Recent scholarship has identified the modern wedding as a principal site for the construction of heteronormativity. This article examines whether and how the participation of same-sex couples in the wedding ritual can challenge this construction. Photographs from the 2004 San Francisco same-sex weddings were quantitatively content-coded for subjects’ gender presentation and for the extent to which the couple embodied the heteronormative wedding standard of one bride and one groom. I find that all the men in these photographs conformed to gender norms and thus no male couple conformed to the wedding standard. In contrast, approximately one-fifth of the women presented non-normative gender, and more than two-thirds of the formally dressed lesbian couples conformed to the wedding standard of a bride and a groom. In a close reading of four photographs, I argue that these images have the potential to challenge assumptions about normative sex, gender, and sexuality at the level of the symbolic when understood in relation to the institution of marriage. Nonetheless, the enactment of weddings depicted in these images may also reify weddings as heteronormative by conforming to expectations about how individuals and couples present themselves when marrying. These findings point to the importance of distinguishing symbolic and enacted heteronormativity.
BadgettM. V. Lee. 2009. When gay people get married: What happens when societies legalize same-sex marriage. New York: New York University Press.
2.
BernsteinMaryReimannRenate. 2001. Queer families and the politics of visibility. In Queer families, queer politics: Challenging culture and the state, edited by BernsteinM.ReimannR.New York: Columbia University Press.
3.
BersaniLeo. 1987. Is the rectum a grave? In AIDS: Cultural analysis, cultural activism, edited by CrimpD.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
BodenSharon. 2003. Consumerism, romance, and the wedding experience. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
5.
BourdieuPierre. (1965) 1990. Photography: A middle-brow art. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
ButlerJudith. 1990. Gender trouble. New York: Routledge.
8.
ButlerJudith. 1991. Imitation and gender insubordination. In Inside/out, edited by FussD.New York: Routledge.
9.
ButlerJudith. 1993. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.”New York: Routledge.
10.
ButlerJudith. 1997. The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
ButlerJudith. 2002. Is kinship always already heterosexual?Differences13: 14-44.
12.
ButlerJudith. 2004. Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. New York: Verso.
13.
CalhounCheshire. 1995. The gender closet: Lesbian disappearance under the sign “women.”Feminist Studies21:7-34.
14.
CalhounCheshire. 2000. Feminism, The Family, and The Politics of the Closet: Lesbian and Gay Displacement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
CarolinLouiseBewleyCatherine. 1998. Girl talk: Femmes in discussion. In butch/femme: Inside lesbian gender, edited by MuntS. R.London: Cassell.
16.
CaseSue Ellen. 1988. Towards a butch-femme aesthetic. Discourse11:55-73.
17.
ChasnoffDebra. 2004. One wedding and a revolution. Women’s Educational Media.
18.
CottNancy F.2000. Public vows: A history of marriage and the nation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
DaltonSusan. 2001. Protecting our parent-child relationships: Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of second-parent adoption. In Queer families, queer politics: Challenging culture and the state, edited by BernsteinM.ReimannR.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
20.
DugganLisa. 2002. The new homonormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism. In Materializing democracy: Toward a revitalized cultural politics, edited by CastronovoR.NelsonD.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
21.
EllisHavelock. 1895. Sexual inversion in women. Abenist and Neurologist16:141-58.
22.
EskridgeWilliam N.Jr. 1996. The case for same-sex marriage. New York: Free Press.
23.
EssigLaurie. 2005. The mermaid and the heterosexual imagination. In Thinking straight: The power, the promise, and the paradox of heterosexuality, edited by IngrahamC.New York: Routledge.
24.
EttelbrickPaula L.1992. Since when is marriage a path to liberation?Lesbian and gay marriage: Private commitments, public ceremonies, edited by ShermanS.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
25.
FoucaultMichel. 1978. The history of sexuality, an introduction, translated by HurleyR.New York: Pantheon.
26.
FreemanElisabeth. 2002. The wedding complex: Forms of belonging in modern American culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
27.
GellerJaclyn. 2001. Here comes the bride: Women, weddings, and the marriage mystique. New York: Four Walls Eight Windows.
28.
GoldfarbSally F.1998. Family law, marriage, and heterosexuality: Questioning the assumptions. In Constructing family, constructing change: Shifting legal perspectives on same-sex relationships, vol. 7. Temple, PA: Temple Political and Civil Rights Law Review.
29.
HalberstamJudith. 1998a. Between butches. In Butch/femme: Inside lesbian gender, edited by MuntS. R.London: Cassell.
30.
HalberstamJudith. 1998b. Female masculinity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
31.
