Previous research on gender-based economic inequality has emphasized occupational segregation as the leading explanatory factor for the gender wage gap. Yet the globalization of the U.S. economy has affected gender inequality in fundamental ways and potentially diminished the influence of occupational gender segregation. We examine whether occupational gender segregation continues to be the main determinant of gender earnings inequality and to what extent globalization processes have emerged as important determinants of inequality between women’s and men’s earnings. We study factors contributing to the gender earnings ratio as well as the median earnings of men and women for 271 U.S. metropolitan areas. The results indicate that occupational segregation is still the leading determinant of gender earnings inequality, that its effects are only slightly diminished by the presence of globalization, and that various aspects of the global economy independently influence the gender earnings gap.
AckerJoan. 2004. Gender, capitalism and globalization. Critical Sociology30:17-41.
2.
AldersonArthurNielsenFrancois. 1999. Inequality, development and dependence: A reconsideration. American Sociological Review64:606-31.
3.
BeckerGary S.1957. The economics of discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
BergmannBarbara R.2011. Sex segregation in the blue-collar occupations: Women’s choices or unremedied discrimination? Comment on England. Gender & Society25:88-93.
5.
BernhardtAnnetteMorrisMartinaHandcockMark S.1995. Women’s gains or men’s losses? A closer look at the shrinking gender gap in earnings. American Journal of Sociology101:302-28.
6.
BlackSandra E.BrainerdElizabeth. 2004. Importing equality? The impact of globalization on gender discrimination. Industrial and Labor Relations Review57:540-59.
7.
Blair-LoyMaryJacobsJerry A.2003. Globalization, work hours, and the care deficit among stockbrokers. Gender & Society17:230-49.
8.
BornschierVolkerChase-DunnChristopherRubinsonRichard. 1978. Cross-national evidence of the effects of foreign investment and aid on economic growth and inequality: A survey of findings and a reanalysis. American Journal of Sociology84:651-83.
9.
BradyDavidBeckfieldJasonZhaoWei. 2007. The consequences of economic globalization for affluent democracies. Annual Review of Sociology33:313-34.
10.
CohenPhilipHuffmanMatt. 2003a. Individuals, jobs, and labor markets: The devaluation of women’s work. American Sociological Review68:443-63.
11.
CohenPhilipHuffmanMatt. 2003b. Occupational segregation and the devaluation of women’s work across U.S. labor markets. Social Forces81:881-908.
12.
ConnellR. W.2000. The men and the boys. Berkeley: University of California Press.
CotterDavid A.DeFioreJoAnnHermsenJoan M.KowalewskiBrenda MarstellerVannemanReeve. 1997. All women benefit: The macro-level effect of occupational integration on gender earnings equality. American Sociological Review62:714-34.
15.
DickenPeter. 2003. Global shift: Reshaping the global economic map in the 21st century. London: Sage.
16.
DiMaggioPaul J.PowellWalter W.1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review48:147-60.
17.
EhrenreichBarbaraHochschildArlie Russell. 2003. Global women: Nannies, maids, and sex workers in the new economy. New York: Metropolitan Books.
18.
EnglandPaula. 1992. Comparable worth: Theories and evidence. New York: Aldine deGruyter.
19.
EnglandPaula. 2010. The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender & Society24:149-66.
20.
EnglandPaula. 2011. Reassessing the uneven gender revolution and its slowdown. Gender & Society25:113-23.
21.
EnglandPaulaFarkasGeorgeKilbourneBarbara StanekDouThomas. 1988. Explaining occupational sex segregation and wages: Findings from a model with fixed effects. American Sociological Review53:544-58.
22.
GereffiGary. 2005. The global economy: Organization, governance and development. In The handbook of economic sociology, edited by SmelserNeil J.SwedbergRichard. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
GranovetterMarkSwedbergRichard, eds. 2011. The sociology of economic life. Boulder, MO: Westview.
24.
