In the past 20 years, Latinas have begun to outperform Latinos in high school completion and college enrollment, tracking the overall “gender reversal” in college attainment that favors women. Few studies have examined what factors contribute to Latinas’ increasing educational success. This article focuses on gender differences in college-going behavior among a cohort of 50 Latino/a college aspirants in the San Francisco East Bay Area. Through 136 longitudinal interviews, I examine trends in Latinos/as’ postsecondary pathways and life course decisions over a two-year period. Findings suggest evidence for gendered familism, in which gender and racial/ethnic beliefs intersect to differentially shape Latinos/as’ attitudes, behaviors, and college choices. Gendered familism encouraged Latinas to seek a four-year degree as a means of earning independence, while Latinos expressed a sense of automatic autonomy that was not as strongly tied to educational outcomes.
Baca ZinnMaxine. 1980. Employment and education of Mexican-American women: The interplay of modernity and ethnicity in eight families. Harvard Educational Review50:47-62.
2.
BarajasHeidi LasleyPierceJennifer L.2001. The significance of race and gender in school success among Latinas and Latinos in college. Gender & Society15:859-78.
3.
BeiselNicolaKayTamara. 2004. Abortion, race and gender in nineteenth-century America. American Sociological Review69:498-518.
4.
BettieJulie. 2002. Exceptions to the rule: Upwardly mobile white and Mexican American high school girls. Gender & Society16:403-22.
5.
BuchmannClaudiaDiPreteThomas A.2006. The growing female advantage in college completion: The role of family background and academic achievement. American Sociological Review71:515-41.
6.
BurawoyMichaelBurtonAliceFergusonAnn ArnettFoxKathryn J.1991. Ethnography unbound: Power and resistance in the modern metropolis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
CammarotaJulio. 2004. The gendered and racialized pathways of Latina and Latino youth: Different struggles, different resistances in the urban context. Anthropology & Education Quarterly35:53-74.
8.
CejaMiguel. 2004. Chicana college aspirations and the role of parents: Developing educational resiliency. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education3:338-62.
9.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 2009. Black feminist thought. New York: Routledge Classics.
10.
DesmondMatthewLópez TurleyRuth N.2009. The role of familism in explaining the Hispanic-white college application gap. Social Problems56:311-34.
11.
DiPreteThomasBuchmannClaudia. 2006. Gender-specific trends in the value of education and the emerging gender gap in college completion. Demography43:1-24.
12.
DiPreteThomasBuchmannClaudia. 2013. The rise of women: The growing gender gap in education and what it means for American schools. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
13.
DowdAlicia C.2003. From access to outcome equity: Revitalizing the democratic mission of the community college. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science586:92-119.
14.
EspinozaRoberta. 2010. The good daughter dilemma: Latinas managing family and school demands. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education9:317-30.
15.
FergusonAnn Arnett. 2001. Bad boys: Public schools in the making of black masculinity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
16.
GlennEvelyn Nakano. 1999. The social construction and institutionalization of gender and race: An integrative framework. In Revisioning gender, edited by FerreeM. M.LorberJ.HessB. B.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
GloriaAlberta M.CastellanosJeanett. 2012. Desafíos y bendiciones. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education11:82-99.
18.
GoldinClaudiaKatzLawrence F.KuziemkoIlyana. 2006. The homecoming of American college women: The reversal of the college gender gap. Journal of Economic Perspectives20:133-56.
19.
GowanMaryTreviñoMelanie. 1998. An examination of gender differences in Mexican-American attitudes toward family and career roles. Sex Roles38:1079-93.
20.
HamiltonLauraArmstrongElizabeth A.2009. Gendered sexuality in young adulthood: Double binds and flawed options. Gender & Society23:589-616.
21.
Hondagneu-SoteloPierrette. 1992. Overcoming patriarchal constraints: The reconstruction of gender relations among Mexican immigrant women and men. Gender & Society6:393-415.
22.
HurtadoSylviaInkelasKaren KurotsuchiBriggsCharlotteRheeByung-Shik. 1997. Differences in college access and choice among racial/ethnic groups: Identifying continuing barriers. Research in Higher Education38:43-75.
23.
JacobBrian A.2002. Where the boys aren’t: Non-cognitive skills, returns to school and the gender gap in higher education. Economics of Education Review21:589-98.
24.
LewisAmanda E.2003. Race in the schoolyard: Negotiating the color line in classrooms and communities. Princeton, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
25.
LopezNancy. 2002. Hopeful girls, troubled boys: Race and gender disparity in urban education, 1st edition. New York: Routledge.
26.
McCallLeslie. 2005. The complexity of intersectionality. Signs30:1771-800.
27.
OlsenLaurie. 1997. Made in America: Immigrant students in our public schools. New York: New Press.
28.
OvinkSarah. 2013. DREAMers maintaining the dream. Paper presented at Annual Meeting, Southern Sociological Society, Atlanta.
29.
OvinkSarahKalogridesDemetra. 2013. No place like home? Familism and the Latino/a-white college attendance gap. Paper presented at Annual Meeting, American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
30.
PeñaManuel. 1991. Class, gender, and machismo: The “treacherous woman” folklore of Mexican male workers. Gender & Society5:30-46.
31.
PérezPatricia A.McDonoughPatricia M.2008. Understanding Latina and Latino college choice. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education7:249 -65.
32.
PortesAlejandroRumbautRubén G.2001. Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
RaffaelliMarcelaOntaiLenna. 2004. Gender socialization in Latino/a families: Results from two retrospective studies. Sex Roles50:287-99.
34.
RidgewayCecilia L.CorrellShelley J.2004. Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society18:510-31.
35.
RoschelleAnne R.1999. Gender, family structure, and social structure: Racial ethnic families in the United States. In Revisioning gender, edited by FerreeM. M.LorberJ.HessB. B.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
SabogalFabioMarinGerardoReginaOtero-SabogalBarbara VanossMarinPerez-StableEliseo J.1987. Hispanic familism and acculturation: What changes and what doesn’t?Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences9:397-412.
37.
SaenzVictor B.PonjuanLuis. 2009. The vanishing Latino male in higher education. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education8:54-89.
38.
SewellWilliam H.1992. A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology98:1-29.
39.
SmithRobert C.2002. Gender, ethnicity and race in school and work outcomes of second-generation Mexican Americans. In Latinos, remaking America, edited by Suárez-OrozcoM. M.PaezM.Berkeley: University of California Press.
40.
SySusan R.RomeroJessica. 2008. Family responsibilities among Latina college students from immigrant families. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education7:212-27.
41.
TrustyJerryPlataMaximinoSalazarCarmen F.2003. Modeling Mexican Americans’ educational expectations: Longitudinal effects of variables across adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Research18:131-53.
42.
U.S. Department of Education. 2008. Digest of education statistics, Table 200.
43.
U.S. Department of Education. 2010. National Center for Education Statistics, 1976-77 and 1980-81; 1989-90 through 2008-09 Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), September, Table 296.
44.
WilliamsL.AlvarezSandra D.Andrade HauckKevin S.2002. My name is not María: Young Latinas seeking home in the heartland. Social Problems49:563.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
