Faced with declining fertility rates, media in Britain are reacting with anxiety about cultural annihilation. To look at how nationalism inflects concerns over biological and cultural reproduction, the authors analyze coverage of falling fertility and rising immigration in Great Britain in major newspapers in 2000-2. They find pronatalist appeals to be commonand especially directed at women but varying in how women’s duty to the nation is framed. Appeals characterized as begging, lecturing, threatening, and bribing express different relationships between individual interest and the national good and offer positive and negative views of women. The political leanings of specific newspapers affect how they connect biological reproduction to the cultural threat seen in immigration. Even positive views of women as making rational reproductive choices are tainted by alarmist views of immigration as a threat to national survival.
Berkovitch, Nitza. 1999. From motherhood to citizenship. Women’s rights and international organizations. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
2.
Best, Joel. 1989. Images of issues: Typifying contemporary social problems. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
3.
Bock, Gisela. 1991. Antinatalism, maternity, and paternity in National Socialist racism. In Maternity and gender policies: Women and the rise of the European welfare states, 1880s-1950s, edited by G. Bock and P. Thane. London and New York: Routledge.
4.
Bordo, Susan. 1993. Unbearable weight: Feminism, Western culture, and the body. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
Brown, Jessica. A. 2002. In praise of good breeding: Pronatalism and immigration in the British print media. MA Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
6.
Brush, Lisa D.2002. Changing the subject: Gender and welfare regime studies. Social Politics9 (2): 161-186.
7.
Chatterjee, Nilanjana, and Nancy E. Riley. 2001. Planning an Indian modernity: The gendered politics of fertility control. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society26 (3): 811-843.
8.
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1999. Producing the mothers of the nation: Race, class, and contemporary US population policies. InWomen citizenship and difference, edited by Nira Yuval-Davis and Pat Werbner. London: Zed Books.
9.
Cook, Timothy.1998. Governing with the news: The news media as a political institution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Correa, Sonia. 1994. Population and reproductive rights: Feminist perspectives from the south. New Delhi: Zed Books and Kali for Women.
11.
Cova, Anne. 1991. French feminism and maternity: Theories and policies, 1890-1918. In The European women’s history reader, edited by Fiona Montgomery and Christine Collete. London: Routledge.
12.
Daily Mail. 2001. How summertime is start a family time. 2 July.
13.
Daily Mail2001. SINGLES: Why women are leaving it too late to find a man. How most believe they will discover Mr. Perfect. They prefer loneliness to a bad relationship. Why one in four might never become a mother. 15 January.
14.
Daily Mail. 2002. Why ARE we too selfish to have children? 3 January.
15.
Daily Star. 2002. Give us more babies. 9 April.
16.
Daily Telegraph. 2000. Does every couple need a child? 15 March.
17.
Daily Telegraph2001. “Little emperors” taking over the world: Research shows an increase in the number of families having only one child. 19 April.
18.
Daily Telegraph. 2001. Look after mothers and the birth rate will stop dwindling. 7 August.
19.
Daily Telegraph. 2001. The one and only. 30 June.
20.
Epstein, Steven. 1996. Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
Evening Standard. 2001. Birth rate plunges for Bridget Jones and her sisters. 31 December.
22.
Ferree, Myra Marx, William A. Gamson, Jürgen Gerhards, and Dieter Rucht. 2002. Abortion discourse: Democracy and the public sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Financial Times. 2001. Why we must go forth and multiply. 13 January.
24.
Foucault, Michel. 1978. The history of sexuality: An introduction. New York: Random House.
25.
Gal, Susan. 1994. Gender in the post socialist transition: The abortion debate in Hungary. East European Politics and Societies8 (2): 256-287.
26.
Gal, Susan, and Gail Kligman. 2000. The politics of gender after socialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
Gamson, William A., and Andre Modigliani. 1989. Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructive approach. American Journal of Sociology95 (1): 1-37.
28.
Gauthier, Anne. 1993. Towards renewed fears of population and family decline. European Journal of Population9:143-167.
29.
Gitlin, Todd. 1980. The whole world is watching. Berkeley: University of California Press.
30.
Greenhalgh, Susan. 1995. Anthropology theorizes reproduction: Integrating practice, political economic, and feminist perspectives. In Situating fertility: Anthropology and demographic inquiry, edited by Susan Greenhalgh. Cambridge, CA: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Heitlinger, Alena. 1991. Pronatalism and women’s equality policies. European Journal of Population7:343-375.
32.
Hilgartner, Stephen, and Charles Bosk. 1988. The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology94 (1): 53-78.
33.
Hobson, Barbara. 2003. Some reflections and agendas for the future. Social Politics10 (2): 196-204.
34.
Hollingsworth, Leta. 1916. Social devices for impelling women to bear and rear children. American Journal of Sociology22:19-29.
