Based on data from a national survey and personal interviews with more than 300 religiously committed Protestants, this analysis assesses the range and location of attitudes toward feminism among conservative Protestants. Findings suggest that evangelicals are not uniformly antifeminist. Rather, the majority are both supportive and appreciative of the gains of liberal feminism as well as concerned that feminism has gotten off track by promoting an excessive individualism that undermines stable, meaningful, and caring relationships. For most evangelicals, feminism is neither a significant subcultural religious boundary nor a focus of political mobilization or action. Political conservatism, embeddedness in conservative local religious subcultures, belief in husbands’ headship and authority, and affiliation with particular subgroups and denominations help to locate and specify the sources that create, reinforce, and sustain more negative attitudes toward feminism within this diverse religious subculture.
Ammerman, N. T.1987. Bible believers: Fundamentalists in the modern world. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
2.
Bartkowski, J. P.2001. Remaking the godly marriage: Gender negotiation in evangelical families. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
3.
Bartkowski, J. P.2004. The Promise Keepers: Servants, soldiers and godly men. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
4.
Bendroth, M. L.1993. Fundamentalism and gender, 1875 to the present. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5.
Bloch, J. P.2000. The new and improved Clint Eastwood: Change and persistence in Promise Keepers self-help literature. Sociology of Religion61:11-31.
6.
Brasher, B.1998. Godly women: Fundamentalism and female power. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
7.
Brown, K. M.1994. Fundamentalism and the control of women. In Fundamentalism and gender, edited by J. S. Hawley. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
Chaves, M.1994. Ordaining women: Culture and conflict in religious organizations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
Diamond, S.1989. Spiritual warfare: The politics of the Christian Right. Boston: South End.
10.
Emerson, M. O., and C. Smith. 2000. Divided by faith: Evangelical religion and the problems of race in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
Fields, E. E.1991. Understanding activist fundamentalism: Capitalist crisis and the “colonization of the lifeworld.”Sociological Analysis52:175-190.
12.
Gallagher, S. K.2003. Evangelical identity and gendered family life. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
13.
Gallagher, S. K. In press. The marginalization of evangelical feminism. Sociology of Religion.
14.
Gallagher, S. K., and C. Smith. 1999. Symbolic traditionalism and pragmatic egalitarianism: Contemporary evangelicals, families and gender. Gender & Society13:211-233.
15.
Griffith, R. M.1997. God’s daughters: Evangelical women and the power of submission. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
Hardesty, N.1999. Women called to witness: Evangelical feminism in the nineteenth century. 2d ed.Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
17.
Heath, M.2003. Soft-boiled masculinity: Renegotiating gender and racial ideologies in the Promise Keepers movement. Gender & Society17: 423-444.
18.
Horner, S. S. 2000. Becoming all we’re meant to be: A social history of the contemporary evangelical feminist movement. A case study of the Evangelical and Ecumenical Women’s Caucus. Ph.D. diss., Northwestern University.
19.
Jorstad, E.1987. The new Christian Right 1981-1988: Prospects for the post-Reagan decade. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen.
20.
Klatch, R.1987. Women of the new Right. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
21.
Lockhart, W. H.2000.“We are one life,” but not of one gender ideology: Unity, ambiguity, and the Promise Keepers. Sociology of Religion61:73-92.
22.
Manning, C. J.1999. God gave us the right: Conservative Catholic, evangelical Protestant, and Orthodox Jewish women grapple with feminism. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
23.
Messner, M. A.1997. Politics of masculinities: Men in movements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Messner, M. A., and C. Anderson. 1998. Miles to go before they sleep: What do Promise Keepers promise. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Pacific Sociological Association, San Francisco, April.
25.
Moen, M. C.1994. From revolution to evolution: The changing nature of the Christian Right. Sociological Analysis55:345-357.
26.
Peshkin, A.1986. God’s choice: The total world of a fundamentalist Christian school. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Pevey, C., C. Williams, and C. G. Ellison. 1996. Male God imagery and female submission: Lessons from a Southern Baptist ladies’ Bible class. Qualitative Sociology18:173-193.
28.
Scanzoni, L. D., and N. A. Hardesty. 1992. All we’re meant to be: Biblical feminism for today. 3d ed.Nashville, TN: Abington Press.
29.
Smith, C.2000. Christian America? What evangelicals really want. Berkeley: University of California Press.
30.
Smith, C., with M. Emerson,S. K. Gallagher, P. Kennedy, and D. Sikkink. 1998. American evangelicals: Embattled and thriving. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
