In this study, we sought a better understanding of how poor women made meaning of their poverty and health. Twenty research participants used varied, multiple, and at times contradictory discourses that shaped their identities as both legitimate and powerful and illegitimate and powerless. We identified four discourses in the women's talk—illegitimate dependencies, legitimate dependencies, overwhelming odds, and critique and collectivism. These four discourses revealed complexes of meanings and networks of interpretation that subverted, accommodated, and reinterpreted dominant discourses of poverty and health. This examination is relevant for feminist researchers attempting to understand the impact of dominant discourses in the lives of socially marginalized women who continually struggle to establish and strengthen claims to legitimacy and moral worth.
Batsleer, Janet, and Beth Humphries. 2000. Welfare, exclusion, and political agency. In Welfare, exclusion, and political agency, edited by J. Batsleer and B. Humphries. London: Routledge.
2.
Beder, Sharon. 2000. Selling the work ethic: From puritan pulpit to corporate PR. London: Zed.
3.
Carabine, Jean. 2001. Unmarried motherhood 1830-1990: A genealogical analysis. In Discourse as data: A guide for analysis, edited by M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, and S. J. Yates. London: Sage.
4.
Comstock, Donald E., and Russell Fox. 1993. Participatory research as critical theory: The North Bonneville, USA, experience. In Voices of change: Participatory research in U.S. and Canada, edited by P. Park, M. Brydon-Miller, B. Hall, and T. Jackson. London: Bergin and Garvey.
5.
Crawford, Robert. 1977. You are dangerous to your health: The ideology and politics of victim blaming. International Journal of Health Services7 (4): 663-679.
6.
Crawford, Robert. 1980. Healthism and the medicalization of everyday life. International Journal of Health Services10:365-388.
7.
Croghan, Rosaleen, and Dorothy Miell. 1998. Strategies of resistance: “Bad” mothers dispute the evidence. Feminism and Psychology8 (4): 445-465.
8.
Denzin, Norman. 1994. The art and politics of interpretation. In Handbook of qualitative research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Drew, Mary L., and Keith S. Dobson. 1999. The negative self-concept in clinical depression: A discourse analysis. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne40 (2): 192-204.
10.
Duneier, Mitchell. 1999. Sidewalk. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
11.
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-77, edited by C. Gordon. New York: Pantheon.
12.
Fraser, Nancy. 1992. The uses and abuses of French discourse theories for feminist politics. In Revaluing French feminisms, edited by N. Fraser and S. L. Bartky. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
13.
Fraser, Nancy, and Linda Gordon. 1997. A genealogy of dependency: Tracing a keyword of the U.S. welfare state. In Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the “postsocialist” condition, edited by N. Fraser. New York: Routledge.
14.
Gatenby, Bev, and Maria Humphries. 2000. Feminist participatory action research: Methodological and ethical issues. Women's Studies International Forum23 (1): 89-105.
15.
Greenwood, Davydd J., and Morten Levin. 1998. Introduction to action research: Social research for social change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Health Canada. 1999. Statistical report on the health of Canadians. Charlottetown, PEI: Federal, Provincial, and Territorial Advisory Committee on Population Health.
17.
hooks, bell. 1984. Feminist theory from margin to center. Boston: South End.
18.
Ingham, Alan G.1985. From public issue to personal trouble: Well-being and the fiscal crisis of the state. Sociology of Sport Journal2:43-55.
19.
Israel, Barbara, Barry Checkoway, Amy Schulz, and Marc Zimmerman. 1994. Health education and community empowerment: Conceptualizing and measuring perceptions of individual, organizational, and community control. Health Education Quarterly21 (2):149-170.
20.
Kelly, Deirdre M.1996. Stigma stories: Four discourses about teen mothers, welfare, and poverty. Youth and Society27 (4): 421-449.
21.
Labonte, Ronald. 1982. Half-truths about health. Policy Options3:54-55.
22.
Maguire, Patricia. 1987. Doing participatory research: A feminist approach. Amherst: Centre for International Education, University of Massachusetts.
23.
Maguire, Patricia. 2001. Uneven ground: Feminisms and action research. In Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice, edited by P. Reason and H. Bradbury. London: Sage.
24.
Ministry of Human Resources. 2003. Monthly statistics: Support clients by family type. Victoria, BC: BC Statistics. http://www.bcstats.gov.bc.ca.
25.
Minkler, Meredith. 2000. Personal responsibility for health: Contexts and controversies. In Promoting healthy behaviour: How much freedom? Whose responsibility? edited by D. Callahan. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
26.
Phipps, S.2003. The impact of poverty on health: A scan of research literature. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Institute for Health Information.
27.
Rahman, Muhammad Anisur. 1983. The theory and practice of participatory action research. In The challenge of social change, edited by O. Fals-Borda. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organisation.
28.
Raphael, Dennis. 2003. Barriers to addressing the societal determinants of health: Public health units and poverty in Ontario, Canada. Health Promotion International18 (4):397-405.
29.
Reid, Colleen. 2004a. The wounds of exclusion: Poverty, women's health, and social justice. Edmonton, AB: Qualitative Institute Press.
30.
Reid, Colleen. 2004b. Advancing women's social justice agendas: A feminist action research framework. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3 (3): article 1. http://www.ualberta.ca/iiqm/backissues/3_3/html/reid.html (accessed January 19, 2006).
31.
Reid, Colleen, Allison Tom, and Wendy Frisby. Forthcoming. Finding the “action” in feminist participatory action research. Action Research.
32.
Ruspini, E.2001. The study of women's deprivation: How to reveal the gender dimension of poverty. International Journal of Social Research Methodology4 (2): 101-118.
33.
Ryan, Gery W., and Russell Bernard. 2000. Data management and analysis methods. In Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd ed., edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
Swanson, Jean. 2001. Poor bashing: The politics of exclusion. Toronto, ON: Between the Lines.
35.
Townson, Monica. 2000. A report card on women and poverty. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.
36.
Wall, Naomi Binder. 1993. The beautiful strength of my anger put to use. In And still we rise: Political mobilizing in contemporary Canada, edited by L. Carty. Toronto, ON: Women's Press.
37.
Wendell, Susan. 1996. The rejected body: Feminist philosophical reflections on disability. New York: Routledge.
White, Philip, Kevin Young, and James Gillett. 1995. Bodywork as a moral imperative: Some critical notes on health and fitness. Society and Leisure18 (1): 159-182.
40.
Williams, Joan, and M. Brinton Lykes. 2003. Bridging theory and practice: Using reflexive cycles in feminist participatory action research. Feminism & Psychology13 (3): 287-294.
41.
Yoshihama, Mieko, and E. Summerson Carr. 2002. Community participation reconsidered: Feminist participatory action research with Hmong women. Journal of Community Practice10 (4): 85-104.
42.
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
