Youth sports have been recognized as an arena for men to meet increased cultural expectations of being involved in their children’s lives. Indeed, in contrast to other child care practices, many men are eager to take part in their children’s organized sports. Drawing on an ethnographic study of middle-class families in the United States, this study examines how men juggle two contrasting cultural models of masculinity when fathering through sports—a performance-oriented orthodox masculinity that historically has been associated with sports and a caring, inclusive masculinity that promotes the nurturing of one’s children. Through a detailed analysis of how fathers’ sports involvement unfolds on the ground, we show how men, in order to portray themselves as “good” fathers, attempt to strike a balance between pushing their children to excel and supporting them regardless of their performance. We propose that although men may value inclusive masculinity when fathering through youth sports, at the same time they exercise orthodox masculinity in other domestic domains.
AdamsA.2011. “Josh wears pink cleats”: Inclusive masculinity on the soccer field. Journal of Homosexuality58:579-96.
2.
AndersonE.2009. Inclusive masculinity: The changing nature of masculinities. New York: Routledge.
3.
AndersonE.2011. Masculinities and sexualities in sports and physical cultures: Three decades of evolving research. Journal of Homosexuality58:565-78.
4.
CavalierE.2011. Men at sport: Gay men’s experiences in the sport workplace. Journal of Homosexuality58:626-46.
5.
ChafetzJ. S.KotarbaJ. A.1999. Little League mothers and the reproduction of gender. In Inside sports, edited by CoakleyJ.DonnellyP.New York: Routledge.
6.
CoakleyJ.2006. The good father: Parental expectations and youth sports. Leisure Studies25:153-63.
7.
ColtraneS.2000. Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family62:1208-33.
8.
ConnellR. W.1995. Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9.
ConnellR. W.2000. The men and the boys. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
ConnellR. W.MesserschmidtJ.2005. Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society19:829-59.
11.
DoucetA.2006. Do men mother? Fathering, care, and domestic responsibility. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
12.
DoucetA.MerlaL.2007. Stay-at-home fathering: A strategy for balancing work and home in Canadian and Belgian families. Community, Work and Family10:455-73.
13.
DunnJ. S.KinneyD. A.HofferthS. L.2003. Parental ideologies and children’s after-school activities. American Behavioral Scientist46:1359-86.
14.
EcclesJ. S.BarberB. L.StoneM.HuntJ.2003. Extracurricular activities and adolescent development. Journal of Social Issues59:865-89.
15.
EhrenreichB.1989. Fear of falling: The inner life of the middle class. New York: Pantheon Books.
16.
FineG. A.1987. With the boys: Little League baseball and preadolescent culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
GarfinkelH.1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18.
GiddensA.1991. Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity.
19.
GoodJ.2009. Multitasking and attention in interaction: Dealing with multiple tasks in everyday family life. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
20.
GoodJ.GottzénL.2010. The second half of the “second shift”: Swedish and U.S. fathers’ domestic work responsibility upon return home. UCLA Sloan CELF Working Paper 97.
GramsciA.1971. Selections from the prison note books. New York: International Publishers.
23.
GutiérrezK.IzquierdoC.Kremer-SadlikT.2010. Middle-class working families’ beliefs and engagement in children’s extra-curricular activities: The social organization of children’s futures. International Journal of Learning17:633-56.
24.
HarringtonM.2006. Sport and leisure as contexts for fathering in Australian families. Leisure Studies25:165-83.
25.
HaysS.1996. The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26.
HowsonR.2009. Deconstructing hegemonic masculinity: Contradiction, hegemony, and dislocation. NORMA: Nordic Journal for Masculinity Studies4:6-24.
27.
JenkinsR.2009. Nonresident fathers’ leisure with their children. Leisure Sciences31:255-71.
28.
KamoY.CohenE. E.1998. Division of household work between partners: A comparison between black and white couples. Journal of Comparative Family Studies29:132-45.
29.
KayT.2007. Fathering through sport. World Leisure49:69-82.
30.
KayT., ed. 2009. Fathering through sport and leisure. London: Routledge.
31.
Kremer-SadlikT.GutiérrezK.In press. Homework and recreation: Investing in children’s future. In Fast forward families: Home, work, and relationships in middle class America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
32.
Kremer-SadlikT.IzquierdoC.FatiganteM.2010. Making meaning of everyday practices: Parents’ attitudes toward children’s extracurricular activities in the United States and in Italy. Anthropology & Education Quarterly41:35-54.
33.
Kremer-SadlikT.KimJ. L.2007. Lessons from sports: Children’s socialization to values through family interaction during sports activities. Discourse & Society18:35-52.
34.
LareauA.2003. Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
35.
LaRossaR.1988. Fatherhood and social change. Family Relations37:451-57.
36.
LaRossaR.2005. “Until the ball glows in the twilight”: Fatherhood, baseball, and the game of playing catch. In Situated fathering: A focus on physical and social spaces, edited by MarsiglioW.RoyK.Litton FoxG.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
37.
LuptonD.BarclayL.1997. Constructing fatherhood: Discourses and experiences. London: Sage.
38.
MarksL.PalkovitzR.2004. American fatherhood types: The good, the bad, and the uninterested. Fathering2:113-29.
39.
McCormackM.2011. Hierarchy without hegemony: Locating boys in an inclusive masculinity setting. Sociological Perspectives54:83-101.
40.
MessnerM.2002. Taking the field: Women, men, and sports. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
41.
MessnerM.2005. Still a man’s world? Studying masculinities and sport. In Handbook of studies on men and masculinities, edited by KimmelM. S.HearnJ.ConnellR. W.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
MessnerM.2009. It’s all for the kids: Gender, families and youth sports. Berkeley: University of California Press.
43.
MillerT.2011. Making sense of fatherhood: Gender, caring and work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
OchsE.GraeschA. P.MittmannA.BradburyT.RepettiR.2006. Video ethnography and ethnoarchaeological tracking. In The work and family handbook, edited by Pitt-CatsouphesM.Ernst KossekE.SweetS.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45.
PleckJ. H.MasciadrelliB. P.2003. Paternal involvement: Levels, sources, and consequences. In The role of the fathers in child development, 4th ed., edited by LambM.New York: John Wiley.
46.
PotterJ.1996. Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
RootL.PerryL.2008. Time out for family: Shift work, fathers and sports. Human Resource Management47:481-99.
48.
ShowsC.GerstelN.2009. Fathering, class, and gender: A comparison of physicians and emergency medical technicians. Gender & Society23:161-87.
49.
TownsendN.2002. The package deal: Marriage, work and fatherhood in men’s lives. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
