The author uses census data to assess the consequences of two alternative theoretical formulations of care work for understanding the intersections of gender, race, and economic inequalities in paid care. The nurturance conceptualization focuses on care as relationship while the reproductive labor framework includes both relational and nonrelational jobs that maintain and reproduce the labor force. An empirical application of both models to the labor market shows that placing increasing theoretical emphasis on nurturant care privileges the experiences of white women and excludes large numbers of very-low-wage workers from consideration.
Abel, Emily K., and Margaret K. Nelson. 1990. Circles of care: An introductory essay. In Circles of care: Work and identity in women’s lives, edited by Emily K. Abel and Margaret K. Nelson. Albany: State University of New York Press.
2.
Amott, Teresa, and Julie Matthaei. 1996. Race, gender, and work: A multicultural economic history of women in the United States. Boston: South End.
3.
Boydston, Jeanne. 1990. Home and work: Housework, wages, and the ideology of labor in the early republic. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
Cancian, Francesca M., and Stacey J. Oliker. 2000. Caring and gender. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
5.
Dalla Costa, Mariarosa. 1972. The power of women and the subversion of the community. Bristol, UK: Falling Wall Press.
6.
Danzinger, Sheldon, and Peter Gottschalk. 1995. America unequal. New York: Russell Sage.
7.
DeVault, Marjorie L.1991. Feeding the family: The social organization of caring as gendered work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Doeringer, Peter, and Michael Piore. 1985. Internal labor markets and manpower analysis. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
9.
England, Paula. 1992. Comparable worth: Theories and evidence. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
10.
England, Paula, Michelle Budig, and Nancy Folbre. 2002. Wages of virtue: The relative pay of care work. Social Problems49:455-473.
11.
Folbre, Nancy. 2001. The invisible heart: Economics and family values. New York: New Press.
12.
Hansen, Karen V., and Ilene J. Philipson. 1990. Women, class, and the feminist imagination: A socialistfeminist reader. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
13.
Harrington, Mona. 1999. Care and equality: Inventing a newfamily politics. New York: Alfred Knopf.
14.
Hartmann, Heidi I.[1976] 1990. Capitalism, patriarchy, and job segregation by sex. InWomen, class, and the feminist imagination: A socialist-feminist reader, edited by Karen V. Hansen and Ilene J. Philipson. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
15.
Heymann, Jody. 2002. Canworking families ever win? Helping parents succeed atwork and caregiving. Boston Review, March.
16.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, Pierrette. 2000. The international division of caring and cleaning work. In Care work: Gender, labor and the welfare state, edited by Madonna H. Meyer. New York: Routledge.
17.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, Pierrette. 2001. Doméstica: Immigrant workers cleaning and caring in the shadows of affluence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18.
Laslett, Barbara, and Johanna Brenner. 1989. Gender and social reproduction: Historical perspectives. Annual Review of Sociology15:381-404.
19.
Milkman, Ruth. 1998. The macrosociology of paid domestic labor. Work and Occupations25 (4): 483-510.
20.
Nakano Glenn, Evelyn. 1992. From servitude to service work: Historical continuities in the racial division of paid reproductive labor. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society18:1-43.
21.
Noddings, Nel, Suzanne Gordon, and Patricia Benner. 1996. Caregiving: Readings in knowledge, practice, ethics, and politics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
22.
Roberts, Dorothy. 1997. Spiritual and menial housework. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism9:51-80.
23.
Romero, Mary. 1992. Maid in the U.S.A.New York: Routledge.
24.
Ruggles, Steven, Matthew Sobek, et al. 1997. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 2.0. Minneapolis: Historical Census Projects, University of Minnesota. Available from http://www.ipums.org.
25.
Russell Hochschild, Arlie. 1998. Ideals of care: Traditional, postmodern, cold-modern, and warmmodern. In Families in the U.S.: Kinship and domestic politics, edited by Karen V. Hansen and Anita Ilta Garey. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
26.
Secombe, Wally. 1974. The housewife and her labour under capitalism. New Left Review83:3-24.
27.
Stone, Deborah. 2000. Why we need a care movement. The Nation, 13 March.
28.
Tronto, Joan. 1993. Moral boundaries: Apolitical argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.
29.
Tronto, Joan. 1998. An ethic of care. Generations22:15-20.
30.
Tronto, Joan. 2002. The “nanny” question in feminism. Hypatia17:34-51.
31.
Tronto, Joan, and Berenice Fisher. 1990. Towards a feminist theory of caring. In Circles of care: Work and identity in women’s lives, edited by Emily K. Abel and Margaret K. Nelson. Albany: State University of New York Press.
32.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1992. Classified index of industries and occupations, 1990 Census of population and housing. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
33.
U.S. Department of Labor. 1977. Dictionary of occupational titles. 4th ed.Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
