Studies document that in wartime, states often employ maternal imagery and mobilize women as mothers.Yet we know relatively little about when and why states and their opposition do so. This study seeks to build theory for this phenomenon through frame analysis of the Nicaraguan Contra War. The author proposes that maternal framing, aimed at mothers as well as a broader national and international audience, benefits militaries in at least three ways: (1) channeling maternal grievances, (2) disseminating propaganda through “apolitical” mothers, and (3) evoking emotions and sympathy nationally and internationally. This study furthermore explores three underexamined features of both gendered studies of war and frame analysis: (1) It applies frame theory to states, (2) it develops our understanding of crossnational gendered framing strategies, and (3) it introduces gender framing to the study of war.
Alvarez, Sonia E.1990. Engendering democracy in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
Baldez, Lisa. 2002. Why women protest: Women’s movements in Chile. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Bayard deVolo, Lorraine. 2001. Mothers of Heroes and Martyrs: Gender identity politics in Nicaragua, 1979-1999.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
4.
Bayard deVolo, Lorraine. 2003. Analyzing politics and change inwomen’s organizations: Nicaraguan mothers’voice and identity. International Feminist Journal of Politics5:92-115.
5.
Beckwith, Karen. 2001. Gender frames and collective action: Configurations of masculinity in the Pittston coal strike. Politics & Society29 (2): 297-330.
6.
Collinson, Helen. 1990. Women and revolution in Nicaragua. London: Zed.
7.
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1987. Women and war. New York: Basic Books.
8.
Enloe, Cynthia. 2000. Maneuvers: The militarization of women’s lives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9.
Friedman, Elisabeth. 1998. Paradoxes of gendered political opportunity in the Venezuelan transition to democracy. Latin American Research Review33:87-135.
10.
Goldstein, Joshua. 2001. War and gender. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
González, Victoria. 2001. Somocista women, right-wing politics, and feminism in Nicaragua, 1936-1979. In Radical women in Latin America: Left and right, edited by Victoria González and Karen Kampwirth. College Park, PA: Penn State Press.
12.
Goodwin, Jeff, James M. Jasper, and Francesca Poletta. 2001. Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Gray, Spalding. 1992. Monster in a box. Compact sound disk, disk 1. MillValley, CA: Gang of Seven.
14.
Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Cornell, NY: Cornell University Press.
15.
Koonz, Claudia. 1987. Mothers in the fatherland: Women, the family, and Nazi politics. New York: St. Martin’s.
16.
Lancaster, Roger N.1992. Life is hard: Machismo, danger, and the intimacy of power in Nicaragua. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
Manchanda, Rita. 2001. Women, war and peace in South Asia. New Delhi, India: Sage.
18.
McAdam, Doug, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald. 1996. Introduction: Opportunities, mobilizing structures, and framing processes. In Comparative perspectives on social movements, edited by Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Molyneux, Maxine. 1985. Mobilization without emancipation? Women’s interests, the state, and revolution in Nicaragua. Feminist Studies11:227-254.
20.
Nagel, Joane. 1998. Masculinity and nationalism: Gender and sexuality in the making of nations. Ethnic and Racial Studies21:242-269.
21.
Navarro, Marysa. 1989. The personal is political: Las Madres de Plaza de Mayo. In Power and popular protest, edited by Susan Eckstein. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
Noonan, Rita K.1995. Women against the state: Political opportunities and collective action frames in Chile’s transition to democracy. Sociological Forum10:81-111.
23.
Power, Margaret. 2002. Right-wing women in Chile: Feminine power and the struggle against Allende, 1964-1973.College Park, PA: Penn State Press.
24.
Robnett, Belinda. 1997. How long? How long? African-American women in the struggle for civil rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
Rupp, Leila J.1978. Mobilizing women for war: German and American propaganda, 1939-1945. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
Snow, David A., and Robert D. Benford. 1988. Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. In From structure to action, edited by Bert Klandermans, Hanspeter Kriesi, and Sidney G. Tarrow. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
27.
Snow, David A., and Robert D. Benford. 1992. Master frames and cycles of protest. In Frontiers in social movement theory, edited by Aldon D. Morris and Carol McClurg Mueller. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28.
Stephen, Lynn. 1997. Women and social movements in Latin America: Power from below. Austin: University of Texas.
29.
Swerdlow, Amy. 1993. Women strike for peace: Traditional motherhood and radical politics in the 1960s. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Tarrow, Sidney. 1998. Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Taylor, Verta. 1999. Gender and social movements: Gender processes inwomen’s self-help movements. Gender & Society13:8-33.
32.
Taylor, Verta, and Leila J. Rupp. 2002. Loving internationalism: The emotion culture of transnational women’s organizations, 1888-1945. Mobilization7 (2): 141-158.
33.
West, Guida, and Rhoda Lois Blumberg. 1990. Women and social protest. New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
Zeiger, Susan. 1996. She didn’t raise her boy to be a slacker: Motherhood, conscription, and the culture of the First World War. Feminist Studies22:7-39.
