The emergence and growth of the comparable worth or pay-equity movement in the United States in the last six years signals a major shift in strategies for women's economic advancement—away from affirmative action strategies aimed at job integration, toward upgrading conditions for gender-segregated work itself. Although much has been written on comparable worth from technical and structural perspectives, my research explores a different set of questions. From qualitative research on two California localities, I ask what the issue represents to those involved and how they perceive their interests. As a political movement, comparable worth overcomes the narrow base of affirmative action. While building on the rising expectations affirmative action encouraged, comparable worth helps improve job conditions without attacking the gendered division of labor. However, comparable worth does not unite all women, it pits women against men of the same class, and may exacerbate the plight of women in the lowest level of the economy. Nevertheless, as an interim strategy, it is a worthy feminist goal, particularly as it addresses the concerns of working-class women.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amott, Teresa
and Julie Matthaei.1984. “Comparable Worth, Incomparable Pay: The Issue at Yale.”Radical America18(September-October):21-30.
2.
Beatty, Richard W.
and James R. Beatty. 1984. “Some Problems with Contemporary Job Evaluation Systems.” Pp. 59-78 in Comparable Worth and Wage Discrimination, edited by Helen Remick. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
3.
Beyette, Beverly.
1981. “Dispute in San Jose: Equal Pay for Comparable Worth.”Los Angeles Times, July 13.
4.
Bianchi, Suzanne
and Daphne Spain. 1983. American Women: Three Decades of Change.Special Demographic Analysis CD 3-80-8, August. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
5.
Bielby, William T.
and James N. Baron. 1984. “A Woman's Place Is with Other Women: Sex Segregation Within Organizations.” Pp. 27-55 in Sex Segregation in the Workplace: Trends, Explanations, Remedies, edited by Barbara F. Reskin. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6.
Blumrosen, Ruth G.1979. “Wage Discrimination, Job Segregation and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.”Michigan Journal of Law Reform12:399-502.
7.
Cain, Pamela Stone.
1985. “Prospects for Pay Equity in a Changing Economy.” Pp. 137-65 in Comparable Worth: New Directions For Research, edited by Heidi I. Hartmann. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8.
Carter, M. J.
and S. B. Carter.1981. “Women's Recent Progress in the Professions, or Women Get a Ticket to Ride After the Gravy Train Has Left the Station.”Feminist Studies7:477-504.
9.
Chodorow, Nancy.
1978. The Reproduction of Mothering.Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
City of San Jose.
1984. “Affirmative Action Plan,” December 6.
11.
Cook, Alice.
1980. “Collective Bargaining as a Strategy for Achieving Equal Opportunity and Equal Pay: Sweden and West Germany.” Pp. 53-78 in Equal Employment Policy For Women, edited by Ronnie Steinberg Ratner. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
12.
Davies, Margery.
1979. “Women's Place Is at the Typewriter.” Pp. 248-66 in Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case for Socialist Feminism, edited by Zillah Eisenstein. New York: Monthly Review Press.
13.
Donato, Katherine M.
1986. “Social and Economic Factors Governing the Changing Composition of Computer Specialties.” Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, New York.
14.
Eisenstein, Zillah R.
1981. The Radical Future of Liberal Feminism.New York: Longman.
15.
England, Paula.
1984. “Socioeconomic Explanations of Job Segregation.” Pp. 28-46 in Comparable Worth and Wage Discrimination, edited by Helen Remick. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
16.
Etzioni, Amitai
(ed.). 1969. The Semi-Professions and Their Organization.New York: Free Press.
17.
Farnquist, R. L.
, D. R. Armstrong, and R. P. Strausbaugh.1983. “Pandora's Worth: The San Jose Experience.”Public Personnel Management12:358-68.
18.
Feldberg, Roslyn.1984. “Comparable Worth: Toward Theory and Practice in the United States.”Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society10:311-28.
19.
Finney, Lee.
1986. Presentation to the Comparable Worth Project Conference, Laney College, Oakland, CA, April 12.
20.
Finney, Lee.
1983. “Closing the Wage Gap in Contra Costa County: Strategies for Action.” Unpublished report of the Contra Costa Comparable Worth Coalition, September 20.
21.
Flammang, Janet A.1985. “Female Officials in the Feminist Capital: The Case of Santa Clara County.”Western Political Quarterly38:94-118.
22.
Gilligan, Carol.
1982. In a Different Voice.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
Greer, William.
1986. “Women Gain a Majority in Jobs.”New York Times, March 19.
24.
Hacker, Sally.
1982. “Sex Stratification, Technological and Organizational Change: A Longitudinal Case Study of AT&T.” Pp. 248-66 in Women and Work: Problems and Perspectives, edited by R. Kahn-Hut, A. K. Daniels, and R. Colvard. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
Johansen, Elaine.
