relations30:403-16.
17.
Kanter, R. M.
1977a. Men and Women of the Corporation.New York: Basic Books.
18.
Kanter, R. M.1977b. “Some Effects of Proportions in Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women.”American Journal of Sociology82:965-90.
19.
Kanter, R. M.
1977c. “Women in Organizations: Sex Roles, Group Dynamics, and Change Strategies.” Pp. 371-86 in Beyond Sex Roles, edited by A. Sargent. St. Paul, MN: West.
20.
Key, V. O.
1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation.New York: Knopf.
21.
Laws, J. Long.1975. “The Psychology of Tokenism: An Analysis.”Sex Roles1:51-67.
22.
Martin, P. Yancey
and K. A. Shanahan. 1983. “Transcending the Effects of Sex Composition in Small Groups.” Pp. 19-32 in Groupwork with Women/Groupwork with Men: An Overview of Gender Issues in Social Groupwork Practice, edited by B. G. Reed and C. D. Garvin. New York: Hayworth.
23.
Meeker, B. F.
and P. A. Weitzel-O'Neill.1977. “Sex Roles and Interpersonal Behavior in Task-Oriented Groups.”American Sociological Review42:91-105.
24.
Nie, N. C.et al.
1975. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences.New York: McGraw-Hill.
25.
Piliavin, J. A.
and R. R. Martin.1978. “The Effects of the Sex Composition of Groups on Style of Social Interaction.”Sex Roles4:218-96.
26.
Ridgeway, C. L.1982. “Status in Groups: The Importance of Motivation.”American Sociological Review47:76-88.
27.
Ruble, D. N.
and T. Higgins.1973. “Effects of Group Sex Composition of Self-Presentation and Sex-Typing.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology20:360-67.
28.
Simmel, G.
1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel, translated by K. H. Wolff. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
29.
South, S. J.
, C. Bonjean, W. Markham, and J. Corder.1982. “Social Structure and Intergroup Interaction.”American Sociological Review47:587-99.
30.
Toder, N. L.1980. “The Effect of the Sexual Composition of a Group on Discrimination Against Women and Sex-Role Attitudes.”Psychology of Women Quarterly5(2): 292-310.
31.
Wiley, M. G.
and A. Eskilson.1982. “Coping in the Corporation: Sex Role Constraints.”Journal of Applied Social Psychology12:1-11.
32.
Yoder, J. D.
and L. M. Sinnett.1985. “Is it All in the Numbers? A Case Study of Tokenism.”Psychology of Women Quarterly9:413-18.
33.
Yerby, J.1975. “Attitude, Task, and Sex Composition as Variables Affecting Female Leadership in Small Problem-Solving Groups.”Speech Monographs42:160-68.
