Despite growing concerns that parental leave policies may reinforce the marginalization of mothers in the labor market and reproduce the gendered division of household labor, few studies examine how women themselves approach and use parental leave. Through 64 in-depth interviews with college-educated Korean mothers, we find that although women’s involvement in family responsibilities increases during leave, they do not reduce their work devotion but reinvent it throughout the leave-taking process. Embedded in the culture of overwork in Korean workplaces, women find it justifiable to use leave only when they are highly committed to work and adjust the length of leave to accommodate workplace demands. Upon returning to work, they try to compensate for their absence by working harder than before, thereby showing that they are more committed than their colleagues. Given this “compensatory” work devotion, women question their own entitlement in the workplace, and some quit when they cannot meet their goal of compensating by doing more than others. This study highlights how the workplace culture shapes women’s work devotion during and after leave.
AckerJoan. 1990. Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society4 (2): 139–58.
2.
AnMi Young. 2018. Gender division of childcare and the social investment approach to welfare state in South Korea. Korean Journal of Child Studies39 (4): 129–38.
3.
BergmannBarbara R.2008. Long leaves, child well-being, and gender equality. Politics & Society36 (3): 350–59.
4.
BianchiSuzanne M.RobinsonJohn P.MilkieMelissa A.2006. The changing rhythms of American family life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
5.
BielbyDenise D.BielbyWilliam T.1988. She works hard for the money: Household responsibilities and the allocation of work effort. American Journal of Sociology93 (5): 1031–59.
6.
Blair-LoyMary. 2003. Competing devotions: Career and family among women executives. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
7.
BoeckmannIreneMisraJoyaBudigMichelle J.2015. Cultural and institutional factors shaping mothers’ employment and working hours in postindustrial countries. Social Forces93 (4): 1301–33.
8.
BrintonMary C.MunEunmi. 2016. Between state and family: Managers’ implementation and evaluation of parental leave policies in Japan. Socio-Economic Review14 (2): 257–81.
9.
BrintonMary C.OhEunsil. 2019. Babies, work, or both? Highly educated women’s employment and fertility in East Asia. American Journal of Sociology125 (1): 105–40.
10.
CechErin A.Blair-LoyMary. 2014. Consequences of flexibility stigma among academic scientists and engineers. Work and Occupations41 (1): 86–110.
11.
ChinMeejungLeeJaerimLeeSoyoungSonSeoheeSungMiai. 2012. Family policy in South Korea: Development, current status, and challenges. Journal of Child and Family Studies21 (1): 53–64.
12.
CollinsCaitlyn. 2019. Making motherhood work: How women manage careers and caregiving. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
13.
CorbinJuliet M.StraussAnselm. 1990. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology13 (1): 3–21.
14.
DamaskeSarah. 2011. For the family: How class and gender shape women’s work. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
DragoRobertColbeckCarol L.StaufferKai DawnPirrettiAmyBurkumKurtFazioliJenniferLazzaroGabrielaHabasevichTara. 2006. The avoidance of bias against caregiving: The case of academic faculty. American Behavioral Scientist49 (9): 1222–47.
16.
ElyRobin J.MeyersonDebra E.2010. An organizational approach to undoing gender: The unlikely case of offshore oil platforms. Research in Organizational Behavior30:3–34.
17.
EpsteinCynthia FuchsSeronCarrollOglenskyBonnieSautéRobert. 1999. The part-time paradox: Time norms, professional life, family and gender. New York: Routledge.
18.
EvertssonMarieDuvanderAnn-Zofie. 2011. Parental leave—Possibility or trap? Does family leave length effect Swedish women’s labour market opportunities?European Sociological Review27 (4): 435–50.
19.
FriedMindy. 1998. Taking time: Parental leave policy and corporate culture. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
20.
GaltryJudithCallisterPaul. 2005. Assessing the optimal length of parental leave for child and parental well-being: How can research inform policy?Journal of Family Issues26 (2): 219–46.
21.
GanglMarkusZiefleAndrea. 2009. Motherhood, labor force behavior, and women’s careers: An empirical assessment of the wage penalty for motherhood in Britain, Germany, and the United States. Demography46 (2): 341–69.
22.
GersonKathleenDamaskeSarah. 2021. The science and art of interviewing. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
GlassChristyFodorÉva. 2011. Public maternalism goes to market: Recruitment, hiring, and promotion in postsocialist Hungary. Gender & Society25 (1): 5–26.
24.
GlassJennifer. 2004. Blessing or curse? Work-family policies and mother’s wage growth over time. Work and Occupations31 (3): 367–94.