1984. Comparable Worth: The Myth and the Movement.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
26.
Johnston, David.1981. “Issues: Will They Lead the Way in San Jose?”Working Women6:162-65.
27.
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss.
1977. Men and Women of the Corporation.New York: Harper & Row.
28.
Kelley, Maryellen.1982. “Discrimination in Seniority Systems: A Case Study.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review36:40-55.
29.
Keppel, Bruce.
1981. “Equal Pay for Comparable Work: San Jose on New Ground in Women's Wage Debate.”Los Angeles Times, June 30.
30.
Kirp, David.
1985. “Comparable Worth: Take It Out of Courts”Los Angeles Times, September 9.
31.
Lawson, Carol.
1985. “Women in State Jobs Gain in Pay Equity.”New York Times, May 20.
32.
Massachusetts History Workshop. 1984. They Can't Run the Office Without Us: Sixty Years of Clerical Work.
33.
Milkman, Ruth. 1981. “The Reproduction of Job Segregation by Sex: A Study of the Changing Sexual Division of Labor in the Auto and Electrical Manufacturing Industries in the 1940's.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
34.
Milkman, Ruth.1976. “Women's Work and Economic Crisis: Some Lessons of The Great Depression.”Review of Radical Political Economics8:73-97.
35.
Moore, Richard
and Elizabeth Marsis.1983. “What's a Woman's Work Worth?”The Progressive47(December):20-22.
36.
Mueller, Carol.1985. “Comparable Worth in Santa Clara County.”Radcliffe Quarterly20(March):14-15.
37.
National NOW Times.
1987. “Mass NOW Leads All-Out Effort for Pay Equity.” 20(April):6.
38.
National NOW Times.
1986. “Pay Equity Gallops Across America in 1985.” 18(January):2.
39.
NCPENewsnotes. May 1985 and Summer 1986. Washington, DC: National Committee on Pay Equity.
40.
Nelson, Bruce A.
, E. M. Opton, Jr., and T. E. Wilson.1980. “Wage Discrimination and the Comparable Worth Theory in Perspective.”Michigan Journal of Law Reform13:233-301.
41.
New York Times.
1985. “Ruling on Pay Equity for Women Upset by Federal Court on Coast.” September 5.
42.
New York Times.
1984. “California Suit Charges Sex Discrimination on Pay.” November 22.
43.
Northrup, Herbert R.
1980. “Wage Setting and Collective Bargaining.” Pp. 107-36 in Comparable Worth: Issues and Alternatives, edited by Robert E. Livernash. Washington, DC: Equal Employment Advisory Council.
44.
Phipps, Polly A.
1986. “Occupational Resegregation: A Case Study of Insurance Adjusters, Examiners and Investigators.” Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, New York.
45.
Roos, Patricia
and Barbara Reskin. 1984. “Institutional Factors Contributing to Sex Segregation in the Workplace.” Pp. 235-60 in Sex Segregation in the Workplace: Trends, Explanations, Remedies, edited by B. Reskin. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
46.
Sacks, Karen B.
1986. “Women's Wages: Essential to Preserving Middle Income Jobs. The Telecommunications Industry Example.” Unpublished Report, Oberlin College.
47.
Schwab, Donald P.
1985. “Job Evaluation Research and Research Needs.” Pp. 37-52 in Comparable Worth: New Directions For Research, edited by Heidi I. Hartmann. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
48.
Serrin, William.
1984. “Women Still Working for Meager Pay.”Oakland Tribune, December 10.
49.
Smith, Joan.1984. “The Paradox of Women's Poverty: Wage-Earning Women and Economic Transformation.”Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society10:291-310.
50.
Steinberg, Ronnie.1986. “The Debate Over Comparable Worth.”New Politics1:108-24.
51.
Treiman, Donald J.
1984. “Effect of Choice of Factors and Factor Weights in Job Evaluation.” Pp. 79-89 in Comparable Worth and Wage Discrimination, edited by Helen Remick. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
52.
Treiman, Donald J.
and Heidi I. Hartmann (eds.). 1981. Women, Work and Wages: Equal Pay for Jobs of Equal Value.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
53.
Turner, Wallace.
1986. “Drive Seen as Gaining Pay Equity for Women.”New York Times, January 27.
54.
U.S. Department of Labor.
1983. Time of Change: 1983 Handbook on Women Workers.Women's Bureau, Bulletin 298.Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
55.
Van Beers, Lois B. 1981. “The Effects of Implementing Comparable Worth Pay Criteria in the City of San Jose.” Unpublished master's thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
56.
Wharton, Amy S. 1984. “Blue Collar Segregation: A Demand-Side Analysis.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
57.
Wilson, William J.
1978. The Declining Significance of Race.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
