In this article, I argue that gender is a primary cultural frame for coordinating behavior and organizing social relations. I describe the implications for understanding how gender shapes social behavior and organizational structures. By my analysis, gender typically acts as a background identity that biases, in gendered directions, the performance of behaviors undertaken in the name of organizational roles and identities. I develop an account of how the background effects of the gender frame on behavior vary by the context that different organizational and institutional structures set but can also infuse gendered meanings into organizational practices. Next, I apply this account to two empirical illustrations to demonstrate that we cannot understand the shape that the structure of gender inequality and gender difference takes in particular institutional or societal contexts without taking into account the background effects of the gender frame on behavior in these contexts.
Acker, Joan.1990. Hierarchies, jobs, and bodies: A theory of gendered organizations . Gender & Society4:139-58.
2.
Bielby, William T.2000. Minimizing workplace gender and racial bias. Contemporary Sociology29:120-28.
3.
Blair, Irene V., and Mahzarin R. Banaji .1996. Automatic and controlled processes in stereotype priming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology70:1142-63.
4.
Brewer, Marilynn, and Layton Lui.1989. The primacy of age and sex in the structure of person categories. Social Cognition7:262-74.
5.
Charles, Maria, and Karen Bradley.2009. Indulging our gendered selves: Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. American Journal of Sociology114, forthcoming.
6.
Charles, Maria, and David B. Grusky2004. Occupational ghettos: The worldwide segregation of women and men. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7.
Chwe, Michael Suk-Young.2001. Rational ritual: Culture, coordination, and common knowledge . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
Conway, Michael, M. Teresa Pizzamiglio, and Lauren Mount.1996. Status, communality, and agency: Implications for stereotypes of gender and other groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology71:25-38.
9.
Eagly, Alice H., and Stephen J. Karau .2002. Role congruity theory of prejudice towards female leaders. Psychological Review109:573-79.
10.
Fenstermaker, Sarah, and Candace West, eds. 2002. Doing gender, doing difference: Inequality, power, and institutional change. New York: Routledge.
11.
Filardo, Emily K.1996. Gender patterns in African American and white adolescents' social interactions in same-race, mixed-sex groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology71:71-82.
12.
Fiske, Susan T.1998. Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In The handbook of social psychology, vol. 2, edited by D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, and G. Lindzey.4th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
13.
Fiske, Susan T., Amy J. Cuddy, Peter Glick, and Jun Xu.2002. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology82:878-902.
14.
Glick, Peter, and Susan T. Fiske .1999. Gender, power dynamics, and social interaction. In Revisioning gender, edited by M. M. Ferree, J. Lorber , and B. B. Hess.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Goffman, Erving.1967. Interaction ritual. Garden City, NY : Doubleday.
16.
Ito, Tiffany A., and Geoffrey R. Urland .2003. Race and gender on the brain: Electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology85:616-26.
17.
Jackman, Mary. R.1994. The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18.
Kunda, Ziva, and Steven J. Spencer .2003. When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application. Psychological Bulletin129:522-44.
19.
Lorber, Judith.1994. Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT : Yale University Press.
20.
Martin, Patricia Y.2003. "Said and done" versus "saying and doing": Gendering practices, practicing gender at work. Gender & Society17:342-66.
21.
McIllwee, Judith S., and J. Gregg Robinson .1992. Women in engineering: Gender power, and workplace culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.
22.
Milkie, Melissa A.1999. Social comparison, reflected appraisals, and mass media: The impact of pervasive beauty images on Black and white girls' self-concepts . Social Psychology Quarterly62:190-210.
23.
Nelson, Robert, and William Bridges .1999. Legalizing gender inequality: Courts, markets, and unequal pay for women in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Reskin, Barbara, and Debra Branch McBrier .2000. Why not ascription? Organizations' employment of male and female managers. American Sociological Review65:210-33.
25.
Ridgeway, Cecilia L.1997. Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment. American Sociological Review62:218-35.
26.
---. 2006. Gender as an organizing force in social relations: Implications for the future of inequality. In The declining significance of gender? edited by F. D. Blau, M. C. Brinton, and D. B. Grusky.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
27.
---. 2007. Gender as a group process: Implications for the persistence of inequality. In The social psychology of gender, edited by S. J. Correll.New York: Elsevier.
28.
Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and Shelley J. Correll .2004. Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society18 (4): 510-31.
29.
Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and Paula England.2007. Sociological approaches to sex discrimination in employment. In Sex discrimination in the workplace: Multidisciplinary perspectives, edited by F. J. Crosby, M. S. Stockdale, and A. S. Ropp.Oxford, UK: Blackwell .
30.
Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and Lynn Smith-Lovin .1999. The gender system and interaction . Annual Review of Sociology25:1991-216.
31.
Risman, Barbara J.1998. Gender vertigo: American families in transition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32.
---. 2004. Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism . Gender & Society18:429-50.
33.
Rudman, Laurie. A., and Kimberly Fairchild .2004. Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology87:157-76.
34.
Schneider, David J.2004. The psychology of stereotyping. New York: Guilford.
35.
Smith-Doerr, Laurel.2004. Women's work: Gender equality vs. hierarchy in the life sciences. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner .
36.
Stangor, Charles, Laure Lynch, Changming Duan, and Beth Glass.1992. Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology62:207-18.
37.
Steinberg, Ronnie J.1995. Gendered instructions: Cultural lag and gender bias in the hay system of job evaluation. In Gender inequality at work , edited by J. A. Jacobs.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
Wagner, David G., and Joseph Berger.1997. Gender and interpersonal task behaviors: Status expectation accounts. Sociological Perspectives40:1-32.
39.
West, Candace, and Don Zimmerman .1987. Doing gender. Gender & Society1:125-51.
40.
Whittington, Kjersten Bunker.2007. Employment structures as opportunity structures: The effects of location on male and female scientific dissemination. Stanford, CA: Department of Sociology, Stanford University .
41.
Whittington, Kjersten Bunker, and Laurel Smith-Doerr .2008. Women inventors in context: Disparities in patenting across academia and industry. Gender & Society22:194-218.
