Gender scholars argued that gendered organizations theory needs updating as organizational logic has shifted amid neoliberal workplace transformations. This qualitative case study of a high-tech firm reveals how features of the traditional work logic remain resilient. I analyze the gendered implications of a high-tech startup restructuring and going public, finding the flexible organization to bureaucratize, implementing specialized jobs and a hierarchy with standardized career ladders. Going public creates conflicting gendered logics that place women at a structural disadvantage, relegating them to low-status, narrow jobs while simultaneously demanding masculine ideal worker norms of visibility and self-promotion. Despite networking, women experience job insecurity and a glass ceiling, while men are assumed ideal workers and advance. By tracing one high-tech firm’s restructuring from a startup to public company, I demonstrate how the collision of new and traditional workplace logics perpetuates gender inequalities.
AckerJoan. 1990. Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society4 (2): 139-58.
2.
AckerJoan. 1992. From sex roles to gendered institutions. Contemporary Sociology21 (5): 565-69.
3.
AckerJoan. 2006a. Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society20 (4): 441-64.
4.
AckerJoan. 2006b. Gender and organizations. In Handbook of the sociology of gender, edited by ChafetzJanet Saltzman. Boston, MA: Springer.
5.
AlfreyLaurenTwineFrance Winddance. 2017. Gender-fluid geek girls: Negotiating inequality regimes in the tech industry. Gender & Society31 (1): 28-50.
6.
ArthurMichael B.1994. The boundaryless career: A new perspective for organizational inquiry. Journal of Organizational Behavior15 (4): 295-306.
7.
AshcraftCatherineBlitheSarah. 2010. Women in IT: The facts. Boulder, CO: National Center for Women & Information Technology.
8.
BarleyStephen R.KundaGideon. 2004. Gurus, hired guns, and warm bodies: Itinerant experts in a knowledge economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
BaronJames N.HannanMichael T.HsuGretaKoçakÖzgecan. 2007. In the company of women: Gender inequality and the logic of bureaucracy in start-up firms. Work and Occupations34 (1): 35-66.
10.
BenardStephenCorrellShelley J.2010. Normative discrimination and the motherhood penalty. Gender & Society24 (5): 616-46.
11.
BennerKatie. 2017. A backlash builds against sexual harassment in Silicon Valley. New York Times, 3July.
12.
BiernackiPatrickWaldorfDan. 1981. Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods and Research10:141-63.
13.
BrittonDana M.2017. Beyond the chilly climate: The salience of gender in women’s academic careers. Gender & Society31 (1): 5-27.
BrodyCharlesRubinBeth A.2011. Generational differences in the effects of insecurity, restructured workplace temporalities, and technology on organizational loyalty. Sociological Spectrum31 (2): 163-92.
16.
BrumleyKrista M.2014. The gendered ideal worker narrative: Professional women’s and men’s work experiences in the new economy at a Mexican company. Gender & Society28 (6): 799-823.
17.
CechErin A.Blair-LoyMary. 2010. Perceiving glass ceilings? Meritocratic versus structural explanations of gender inequality among women in science and technology. Social Problems57 (3): 371-97.
18.
CechErin A.Blair-LoyMaryRogersLaura E.2018. Recognizing chilliness: How schemas of inequality shape views of culture and climate in work environments. American Journal of Cultural Sociology6 (1): 125-60.
19.
CharmazKathy. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
CockburnCynthia. 1985. Machinery of dominance: Women, men, and technical know-how. London: Pluto Press.
21.
ColcloughGlenna S.TolbertCharles M.2001. Transformations of high-tech labor markets and socioeconomic inequalities. Sociological Focus34 (3): 299-320.
22.
CooperMarianne. 2000. Being the “go-to guy”: Fatherhood, masculinity, and the organization of work in Silicon Valley. Qualitative Sociology23 (4): 379-405.
23.
DiMaggioPaul. 2001. The twenty-first-century firm: Changing economic organization in international perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
DryburghHeather. 1999. Work hard, play hard: Women and professionalization in engineering—Adapting to the culture. Gender & Society13 (5): 664-82.
EmersonRobert M.FretzRachel I.ShawLinda L.1995. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
EnglandPaulaAllisonPaulLiSuMarkNoahThompsonJenniferBudigMichelle J.SunHan. 2007. Why are some academic fields tipping toward female? The sex composition of U.S. fields of doctoral degree receipt, 1971-2002. Sociology of Education80 (1): 23-42.
28.
FraserNancy. 2009. Feminism, capitalism, and the cunning of history. New Left Review56 (March-April): 97-117.
29.
GillRosalind. 2002. Cool, creative and egalitarian? Exploring gender in project-based new media work in Euro. Information, Communication & Society5 (1): 70-89.
HallRoberta M.SandlerBernice R.1982. The classroom climate: A chilly one for women?Washington, DC: Project on the Status and Education of Women.
32.
HydeAlan. 2003. Working in Silicon Valley: Economic and legal analysis of a high-velocity labor market. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
33.
KallebergArne L.2011. Good jobs, bad jobs: The rise of polarized and precarious employment. New York: Russell Sage.
34.
