Several initiatives recognize the importance of transforming institutions, not just changing individuals, to diversify STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) fields. Universities and colleges are distinctive gendered work organizations because workers (faculty) are highly educated and have authority in hiring, evaluation, and policy (shared governance). This article explores whether feminist sociologists are particularly well suited to guide institutional change to diversify the academy. Drawing on data from in-depth interviews with 24 feminist academic sociologists at the rank of associate or full professor, I analyze how their feminist and sociological identities intersect with institutional locations to create opportunities to transform the academy. Outsiders within, feminist sociologists revise and use the master’s tools to produce knowledge that improves recognition of, and ability to reduce, structural inequalities. Proficiency with these tools confers insider legitimacy and access to a “seat at the table” where disciplinary expertise and political commitments contribute to institutional change. Inevitably, these professors confront resistance, and in response develop strategies to advance their goals. Insights from feminist sociologists suggest that to transform universities to reflect the diversity of institutions and lived reality of contemporary faculty, it may be more useful to identify a set of commitments and principles that inform policies and practices, rather than specifying actions to support culture change.
AckerJoan. 1990. Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society4 (2): 139–58.
2.
AckerJoan. 2006. Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society20 (4): 441–64.
3.
AhmedSara. 2017. Living a feminist life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4.
ArdoinSonjaBroadhurstChristopherLockeLeslieJohnsonJaime. 2019. Peacemakers and rabble rousers: Women leaders as activists in higher education. Journal of Women and Gender in Higher Education12 (1): 35–53.
5.
BattilanaJulieLecaBernardBoxenbaumEva. 2009. How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals3 (1): 65–107.
6.
BielbyWilliam T.BaronJames N.1987. Undoing discrimination: Job integration and comparable worth. In Ingredients for Women’s Employment Policy, edited by BoseChrisSpitzGlenna. Albany: SUNY Press.
7.
BirdSharon R.2011. Unsettling universities’ incongruous, gendered bureaucratic structures: A case-study approach. Gender, Work & Organization18 (2): 202–30.
8.
BrittonDana M.2000. The epistemology of the gendered organization. Gender & Society14 (3): 418–34.
9.
BrittonDana M.2017. Beyond the chilly climate: The salience of gender in women’s academic careers. Gender & Society31 (1): 5–27.
10.
BurghardtDeborah A.ColbeckCarol L.2005. Women’s studies faculty at the intersection of institutional power and feminist values. Journal of Higher Education76 (3): 301–30.
11.
BurnettCathleen. 2003. Passion through the profession: Being both activist and academic. Social Justice30 (4): 135–50.
CollinsDonald Earl. 2005. The ivory tower and scholar-activism. Academe91 (5): 26–28.
14.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 1986. Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black feminist thought. Social Problems33 (6): S14–S32.
15.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 2013. On intellectual activism. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
16.
CookClarissaWattersMalcolm. 1998. The impact of organizational form on gendered labour markets in engineering and law. Sociological Review46 (2): 314–39.
17.
DavidMiriam E.2014. Feminism, gender and universities: Politics, passion and pedagogies. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
18.
De WeldeKristineStepnickAndi, eds. 2015. Disrupting the culture of silence: Confronting gender inequality and making change in higher education. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
19.
DiMaggioPaul J.1988. Interest and agency in institutional theory. In Institutional patterns and organizations: culture and organizations, edited by ZuckerLynne G.Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
20.
FergusonKathy E.1984. The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
21.
FoxMary Frank. 2008. Institutional transformation and the advancement of women faculty: the case of academic science and engineering. In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. 23, edited by SmartJohn C.Dordrecht: Springer.
22.
FoxMary Frank. 2015. Gender and clarity of evaluation among academic scientists in research universities. Science, Technology, & Human Values40 (4): 487–515.
Gutiérrez y MuhsGabriellaYolanda Flores Niemann, Carmen G. González, Angela P. Harris, eds.2012. Presumed incompetent: The intersections of race and class for women in academia. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
HartJeni. 2008. Mobilization among women academics: The interplay between feminism and professionalization. National Women’s Studies Association (NWSA) Journal20 (1): 184–208.
27.
HartJeni. 2009. Creating faculty activism and grassroots leadership: An open letter to aspiring activists. In Rethinking leadership in a complex, multicultural, and global environment: New concepts and models for higher education, edited by KezarAdrianna. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
28.