25.
GornickJanet C.MeyersMarcia K.2003. Families that work: Policies for reconciling parenthood and employment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
26.
HegewischArianeGornickJanet C.2011. The impact of work-family policies on women’s employment: A review of research from OECD countries. Community, Work & Family14 (2): 119–38.
27.
HookJennifer L.2006. Care in context: Men’s unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965–2003. American Sociological Review71 (4): 639–60.
28.
JacobsJerry A.GersonKathleen. 2004. The time divide: Work, family, and gender inequality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
29.
JanusAlexander L.2013. The gap between mothers’ work-family orientations and employment trajectories in 18 OECD countries. European Sociological Review29 (4): 752–66.
JudieschMichael K.LynessKaren S.1999. Left behind? The impact of leaves of absence on managers’ career success. Academy of Management Journal42 (6): 641–51.
32.
KellyErin L.MoenPhyllisTranbyEric. 2011. Changing workplaces to reduce work-family conflict: Schedule control in a white-collar organization. American Sociological Review76 (2): 265–90.
33.
KmecJulie A.2011. Are motherhood penalties and fatherhood bonuses warranted? Comparing pro-work behaviors and conditions of mothers, fathers, and non-parents. Social Science Research40 (2): 444–59.
34.
KoJae-Young. 2007. The South Korean experience in economic development. In Making world development work: Scientific alternatives to neoclassical economic theory, edited by LeclercGrégoireA. S. HallCharles. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
LeeJooheeCheonByung You. 2009. Career aspirations of women in corporate management: The case of South Korea. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies15 (3): 60–80.
37.
LovejoyMegStonePamela. 2012. Opting back in: The influence of time at home on professional women’s career redirection after opting out. Gender, Work and Organization19 (6): 631–53.
38.
MorganKimberly J.ZippelKathrin. 2003. Paid to care: The origins and effects of care leave policies in western Europe. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society10 (1): 49–85.
39.
MunEunmiBrintonMary C.2015. Workplace matters: The use of parental leave policy in Japan. Work and Occupations42 (3): 335–69.
40.
MunschChristin L.RidgewayCecilia L.WilliamsJoan C.2014. Pluralistic ignorance and the flexibility bias: Understanding and mitigating flextime and flexplace bias at work. Work and Occupations41 (1): 40–62.
41.
OlivettiClaudiaPetrongoloBarbara. 2017. The economic consequences of family policies: Lessons from a century of legislation in high-income countries. Journal of Economic Perspectives31 (1): 205–30.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. 2017. Report on the implementation of the OECD gender recommendations: Some progress on gender equality but much left to do. https://www.oecd.org/mcm/documents/C-MIN-2017-7-EN.pdf.
PettitBeckyHookJennifer L.2009. Gendered tradeoffs: Family, social policy, and economic inequality in twenty-one countries. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
46.
ReidErin. 2015. Embracing, passing, revealing, and the ideal worker image: How people navigate expected and experienced professional identities. Organization Science26 (4): 997–1017.
47.
RuhmChristopher J.1998. The economic consequences of parental leave mandates: Lessons from Europe. Quarterly Journal of Economics113 (1): 285–317.
StonePamela. 2007. Opting out: Why women really quit careers and head home. Berkeley: University of California Press.
51.
StonePamelaHernandezLisa Ackerly. 2013. The all-or-nothing workplace: Flexibility stigma and “opting out” among professional-managerial women. Journal of Social Issues69 (2): 235–56.
WaldfogelJane. 1999. The impact of the Family and Medical Leave Act. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management18 (2): 281–302.
54.
WeedenKim A.2005. Is there a flexiglass ceiling? Flexible work arrangements and wages in the United States. Social Science Research34 (2): 454–82.
55.
WhartonAmy S.ChiversSarahBlair-LoyMary. 2008. Use of formal and informal work-family policies on the digital assembly line. Work and Occupations35 (3): 327–50.
56.
WhitehouseGillianHoskingAmandaBairdMarian. 2008. Returning too soon? Australian mothers’ satisfaction with maternity leave duration. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources46 (3): 288–302.
57.
WilliamsJoan C.2000. Unbending gender: Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. New York: Oxford University Press.
58.
WilliamsJoan C.Blair-LoyMaryBerdahlJennifer L.2013. Cultural schemas, social class, and the flexibility stigma. Journal of Social Issues69 (2): 209–34.
59.
WynnAlison T.RaoAliya Hamid. 2020. Failures of flexibility: How perceived control motivates the individualization of work-life conflict. ILR Review73 (1): 61–90.
