TRANSCENDING BUREAUCRACY:

Abstract

Some feminists in the battered women's movement have been striving to develop egalitarian and participatory organizational structures for shelters. The Family Crisis Shelter offers a case study of a feminist shelter that is operating with a counterbureaucratic organizational structure. The shelter has a staff of nonprofessionals, makes all policy decisions through consensus, pays all staff the same wages, and imposes minimal regulations and restrictions on residents, who are encouraged to take initiative and make decisions. The article discusses the successes and limitations of the nonbureaucratic structure for implementing the feminist goals of consensus and empowerment.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahrens, L. 1978. “Battered Women's Refuges: Feminist Cooperatives vs. Social Service Institutions.” Aegis (Sept./Oct.):9-15.

Blau, P. and W. R. Scott. 1962. Formal Organizations. San Francisco: Chandler.

Carden, M. L. 1974. The New Feminists. New York: Russell Sage.

Ferguson, K. E. 1984. The Feminist Case Against Bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Ferraro, K. J. 1983. “Negotiating Trouble in a Battered Women's Shelter.” Urban Life 3:287-306.

Freeman, J. 1972-73. “The Tyranny of Structurelessness.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 17:151-64.

Friedman, C. L. 1987. “Pitfalls of Professionalism in the Battered Women's Movement.” National Coalition Against Domestic Violence Voice 17:151-64.

Glennon, L. 1979. Women and Dualism: A Sociology of Knowledge Analysis. New York: Longman.

Johnson, J. 1981. “Program Enterprise and Official Cooptation in the Battered Women's Shelter Movement.” American Behavioral Scientist 24:827-42.

10.

Loseke, D. R. and S. E. Cahill. 1984. “The Social Construction of Deviance: Experts on Battered Women.” Social Problems 31:296-310.

11.

Merton, R. K. 1971. “Insiders and Outsiders: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge.” American Journal of Sociology 78:9-47.

12.

Morgan, P. 1981. “From Battered Wife to Program Client: The State's Shaping of Social Problems.” Kapitalistate 9:17-39.

13.

Pahl, J. 1978. A Refuge for Battered Women: The Role of A Women's Center. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.

14.

Ridington, J. 1978. “The Transition Process: A Feminist Environment as Reconstructive Milieu.” Victimology 3-4:536-75.

15.

Rothschild-Whitt, J. 1982. “The Collectivist Organization: An Alternative to Bureaucratic Models.” Pp. 23-50 in Workplace Democracy and Social Change, edited by F. Lindenfeld and J. Rothschild-Whitt . Boston: Porter Sargent.

16.

Schechter, S. 1982. Women and Male Violence: The Visions and Struggles of the Battered Women's Movement. Boston: South End Press.

17.

Steinman, R. and D. M. Traunstein. 1976. “Redefining Deviance: The Self-Help Challenge to the Human Services.” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 12:347-61.

18.

Tierney, K. 1982. “The Battered Women's Movement and the Creation of the Wife Beating Problem.” Social Problems 29:207-20.

19.

Valentine A. 1987. “Credentials vs. Life Experience.” National Coalition Against Domestic Violence Voice (Summer):13-14.

20.

Weinstein, D. 1979. Bureaucratic Opposition. New York: Pergamon Press.