Is maleness as durable a social classification as femaleness? Theories of gender suggest that men’s dominance in the gender hierarchy affords them greater privileges than women, whereas theories of status predict that men would be subject to greater scrutiny precisely because they occupy a higher-status position. We interrogate the nature of gender categories themselves by examining which theories hold in the context of gender nonconformity. Using a nationally representative survey experiment, we examine how a child’s sex assigned at birth affects their likelihood of being reclassified as transgender for engaging in gender-nonconforming behavior. We find that people are more likely to reclassify boys exhibiting feminine behavior into an alternative identity category (transgender) than girls exhibiting analogous masculine behavior. Thus, membership in the “male” category is more fragile than in the “female” category. These findings suggest that gender nonconformity is itself a gendered process, and that the durability of membership in a social category depends on the status of that social identity. This study provides the first causal evidence of the effect of gender nonconformity on perceptions of both transgender and homosexual identity.
AbascalMaria. 2015. Us and them: Black-White relations in the wake of Hispanic population growth. American Sociological Review80 (4): 789–813.
2.
AbascalMaria. 2020. Contraction as a response to group threat: Demographic decline and Whites’ classification of people who are ambiguously White. American Sociological Review85 (2): 298–322.
3.
BertrandMarianneMullainathanSendhil. 2004. Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review94 (4): 991–1013.
4.
BlumerHerbert. 1980. Mead and Blumer: The convergent methodological perspectives of social behaviorism and symbolic interactionism. American Sociological Review45 (3): 409–19.
5.
BossonJennifer K.VandelloJoseph A.BurnafordRochelle M.WeaverJonathan R.WastiS. Arzu. 2009. Precarious manhood and displays of physical aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin35 (5): 623–34.
6.
BridgesTristanPascoeC. J.2014. Hybrid masculinities: New directions in the sociology of men and masculinities. Sociology Compass8 (3): 246–58.
7.
BrillStephaniePepperRachel. 2008. The transgender child: A handbook for families and professionals. San Francisco: Cleis Press.
8.
BrubakerRogers. 2016. Trans: Gender and race in an age of unsettled identities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9.
ButlerJudith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
10.
ConnellR. W.1987. Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
11.
CorrellShelley J.2004. Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations. American Sociological Review69 (1): 93–113.
12.
CorrellShelley J.RidgewayCecilia L.2003. Expectation states theory. In The handbook of social psychology, edited by DelamaterJohn. New York: Kluwer Academic.
13.
DavisF. James. 1991. Who is black? One nation’s definition. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
14.
DoanLongQuadlinNatashaPowellBrian. 2019. Americans’ perceptions of transgender people’s sex: Evidence from a national survey experiment. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World5:1–15.
15.
EhrensaftDiane. 2011. Gender born, gender made: Raising healthy gender-nonconforming children. New York: The Experiment.
16.
FoschiMartha. 2000. Double standards for competence: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology26:21–42.
17.
GerberAlan S.GreenDonald P.2012. Field experiments: Design, Analysis, and interpretation. New York: W.W. Norton.
18.
GoffmanErving. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.
JohnsonKerri L.FreemanJonathan B.PaukerKristin. 2012. Race is gendered: How covarying phenotypes and stereotypes bias sex categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology102 (1): 116–31.
21.
KaneEmily. 2006. “No way my boys are going to be like that!” Parents’ responses to children’s gender nonconformity. Gender & Society20 (2): 149–76.
22.
Katz-WiseSabra L.RosarioMargaretTsappisMichael. 2016. Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth and family acceptance. Pediatric Clinics of North America63 (6): 1011–25.
23.
LagosDanya. 2019. Hearing gender: Voice-based gender classification processes and transgender health inequality. American Sociological Review84 (5): 801–27.
24.
LeiRyan F.LeshinRachel A.RhodesMarjorie. 2020. The development of intersectional social prototypes. Psychological Science31 (8): 911–26.
25.
MartinKarin A.1998. Becoming a gendered body: Practices of preschools. American Sociological Review63 (4): 494–511.
26.
MeadowTey. 2010. “A rose is a rose”: On producing legal gender classifications. Gender & Society24 (6): 814–37.
27.
MeadowTey. 2017. Whose chosenness counts? The always-already racialized discourse of trans. Ethnic and Racial Studies40 (8): 1306–11.
28.
MeadowTey. 2018. Trans kids: Being gendered in the twenty-first century. Oakland: University of California Press.