JacobsJerryBlair-LoyMary. 1996. Race, gender, local labor markets, and occupational devaluation. Sociological Focus29:209-30.
25.
KallebergArne L.BergIvar. 1987. Work and industry: Structures, markets, and processes. New York: Plenum.
26.
KilbourneBarbarfa StanekEnglandPaulaBeronKurt. 1994. Effects of individual, occupational, and industrial characteristics on earnings: Intersections of race and gender. Social Forces72:1149-76.
27.
KrugmanPaul. 1995. Development, geography and economic theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.
28.
LorenceJon. 1991. Growth in service sector employment and MSA gender earnings inequality: 1970-1980. Social Forces69:763-83.
29.
MahutgaMatthew C.BandeljNina. 2008. Foreign investment and income inequality: The natural experiment of Central and Eastern Europe. International Journal of Comparative Sociology49:429-54.
30.
McCallLeslie. 2001a. Complex inequality: Gender, class and race in the new economy. New York: Routledge.
31.
McCallLeslie. 2001b. Sources of racial wage inequality in metropolitan labor markets: Racial, ethnic, and gender differences. American Sociological Review66:520-41.
32.
McCallLeslie. 2011. Women and men as class and race actors: Comment on England. Gender & Society25:94-100.
33.
MeyerLisa B.2003. Economic globalization and women’s status in the labor market: A cross-national investigation of occupational sex segregation and inequality. Sociological Quarterly44:351-83.
34.
MilkmanRuth. 1987. Gender at work: The dynamics of job segregation by sex during World War II. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
35.
MilkmanRuth. 1997. Farewell to the factory: Auto workers in the late twentieth century. Berkeley: University of California Press.
36.
MilkmanRuth. 2006. L.A. story: Immigrant workers and the future of the U.S. labor movement. New York, Russell Sage Foundation.
37.
OostendorpRemco H.2009. Globalization and the gender wage gap. World Bank Economic Review25:141-61.
38.
ParcelToby L.1989. Comparable worth, occupational labor markets, and occupational earnings: Results from the 1980 census. In Pay equity: Empirical inquiries, edited by MichaelRobert T.HartmannHeidi I.O’FarrellBrigid. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
39.
PortesAlejandroManningRobert D.1986. The immigrant enclave: Theory and empirical examples. In Competitive ethnic relations, edited by OlzakSusanNagelJoane. New York: Academic Press.
40.
RaworthKate. 2004. Trading away our rights: Women working in global supply chains. Oxford: Oxfam International.
41.
ReskinBarbara F.1993. Sex segregation in the workplace. Annual Review of Sociology19:241-70.
42.
ReskinBarbara F.2003. Including mechanisms in our models of ascriptive inequality: 2002 presidential address. American Sociological Review68:1-21.
43.
ReskinBarbara F.MarotoMichelle L.2011. What trends? Whose choices? Comment on England. Gender & Society25:81-87.
44.
SassenSaskia. 2001. The global city. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45.
SchuesslerKarl. 1974. Analysis of ratio variables: Opportunities and pitfalls. American Journal of Sociology80:379-96.
46.
Tomaskovic-DeveyDonald. 1993. Gender and racial inequality at work: The sources and consequences of job segregation. Ithaca, NY: Industrial and Labor Relations Press.
47.
WallaceMichaelGauchatGordonFullertonAndrew S.2011. Globalization, labor market transformation, and metropolitan earnings inequality. Social Science Research40:15-36.
48.
WallaceMichaelGauchatGordonFullertonAndrew S.2012. Globalization and earnings inequality in metropolitan areas: Evidence from the USA. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. In press.
49.
WallerMarguriteMarcosSylvia, eds. 2005. Dialogue and difference: Feminisms challenge globalization. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
50.
ZellnerArnoldTheilHenri. 1962. Three-stage least squares: Simultaneous estimation of simultaneous equations. Econometrica30:54-78.