Hesse-BiberSharlene Nagy. 2017. The practice of qualitative research, 3rd edition.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
HillPatricia WonchHolmesMary AnneMcquillanJulia. 2014. The new STEM faculty profile: Balancing family and dual careers. In Gender transformation in the academy, edited by DemosVasilikieBerheideCatherine WhiteSegalMarcia Texler. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
30.
JenkinsKatharine. 2014. “That’s not philosophy”: Feminism, academia and the double bind. Journal of Gender Studies23 (3): 262–74.
31.
KatzensteinMary Fainsod. 1998. Faithful and fearless: Moving feminist protest inside the church and military. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
KezarAdriannaGallantTricia BertramLesterJaime. 2011. Everyday people making a difference on college campuses: the tempered grassroots leadership tactics of faculty and staff. Studies in Higher Education36 (2): 129–51.
33.
LaubeHeather. 2010. “It’s part of my being”: Demand making and discursive protest by feminist sociologists inside academia. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change30:3–41.
34.
LordeAudre. 1984. The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house. In Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Berkeley, CA: Crossing Press.
35.
Messer-DavidowEllen. 1991. Know-how. In (En)gendering knowledge: Feminists in academe, edited by HartmanJoan E.Messer-DavidowEllen. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
36.
MeyersonDebraTompkinsMegan. 2007. Tempered radicals as institutional change agents: The case of advancing gender equity at the University of Michigan. Harvard Journal of Law & Gender30 (2): 303–22.
37.
MillsC. Wright. 1959. The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
MisraJoyaLundquistJennifer HickesHolmesElissaAgiomavritisStephanie. 2011. The ivory ceiling of service work. Academe97 (1): 22–26.
39.
MorimotoShauna A.ZajicekAnna. 2014. Dismantling the “master’s house”: Feminist reflections on institutional transformation. Critical Sociology40 (1): 135–50.
40.
OllilainenMarjukkaSolomonCatherine Richards. 2014. Carving a “third path”: Faculty parents’ resistance to the ideal academic worker norm. In Gender transformation in the academy, edited by DemosVasilikieBerheideCatherine WhiteSegalMarcia Texler. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
41.
ParsonsElizabethPriolaVincenza. 2013. Agents for change and changed agents: The micro-politics of change and feminism in the academy. Gender, Work & Organization20 (5): 580–98.
42.
RhotonLaura A.2011. Distancing as a gendered barrier: Understanding women scientists’ gender practices. Gender & Society25 (6): 696–716.
43.
RismanBarbara J.AdkinsTimothy. 2014. The goal of gender transformation in American universities: Toward social justice for women in the academy. In Social Justice and the University: Globalization, human rights, and the future of democracy, edited by ShefnerJonDahmsHarry F.JonesRobert EmmetJalataAsafa. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
44.
RosenbergKaren EstherHowardJudith A.2008. Finding feminist sociology: A review essay. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society33 (3): 675–96.
45.
SafarikLynn. 2003. Feminist transformation in higher education: Discipline, structure, and institution. Review of Higher Education26 (4): 419–45.
46.
SingletonRoyce A.Jr.StraitsBruce C.StraitsMargaret Miller. 1993. Approaches to Social Research. 2nd Edition.New York: Oxford University Press.
47.
SkeggsBeverley. 2008. The dirty history of feminism and sociology: Or the war of conceptual attrition. Sociological Review56 (4): 670–90.
48.
SmithDorothy E.1974. Women’s perspective as a radical critique of sociology. Sociological Inquiry44 (1): 7–13.
49.
SpragueJoey. 1997. Holy men and big guns: The can[n]on in social theory. Gender & Society11 (1): 88–107.
StewartAbigail J.ValianVirginia. 2018. An inclusive academy: Achieving diversity and excellence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52.
TherbornGöran. 1980. The ideology of power and the power of ideology. London: Verso.
53.
Underhill-SemYvonne Te Ruki-Rangi-O-Tangaroa. 2017. Academic work as radical practice: Getting in, creating a space, not giving up. Geographical Research55 (3): 332–37.
54.
ValianVirginia. 1999. Why so slow? The advancement of women. Revised edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55.
WootenMelissa E.BranchEnobong H.2012. Defining appropriate labor: Race, gender, and idealization of black women in domestic service. Race, Gender & Class19 (3–4): 292–308.
56.
WynnAlison T.2020. Pathways toward change: Ideologies and gender equality in a Silicon Valley technology company. Gender & Society34 (1): 106–30.