HowardVicki. 2006. Brides, Inc.: American weddings and the business of tradition. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
32.
HullKathleen E.2006. Same-sex marriage: The cultural politics of love and law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
IngrahamChrys. 1994. The heterosexual imaginary: Feminist sociology and theories of gender. Sociological Theory12:203-19.
34.
IngrahamChrys. 1999. White weddings: Romancing heterosexuality in popular culture. New York: Routledge.
35.
IngrahamChrys. 2003. Ritualizing heterosexuality: Weddings as performance. In Sexual lives: A reader on the theories and realities of human sexualities, edited by HeasleyR.CraneB.New York: McGraw-Hill.
36.
IngrahamChrys. 2005. Introduction: Thinking straight. In Thinking straight: The power, the promise, and the paradox of heterosexuality, edited by IngrahamC.New York: Routledge.
37.
IngrahamChrys. 2006. Thinking straight, acting bent: Heteronormativity and homosexuality. In Handbook of gender and women’s studies, edited by DavisK.EvansM.LorberJ.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
38.
KandaswamyPriya. 2008. State austerity and the racial politics of same-sex marriage in the US. Sexualities11:706-725.
39.
KitzingerCeliaWilkinsonSue. 2004. The re-branding of marriage: Why we got married instead of registering a civil partnership. Feminism & Psychology14:127-150.
LewinEllen. 1993. Lesbian mothers: accounts of gender in American culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
42.
LewinEllen. 1998. Recognizing ourselves: Ceremonies of lesbian and gay commitment. New York: Columbia University Press.
43.
LorberJudith. 1996. Beyond the binaries: Depolarizing the categories of sex, sexuality, and gender. Sociological Inquiry66:143-59.
44.
NewtonEsther. 1984. The mythic mannish lesbian: Radclyffe hall and the new woman. Signs9:557-75.
45.
NicolNancySmithMiriam. 2008. Legal struggles and political resistance: Same-sex marriage in Canada and the USA. Sexualities11:667-87.
46.
NorfleetBarbara. 1979. Wedding. New York: Simon & Schuster.
47.
OswaldRamona Faith. 2000. A member of the wedding? Heterosexism and family ritual. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships17:349-68.
48.
OtnesCele C.PleckElizabeth H.2003. Cinderella dreams: The allure of the lavish wedding. Berkeley: University of California Press.
49.
PetersMarshaMergenBernard. 1977. “Doing the rest”: The uses of photographs in American studies. American Quarterly29:280-303.
50.
RichB. Ruby. 1986. Review: Feminism and sexuality in the 1980s. Feminist Studies12:525-61.
51.
RuppLeila J.TaylorVerta. 2003. Drag queens at the 801 Cabaret. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52.
SchusterSherril Horowitz. 1997. Here comes the bride: Wedding announcements and bridal norms. Sociological Focus30:279-94.
53.
SmartCarol. 2008. “Can I be bridesmaid?” Combining the personal and political in same-sex weddings. Sexualities11:761-76.
54.
StoddardThomas B.1992. Why gay people should seek the right to marry. Lesbian and gay marriage: Private ceremonies, public commitments, edited by ShermanS.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
55.
SullivanAndrew. 1997. Introduction. Same-sex marriage: Pro and con edited by SullivanA.New York: Vintage Books.
56.
TaylorVertaRuppLeila J.GamsonJoshua. 2004. Performing protest: Drag shows as tactical repertoires of the gay and lesbian movement. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change25:105-37.
57.
TylerCarole-Anne. 2003. Female impersonation. New York: Routledge.
58.
ValocchiStephen. 2005. Not yet queer enough: The lessons of queer theory for the sociology of gender and sexuality. Gender & Society19:750-70.
59.
ValverdeMariana. 2006. A new entity in the history of sexuality: The respectable same-sex couple. Feminist Studies32:155-62.
60.
WalkerLisa. 1993. How to recognize a lesbian: The cultural politics of looking like what you are. Signs18:866-90.
61.
WaltersSuzanna D.2001. Take my domestic partner, please: Gays and marriage in the era of the visible. In Queer families, queer politics: Challenging culture and the state, edited by BernsteinM.ReimannR.New York: Columbia University Press.
62.
WarnerMichael. 1993. Introduction. In Fear of a queer planet: Queer politics and social theory, edited by WarnerM.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
63.
WhatlingClare. 1998. Femme to Femme: A love story. In Butch/femme: Inside lesbian gender, edited by MuntS. R.London: Cassell.
64.
WolfsonEvan. 2004. Why marriage matters: America, equality, and gay people’s right to marry. New York: Simon & Schuster