29.
MesserschmidtJames W.2009. “Doing gender”: The impact and future of a salient sociological concept. Gender & Society23 (1): 85–88.
30.
MeyerowitzJoanne. 2002. How sex changed: A history of transsexuality in the United States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
31.
MizeTrenton D.ManagoBianca. 2018. Precarious sexuality: How men and women are differentially categorized for similar sexual behavior. American Sociological Review83 (2): 305–30.
32.
MunschChristin L.2016. Flexible work, flexible penalties: The effect of gender, childcare, and type of request on the flexibility bias. Social Forces94 (4): 1567–91.
33.
PascoeC. J.2005. “Dude, you’re a fag”: Adolescent masculinity and the fag discourse. Sexualities8 (3): 329–46.
34.
PascoeC. J.2007. Dude, you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. Berkeley: University of California Press.
35.
QuadlinNatasha. 2018. The mark of a woman’s record: Gender and academic performance in hiring. American Sociological Review83 (2): 331–60.
36.
RidgewayCecilia L.2019. Status: Why is it everywhere? Why does it matter?New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
37.
RidgewayCecilia L.CorrellShelley J.2004. Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society18 (4): 510–31.
38.
RyanCaitlinRussellStephen T.HeubnerDavidDiazRafaelSanchezJorge. 2010. Family acceptance in adolescence and the health of LGBT young adults. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing23 (4): 205–14.
39.
Savin-WilliamsRitch C.DiamondLisa M.2000. Sexual identity trajectories among sexual-minority youths: Gender comparisons. Archives of Sexual Behavior29 (6): 607–27.
40.
SchiltKristen. 2010. Just one of the guys? Transgender men and the persistence of gender inequality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
SchiltKristenWestbrookLauren. 2009. Doing gender, doing heteronormativity: “Gender normals,” transgender people, and the social maintenance of heterosexuality. Gender & Society23 (4): 440–64.
42.
SedgwickEve Kosofsky. 1993. How to bring your kids up gay. In Fear of a queer planet: Queer politics and social theory, edited by WarnerMichael. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.
43.
SeranoJulia. 2007. Whipping girl: A transsexual woman on sexism and the scapegoating of femininity. Berkeley: Seal Press.
44.
SimmelGeorg. 1955. Conflict and the web of group-affiliations. Translated by Kurt H. Wolff and Reinhard Bendix. New York: Free Press.
45.
SnortonC. RileyHaritawornJin. 2013. Trans necropolitics: A transnational reflection on violence, death and the trans of color afterlife. In The transgender studies reader2, edited by StrykerSusanAizuraAren Z.New York: Routledge.
StaceyLawrence. 2022. (Bio)logics of the family: Gender, biological relatedness, and attitudes toward children’s gender nonconformity in a vignette experiment. Sociological Forum37 (1): 222–45.
ThorneBarrie. 1993. Gender play: Girls and boys in school. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
50.
TraversAnn. 2018. The trans generation: How kids (and their parents) are creating a gender revolution. New York: New York University Press.
51.
ValentineDavid. 2007. Imagining transgender: An ethnography of a category. Durham: Duke University Press.
52.
Van BuurenStef. 2018. Flexible imputation of missing data. 2nd ed.New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
53.
WardJane. 2010. Gender labor: Transmen, femmes, and collective work of transgression. Sexualities13 (2): 236–54.
54.
WarnerMichael. 1991. Introduction: Fear of a queer planet. Social Text29:3–17.
55.
WeinbergJill D.FreeseJeremyMcElhattanDavid. 2014. Comparing data characteristics and results of an online factorial survey between a population-based and a crowdsource-recruited sample. Sociological Science1:292–310.
WestbrookLaurel. 2020. Unlivable lives: Violence and identity in transgender activism. Oakland: University of California Press.
58.
WestbrookLaurelSchiltKristen. 2014. Doing gender, determining gender: Transgender people, gender panics, and the maintenance of the sex/gender/sexuality system. Gender & Society28 (1): 32–57.
59.
WillerRobbRogalinChristabel L.ConlonBridgetWojnowiczMichael T.2013. Overdoing gender: A test of the masculine overcompensation thesis. American Journal of Sociology118 (4): 980–1022.
60.
ZerubavelEviatar. 1998. Language and memory: “Pre-Columbian” America and the social logic of periodization. Social Research65 (2): 315–30.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
