This article explores the effect of women’s movement into the labor market on the gender segregation of work, using the Current Population Survey from 1972 to 1993. The author includes as working those respondents who were “keeping house” and codes keeping house as an occupation. The results show higher estimates of gender segregation, and slightly steeper declines over time, than were seen in previous studies. Analysis of one-year longitudinal changes reveals less movement out of female-dominated occupations when keeping house is included as an occupation. Finally, a decomposition of the segregation trend shows that the movement of women away from keeping house contributed as much to the overall decline in gender segregation as did the desegregation of paid occupations. The author concludes that the movement of women’s work from the household to the labor market has been a driving force in the changing nature of gender inequality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Batalova, Jeanne A., and Philip N. Cohen. 2002. Premarital cohabitation and housework: Couples in cross-national perspective. Journal of Marriage and the Family64 (3): 743-755.
2.
Baunach, Dawn M. 2002. Trends in occupational sex segregation and inequality, 1950 to 1990. Social Science Research31 (1): 77-98.
3.
Berk, Sarah F. 1985. The gender factory: The apportionment of work in American households. New York: Plenum.
4.
Bianchi, Suzanne M., Melissa A. Milkie, Liana C. Sayer, and John P. Robinson. 2000. Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces79 (1): 191-228.
5.
Blau, Francine D., Patricia Simpson, and Deborah Anderson. 1998. Continuing progress? Trends in occupational segregation in the United States over the 1970s and 1980s. Feminist Economics4 (3): 29-71.
6.
Bose, Christine E., and Peter H. Rossi. 1983. Gender and jobs: Prestige standings of occupations as affected by gender. American Sociological Review48 (3): 316-330.
7.
Budig, Michelle J., and Paula England. 2001. The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review66 (2): 204-225.
8.
Chafetz, Janet S. 1991. The gender division of labor and the reproduction of female disadvantage: Toward an integrated theory. In Gender, family, and economy: The triple overlap, edited by Rae L. Blumberg. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.
Chang, Mariko L. 2000. The evolution of sex segregation regimes. American Journal of Sociology105 (6): 1658-1701.
10.
Cohen, Philip N. 1998. Replacing housework in the service economy: Gender, class, and race-ethnicity in service spending. Gender & Society12 (2): 219-231.
11.
Cohen, Philip N., and Suzanne M. Bianchi. 1999. Marriage, children, and women’s employment: What do we know? Monthly Labor Review122 (12): 22-31.
12.
Cohen, Philip N., and Matt L. Huffman. 2003. Individuals, jobs, and labor markets: The devaluation of women’s work. American Sociological Review68 (3): 443-463.
13.
Coltrane, Scott. 2000. Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family62 (4): 1208-1233.
14.
Cotter, David A., JoAnn DeFiore, Joan M. Hermsen, Brenda M. Kowalewski, and Reeve Vanneman. 1997. All women benefit: The macro-level effect of occupational integration on gender earnings equality. American Sociological Review62 (5): 714-734.
15.
Cotter, David A., JoAnn DeFiore, Joan M. Hermsen, Brenda M. Kowalewski, and Reeve Vanneman. 1995. Occupational gender desegregation in the 1980s. Work and Occupations22 (1): 3-21.
16.
Cotter, David A., Joan M. Hermsen, and Reeve Vanneman. 2001. Women’s work and working women: The demand for female labor. Gender & Society15 (3): 429-452.
17.
Cowan, Ruth S. 1983. More work for mother: The ironies of household technology from the open hearth to the microwave. New York: Basic Books.
18.
Durand, John D. 1946. Married women in the labor force. American Journal of Sociology52(3): 217-223.
19.
Folbre, Nancy, and Marjorie Abel. 1989. Women’s work and women’s households: Gender bias in the U.S. census. Social Research56 (3): 545-569.
20.
Folbre, Nancy, and J. A. Nelson. 2000. For love or money—or both? Journal of Economic Perspectives14 (4): 123-140.
21.
Folbre, Nancy, and B. Wagman. 1993. Counting housework: New estimates of real product in the United States, 1800-1860. Journal of Economic History53 (2): 275-288.
22.
Glenn, Evelyn Nakano. 1992. From servitude to service work: Historical continuities in the racial division of paid reproductive labor. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society18 (1): 1-43.
23.
Goldin, Claudia. 1990. Understanding the gender gap: An economic history of American women. New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
Hartmann, Heidi. 1981. The unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism: Towards a more progressive union. In Women and revolution: A discussion of the unhappy marriage of Marxism and Feminism, edited by Lydia Sargent. Boston: South End.
25.
Hochschild, Arlie R., and Anne Machung. 1989. The second shift. New York: Avon Books.
26.
Huber, Joan. 1991. A theory of family, economy, and gender. In Gender, family, and economy: The triple overlap, edited by Rae L. Blumberg. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
Jacobs, Jerry A. 1989. Revolving doors: Sex segregation and women’s careers. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
28.
Kyrk, Hazel. 1947. Who works and why. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science251: 44-52.
29.
Lorber, Judith. 1994. Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30.
Madrian, Brigitte C., and Lars J. Lefgren. 1999. A note on longitudinally matching Current Population Survey respondents. Technical working paper 247. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
31.
Miller, Joanne, and Howard H. Garrison. 1982. Sex-roles: The division of labor at home and in the workplace. Annual Review of Sociology8: 237-262.
32.
Nelson, Robert L., and William P. Bridges. 1999. Legalizing gender inequality: Courts, markets, and unequal pay for women in America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Oppenheimer, Valerie K. 1970. The female labor force in the United States: Demographic and economic factors governing its growth and changing composition. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.
34.
Presser, Harriet B. 1999. Demographics: Toward a 24-hour economy. Science284 (5421): 1778-1779.
35.
Reskin, Barbara. 1993. Sex segregation in the workplace. Annual Review of Sociology19: 241-270.
36.
Reskin, Barbara F., and Heidi I. Hartmann, eds. 1986. Women’s work, men’s work: Sex segregation on the job. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
37.
Sayer, Liana C. 2001. Trends and gender differences in men’s and women’s time use: The relationship between time in market and nonmarket work and time for leisure. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Population Association of America, Washington, DC.
38.
Stacey, Judith. 1993. Good riddance to the family: Response. Journal of Marriage and the Family55 (3): 545-547.
39.
Strasser, Susan. 1982. Never done: A history of American housework. New York: Pantheon.
40.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2000. Current Population Survey technical paper 62: Design and methodology. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
41.
Uttal, Lynet. 2002. Making care work: Employed mothers in the new childcare market. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
42.
Waring, Marilyn. 1988. If women counted: A new feminist economics. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
43.
Waring, Marilyn. 1999. Counting for nothing: What men value and what women are worth. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
44.
Wells, Thomas. 1999. Changes in occupational sex segregation during the 1980s and 1990s. Social Science Quarterly80 (2): 370-380.