KanterRosabeth Moss. 1977. Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
35.
KellyErin L.AmmonsSamantha K.ChermackKellyMoenPhyllis. 2010. Gendered challenge, gendered response: Confronting the ideal worker norm in a white-collar organization. Gender & Society24 (3): 281-303.
36.
KvandeElin. 2002. Doing masculinities in organizational restructuring. NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research10 (1): 16-25.
37.
KvandeElinRasmussenBente. 1994. Men in male-dominated organizations and their encounter with women intruders. Scandinavian Journal of Management10 (2): 163-73.
38.
LoflandJohnSnowDavidAndersonLeonLoflandLyn H.2006. Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis, 4th ed.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
39.
MartensMartin L.2004. IPO effects: Corporate restructuring when a firm goes public. Journal of Public Affairs4 (2): 155-69.
40.
MartinPatricia Yancey. 2013. Sociologists for Women in Society: A feminist bureaucracy?Gender & Society27 (3): 281-93.
41.
McIlweeJudith S.RobinsonJ. Gregg. 1992. Women in engineering: Gender, power, and workplace culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.
42.
MillerDiana L. 2016. Gender and the artist archetype: Understanding gender inequality in artistic careers. Sociology Compass10 (2): 119-31.
43.
PadavicIreneReskinBarbara. 2002. Women and men at work, 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
PierceJennifer L.1996. Gender trials: Emotional lives in contemporary law firms. Berkeley: University of California Press.
45.
PioreMichael J.SabelCharles F.1984. The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity. New York: Basic Books.
46.
RadhakrishnanSmitha. 2011. Appropriately Indian: Gender and culture in a new transnational class. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
47.
ReskinBarbara F.McBrierDebra Branch. 2000. Why not ascription? Organizations’ employment of male and female managers. American Sociological Review65 (2): 210-33.
48.
ReskinBarbara F.RoosPatricia A.1990. Job queues, gender queues: Explaining women’s inroads into male occupations. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
49.
RidgewayCecilia. 2011. Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. New York: Oxford University Press.
50.
RothLouise Marie. 2006. Selling women short: Gender and money on Wall Street. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
RothWendy D.SonnertGerhard. 2010. The costs and benefits of “red tape”: Anti-bureaucratic structure and gender inequity in a science research organization. Social Studies of Science41 (3): 385-409.
52.
RubinBeth A.1996. Shifts in the social contract. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
53.
SaxenianAnnaLee. 1994. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54.
ShihJohanna. 2006. Circumventing discrimination: Gender and ethnic strategies in Silicon Valley. Gender & Society20 (2): 177-206.
55.
SmithVicki. 1993. Flexibility in work and employment: The impact on women. Research in the Sociology of Organizations11:195-216.
56.
Smith-DoerrLaurel. 2004. Flexibility and fairness: Effects of the network form of organization on gender equity in life science careers. Sociological Perspectives47 (1): 25-54.
57.
VallasSteven P.2003. Why teamwork fails: Obstacles to workplace change in four manufacturing plants. American Sociological Review68 (2): 223-50.
58.
VassalloTraeLevyEllenMadanskyMicheleMickellHillaryPorterBennettLeasMonicaOberweisJulie. 2015. Elephant in the valley. https://www.elephantinthevalley.com/.
59.
WajcmanJudy. 1991. Feminism confronts technology. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
60.
WeberMax. 1947. The theory of social and economic organizations. Translated by HendersonA. M.ParsonsTalcott. London: Collier Macmillan.
61.
WhittingtonKjersten BunkerSmith-DoerrLaurel. 2008. Women inventors in context: Disparities in patenting across academia and industry. Gender & Society22 (2): 194-218.
62.
WhyteWilliam. 1956. The organization man. New York: Simon & Schuster.
63.
WilliamsChristine L.1995. Still a man’s world: Men who do women’s work. Berkeley: University of California Press.
64.
WilliamsChristine L.2013. The glass escalator, revisited: Gender inequality in neoliberal times. Gender & Society27 (5): 609-29.
65.
WilliamsChristine L.2017. The gender of layoffs in the oil and gas industry. In Precarious work, vol. 31: Research in the sociology of work, edited by KallebergArne L.VallasSteven P.London: Emerald.
66.
WilliamsChristine L.MullerChandraKilanskiKristine. 2012. Gendered organizations in the new economy. Gender & Society26 (4): 549-73.
67.
WilliamsJoan C.2000. Unbending gender: Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. New York: Oxford University Press.
68.
WolfMichaelTerrellDalton. 2016. The high-tech industry, what is it and why it matters to our economic future. In Beyond the numbers: Employment and unemployment. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
69.
WoodallJeanEdwardsChristineWelchmanRosemary. 1997. Organizational restructuring and the achievement of an equal opportunity culture. Gender, Work & Organization4 (1): 2-12.
70.
WoodwardKathy. 2008. Hanging out and hanging about: Insider/outsider research in the sport of boxing. Ethnography9 (4): 536-61.
71.
WynnAlison T.CorrellShelley J.2018. Puncturing the pipeline: Do technology companies alienate women in recruiting sessions?Social Studies of Science48 (1): 149-64.
