The purpose of the present study was to identify the sources of social support for feminist issues in Israel. Attitudes toward these issues as social problems and toward feminism as a social movement were examined through a questionnaire administered to 2,097 university students studying in the Tel Aviv area in 1985-1986. The study found that Israeli students who considered gender discrimination in promotion and prohibitions against abortion severe social problems were more likely to be on the political left, nonreligious or secular, and generally tolerant of difference and open to change. Support for the perception of violence against women as a social problem was stronger than for the other two issues and cut across the dominant cleavages in Israeli society. Students do not connect violence against women with gender inequality. These findings and their significance for the development of feminism in Israel are discussed within the framework of Gamson and Modigliani's (1987) analysis of the culture of policy issues.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amir, D.
and M. Amir.1979. “Rape Crisis Centers: An Arena for Ideological Conflict.”Victimology4:247-58.
2.
Arian, A.
and M. Shamir.1982“The Primarily Political Functions of the Left-Right Continuum.”Comparative Politics15:139-58.
3.
Arrington, T. S.
and P. A. Kyle.1978. “Equal Rights Amendment Activists in North Carolina.”Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society3:666-80.
4.
Bar Yosef, R.
, A. Bloom, and Z. Levy. 1977. Role-Ideology of Young Israeli Women.Jerusalem: Work and Welfare Research Institute, Hebrew University.
5.
Bareli, C.
and T. Benski. 1987. “Parents Against Silence.” Unpublished paper, Bar-Ilan University.
6.
Boneparth, E.
1982. “A Framework for Policy Analysis.” Pp. 1-16 in Power and Policy, edited by E. Boneparth. New York: Pergamon.
7.
Brady, D. W.
and K. L. Tedin.1976. “Ladies in Pink: Religion and Political Ideology in the Anti-ERA Movement.”Social Science Quarterly56:564-75.
8.
Burris, V.1983. “Who Opposed the ERA? An Analysis of the Social Bases of Antifeminism.”Social Science Quarterly64:305-17.
9.
Central Bureau of Statistics.
1986. Monthly Bulletin of Statistics. Supplement 37(4) Jerusalem.
10.
Commission on the Status of Women.
1978. Deliberations and Findings.Prime Minister's Office, Jerusalem (Hebrew).
11.
Dominguez, V. R.
1984. “The Language of Left and Right in Israeli Politics.” Pp. 89-109 in Political Anthropology: Cross-Currents in Israeli Culture and Politics, edited by M. J. Aronoff. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
12.
Gafni, Y. 1981. “The Readiness of Women and Men in Israel to Accept Top Management Positions.” Master's thesis, Bar-Ilan University, Department of Political Science (Hebrew).
13.
Gamson, W. A.
and A. Modigliani. 1987. “The Changing Culture of Affirmative Action.” Pp. 137-77 in Research in Political Sociology, edited by R. D. Braungart. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
14.
Ha'aretz. 1986. “Men Who Beat Their Wives.” Nov. 19. (Hebrew).
15.
Hafling, R.
1984. Career Patterns and Attitudes of Academic Women at the Hebrew University. Research report, Hebrew University, Jerusalem (Hebrew).
16.
Hubbard, J. C.
, M. L. DeFleur, and L. B. DeFleur.1975. “Mass Media Influences in Public Conceptions of Social Problems.”Social Problems23:22-34.
17.
Huber, J.
, C. Rextroat, and G. Spitze.1978. “A Crucible of Opinion on Women's Status: ERA in Illinois.”Social Forces57: 549-65.
18.
Izraeli, D. N.
1987. “The Status of Women in Israel Today.”Encyclopedia Judaica Yearbook.Jerusalem: Keter.
19.
Izraeli, D. N.
and E. Tabory.1986. “The Perception of Women's Status in Israel as a Social Problem.”Sex Roles14:663-78.
20.
Lissak, M.1983. “Ideological and Social Conflicts in Israel.”Jerusalem Quarterly29:20-37.
21.
McCarthy, J. D.
and M. N. Zald.1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.”American Journal of Sociology82:1212-41.
22.
Mueller, C.
and T. Dimieri.1982. “The Structure of Belief Systems Among Contending ERA Activists.”Social Forces60:657-75.
23.
Peres, Y.
and R. Katz. 1984. The Employed Mother and Her Family. Research report presented to the Ministry of Labor and Welfare, Jerusalem (Hebrew).
24.
Rokeach, M.
1960. The Open and Closed Mind.New York: Basic Books.
25.
Rose, V. M.1977. “Rape as a Social Problem: A Byproduct of the Feminist Movement.”Social Problems25:75-89.
26.
Sanger, S.et al.1972. “Dimensions of Internal-External Locus of Control and the Women's Liberation Movement.”Journal of Social Issues28:115-29.
27.
Shamir, M.
1987. “Realignment in Israel's Party System.” Pp. 267-96 in The Elections in Israel—1984, edited by A. Arian and M. Shamir. Tel Aviv: Ramot.
28.
Shamir, M.
and J. Sullivan.1983. “The Political Context of Tolerance: The United States and Israel.”American Political Science Review71:911-28.
29.
Shapira, R.
and H. Etzioni-Halevy. 1973. Who Are You: The Israeli Student?Tel-Aviv: Am Oved (Hebrew).
30.
Singleton, R., Jr.
and J. B. Christiansen.1977. “The Construct Validation of a Shortform Attitudes Toward Feminism Scale.”Social Science Review61:294-303.
31.
Smith, E. R.
, M. Marx Ferree, and F. M. Miller.1975. “A Short Scale of Attitudes Toward Feminism.”Representative Research in Social Psychology6:51-56.
32.
Spector, M.
and J. I. Kitsuse. 1977. Constructing Social Problems.Menlo Park, CA: Cummings.
33.
Tavris, C.1973. “Who Likes Women's Liberation—and Why? The Case of the Unliberated Liberals.”Journal of Social Issues29:175-98.
34.
Tedin, K. L.
, D. W. Brady, M. E. Buxton, B. M. Gorman, and J. L. Thompson.1977. “Social Backgrounds and Political Differences Between Pro- and Anti-ERA Activists.”American Politics Quarterly5:395-408.
35.
Tierney, K. J.1982. “The Battered Women Movement and the Creation of the Wife-Beating Problem.”Social Problems29:207-20.
36.
Welch, S.1975. “Support Among Women for the Issues of the Women's Movement.”Sociological Quarterly16:216-27.
37.
Whitehead, G. I., III
and S. L. Tawes.1976. “Dogmatism, Age and Educational Level as Correlates of Feminism.”Sex Roles2:401-5.
38.
Worell, J.
and L. Worrell.1977. “Support and Opposition to the Women's Liberation Movement: Some Personality and Parental Correlates.”Journal of Research in Personality11:10-20.
39.
Zemach, M.
1984 “Feminine at Work and Good at Home.”Naamat: Women at Work and in Society Monthly (Feb.-Mar.):14-23.
40.
Zemach, T.
and Z. Peled. 1983. The Public Image of the Status of Woman. Research report submitted to the Office of the Prime Minister' Advisor on the Status of Women, Jerusalem (Hebrew).
41.
Ziegler, I. 1980. “Abortions: The Dynamics of Attitudes, Laws, Politics and Policy Implementations.” Master's thesis, Haifa University, School of Social Work (Hebrew).
