This article draws on ethnographic research with a nonprofit foster family agency to examine how payment affects caregivers’motivations and performance, as well as how state bureaucratic organization and professional supervision affect their carework. Findings suggest that contrary to conventional thought, economic interests and altruistic motives coexist for foster mothers. Although monetary compensation is a concern for these mostly working-class women, impetus for caring also stems from traditional gendered ideals of mothering, nurturing, and staying at home with their biological children. However, state regulations and rules (designed to protect children) intervene in foster mothers’parenting and private lives and undermine their intrinsic motivations and rewards. The conclusion reflects on what this case reveals about the challenges of paid carework, especially under conditions of government supervision and regulation.
Abel, Emily
, and Margaret Nelson. 1990. Circles of care: Work and identity in women’s lives. Albany: State University of New York Press.
2.
The Alliance for Children’s Rights
. 2004. Children’s court project. Los Angeles: The Alliance for Children’s Rights. Available from http://www.kids-alliance.org/programs/childrens_court_project.asp.
3.
Anderson, Troy
. 2003. Foster system among worst. Pasadena Star-News, 28 December.
4.
Barbell, Kathy
. 1999. The impact of financial compensation, benefits, and supports on foster parent retention and recruitment. Available from http://casanet.org/library/foster-care/finance.htm.
5.
Burawoy, Michael
. 1991. Ethnography unbound: Power and resistance in the modern metropolis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
Cancian, Francesca
. 2000. Paid emotional care: Organizational forms that encourage nurturance. In Care work, edited by M. Harrington Meyer. London: Routledge.
7.
Cancian, Francesca
, and S. Oliker. 2000. Caring and gender. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
8.
Christensen, Kathleen
. 1987. Women, families and home based employment. In Families and work, edited by N. Gerstel and H. E. Gross. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
9.
England, Paula
, M. Budig, and N. Folbre. 2002. Wages of virtue: The relative pay of carework. Social Problems49 (4): 455-473.
10.
Evers, Alabert
, MarjaPijl, and Clare Ungerson. 1994. Payments for care. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate Press.
11.
Folbre, Nancy
. 2001. Invisible heart: Economic and family values. New York: New Press.
12.
Folbre, Nancy
, and Julie Nelson. 2000. For love or money—Or both?Journal of Economic Perspectives14 (4): 123-140.
13.
Frankenberg, Ruth
. 1993. White women, race matters: The social construction of whiteness. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
14.
Gelles, Richard
. 1996. The book of David: How preserving families can cost children’s lives. New York: Basic Books.
15.
Glazer, Nathan
. 1988. The limits of social policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
Harrington Meyer, Madonna
. 2000. Care work: Gender, labor and welfare states. New York: Routledge.
17.
Hays, Sharon
. 1996. The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18.
Hochschild, Arlie
. 1989. The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking.
19.
Hooyman, Nancy
, and Judith Gonyea. 1995. Feminist perspectives on family care: Politics for gender justice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Kohn, Melvin
. 1969. Class and conformity: A study in values. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
21.
Lareau, Annette
. 2003. Unequal childhoods: Class, race and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
Lasch, Christopher
. 1977. Haven in a heartless world. New York: Basic Books.
23.
Michel, Sonya
. 2000. Claiming the right to care. In Care work, edited by M. Harrington Meyer. New York: Routledge.
24.
Mortimer, Jeylan
, and Jon Lorence. 1995. Social psychology of work. In Sociological perspectives on social psychology, edited by K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, and J. S. House. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Nelson, Julie
. 1999. Of markets and martyrs: Is it OK to pay well for care?Feminist Economics5(3): 43-59.
27.
Nelson, Margaret
. 1990. Negotiated care: The experience of family day care providers. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
28.
Newman, Katherine
. 1993. Declining fortunes: The withering of the American dream. New York: Basic Books.
29.
Romero, Mary
. 1992. Maid in the USA. New York: Routledge.
30.
Rubin, Lillian
. 1994. Families on the fault line. New York: HarperCollins.
31.
Stacey, Judith
. 1990. Brave new families: Stories of domestic upheaval in late 20th century America. New York: Basic Books.
32.
Stack, Carol
. 1974. All our kin: Strategies for survival in a Black community. New York: Harper and Row.
33.
Ungerson, Claire
. 1990. Gender and caring: Work and welfare in Britain and Scandinavia. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
34.
Uttal, Lynet
. 1996. Custodial care, surrogate care, and coordinated care: Employed mothers and the meaning of child care. Gender & Society10:291-311.
35.
Uttal, Lynet
. 1999. Using kin for childcare: Embedment in the socioeconomic networks of extended families. Journal of Marriage and the Family61 (4): 845-857.
36.
Waerness, Kari
. 1984. Caring as women’s work in the welfare state. In Patriarchy in a welfare society, edited by H. Holter. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
37.
Waerness, Kari
. 1996. The rationality of caring. In Caregiving, edited by S. Gordan, P. Benner, and N. Noddings. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