35.
The Independent. 2001. Science: When millions walk the planet: Mass migration presents the world with a human crisis on an unprecedented human scale. 26 October.
36.
Jenness, Valerie, and Ryken Grattet. 2001. Making hate a crime: From social movement concept to law enforcement practice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
37.
King, Leslie. 1998. France needs children: Pronatalism, nationalism, and women’s equity. Sociological Quarterly39 (1): 33-52.
38.
Kligman, Gail. 1998. The politics of duplicity: Controlling reproduction in Ceausescu’s Romania. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
39.
Koven, Seth, and Sonya Michel. 1990. Womanly duties: Materialist politics and the origins of welfare states in France, Germany, Great Britain and the United States, 1880-1920. In The European women’s history reader, edited by Fiona Montgomery and Christine Collete. London: Routledge.
40.
Krause, Elizabeth. 2001. “Empty cradles” and the quiet revolution: Demographic discourse and cultural struggles of gender, race, and class in Italy. Cultural Anthropology16 (4): 576-611.
41.
Litt, Jacquelyn, andMaureen McNeil. 1997. Biological markers and social differentiation: “Crack babies” and the construction of the dangerous mother. Health Care for Women International18:31-41.
42.
The Mail on Sunday. 2001. Sorry, Ms. Roche, we are not a nation of immigrants. 25 February.
43.
McDowall, David. 1999. Britain in close-up. Boston: Longman.
44.
McQuail, Dennis. 1994. Mass communication theory: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
Meyers, Diana Tietjens. 2001. The rush to motherhood: Pronatalist discourse and women’s autonomy. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society26 (3): 735-773.
46.
Misra, Joya. 1998. Mothers or workers? The value of women’s labor: Women and the emergence of family allowance policy. Gender & Society12 (4): 376-399.
47.
Misra, Joya, Stephanie Moller, and Marina Karides. 2003. Envisioning dependency: Changing media descriptions of welfare in the 20th century. Social Problems50 (4): 482-504.
48.
O’Connor. Julia, Ann Orloff, and Sheila Shaver. 1999. States, markets, families: Gender, liberalism and social policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Purakayastha, Bandana, Manisha Desai, Mangala Subramaniam, and Sunita Bose. 2003. The study of gender in India: A partial review. Gender & Society17 (4): 503-524.
50.
Saguy, Abigail. 2003. What is sexual harassment: From Capital Hill to the Sorbonne. Berkeley: University of California Press.
51.
Siim, Birte. 2000. Gender and citizenship: Politics and agency in France, Britain, and Denmark. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52.
Springer, Kristen. 2003. Blaming pregnant drug users for the changing American family: The race and class privilege of motherhood. Paper presented at Annual Meetings, American Sociological Association, Atlanta, GA.
53.
Stark, Laura, and Hans-Peter Kohler. 2002. Ten years of low fertility debate in the German popular press. Paper presented at Annual Meetings, Council on European Studies, March 16, Chicago.
54.
Stasiulis, Daiva, and Nira Yuval-Davis. 1995. Unsettling settler societies: Articulations of gender, race, ethnicity and class. New York: Sage.
55.
Stone, Deborah. 1988. Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York: Norton.
56.
Stratigaki, Maria. 2004. The co-optation of gender concepts in EU policies: The case of “reconciliation of work and family.”Social Politics11:30-56.
57.
Sunday Mirror. 2002. Happiness is an early baby and a nice boss. 17 February.
58.
Sunday Times (London). 2000a. British babies die of neglect. 25 June.
59.
Sunday Times (London). 2000b. Call me a Eurosceptic, but give me Boston not Berlin. 10 December.
60.
Sunday Times (London). 2000c. “Timebomb” alert as births tumble. 16 January.
61.
Sunday Times (London). 2000d. Women pay for equality with rise in cancer. 9 July.
62.
Sunday Times (London). 2001. Sorry, baby, but our lifestyle comes first. 27 May.
63.
Sunday Times (London). 2002. A fear is born. 27 January.
64.
Times. 2000. Immigration will not ease our burden. 22 June.
65.
Sunday Times (London). 2000. Stars, status and the infant phenomenon. 26 July.
66.
Sunday Times (London). 2001. Breed or die out. 15 November.
67.
Sunday Times (London). 2002. A civilisation with no belief in its own values will collapse. 2 February.
68.
Sunday Times (London). 2002. Shrinking nations offer families cash for babies. 22 March.
69.
United Nations Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2000. Replacement migration: Is it a solution to declining and ageing populations?Report, March 21. New York: United Nations Population Division.
70.
United Nations Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2001. World population prospects: The 2000 revision. Report, February 28. New York: United Nations Population Divison.
71.
Yuval-Davis, Nira. 1997. Gender and nation. London: Sage.
