This article discusses three major dilemmas embedded in women's labor migration by focusing on undocumented Latina migrants in Israel. The first is that to break the cycle of blocked mobility in their homelands, migrant women must take jobs that they would have never taken in their countries of origin, despite uncertainty about possible economic outcomes. The second dilemma is that the search for economic betterment leads Latina migrants to risk living and working illegally in the host country, forcing them to remain on the margins of society. The third dilemma relates to the role of mothers who, to secure a better future for their children, are forced to leave them behind, thus subverting the traditional definition of motherhood. The absence of an egalitarian notion and the practice of citizenship for non-Jews leave undocumented labor migrants in Israel without prospects for incorporation into the society.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alicea, M. 1997. A chambered nautilus: The contradictory nature of Puerto Rican women's role in the social construction of a transnational community. Gender & Society5:597-626.
2.
Bartram, D. 1998. Foreign workers in Israel: History and theory. International Migration Review32:303-325.
3.
Bernstein, D. 1986. The subcontracting of cleaning work: A case in the casualisation of labour. Sociological Review34:396-422.
4.
Boyd, M. 1984. At a disadvantage: The occupational attainment of foreign-born women in Canada. International Migration Review18:1091-1120.
5.
Castles, S. 2000. Ethnicity and globalization. London: Sage.
6.
Chant, S. 1992. Gender and migration in developing countries. New York: Belhaven.
7.
Chant, S., and S. A. Radcliffe. 1992. Migration and development: The importance of gender. In Gender and migration in developing countries, edited by Sylvia Chant. New York: Belhaven.
8.
Cheng, S. A. 1996. Migrant women domestic workers in Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan: A comparative analysis. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal5:139-152.
9.
Cheng, S. A.. 2003. Rethinking the globalization of domestic service: Foreign domestics, state control and the politics of identity in Taiwan. Gender & Society17 (2): 166-186.
10.
Glenn, E. Nakano. 1986. Issei, Nisei, warbride. Philadelphia: Temple University.
11.
Glenn, E. Nakano. 1994. Social constructions of mothering: A thematic overview. In Mothering: Ideology, experience, and agency, edited by Evelyn Nakano Glenn, Grace Chang, and Linda Rennie Forcey. New York: Routledge.
12.
Hagan, J. M. 1998. Social networks, gender, and immigrant incorporation: Resources and constraints. American Sociological Review63:55-67.
13.
Hochschild, A. R. 2000. The nanny chain. American Prospect4:32-36.
14.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. 1992. Overcoming patriarchal constraints: The reconstruction of gender among Mexican immigrant women and men. Gender & Society6:393-415.
15.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, P.. 1994. Gendered transitions: Mexican experiences of immigration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, P.. 2001. Domestica. Immigrant workers cleaning and caring in the shadows of affluence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, P., and E. Avila. 1997. I'm here, but I'm there. The meanings of Latina transnational motherhood. Gender & Society11:548-571.
18.
Kemp, A., R. Raijman, J. Resnik, and S. Schammah-Gesser. 2000. Contesting the limits of political participation: Latinos and Black African migrant workers in Israel. Ethnic and Racial Studies23 (1): 94-119.
19.
Lijphart, A., and C. Waisman. 1996. Institutional design in new democracies in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Boulder, CO: Westview.
20.
Lim, L. L. 1993. Effects of women's position on their migration. In Women's position and demographic change, edited by N. Federici, K. Oppenheim Mason, and Solvi Sogner. New York: Clarendon.
21.
Massey, D., J. Arango, G. Hugo, A. Kouaouci, A. Pellegrino, and J. Taylor. 1998. Worlds in motion. Understanding international migration at the end of the millennium. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
Morokvasic, M. 1984. Birds of passage are also women. International Migration Review18:886-907.
23.
Mualam, M., and R. Sinay. 2003. Wounded foreign workers were afraid of being arrested and hid from the policemen. Ha'aretz, 6 January.
24.
Pedraza, S. 1991. Women and migration: The social consequences of gender. Annual Review of Sociology17:303-325.
25.
Pessar, P. 1999. Engendering migration studies. American Behavioral Scientist42:577-600.
26.
Phizacklea, A. 1983. One way ticket: Migration and female labor. Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
27.
Piore, M. 1979. Birds of passage: Migrant labor in industrial societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Raijman, R., and A. Kemp. 2002. State and non-state actors: A multi-layered analysis of labor migration policy in Israel. In Public policy in Israel, edited by D. Korn. London: Lexington Books.
29.
Raijman, R., and A. Kemp. Forthcoming. Consuming the Holy Spirit in the Holy Land: Evangelical churches, labor migrants and the Jewish state. In Consumption and market society in Israel, edited by Y. Carmeli and K. Applebaum. Oxford, UK: Berg.
30.
Raijman, R., A. Kemp, S. Gesser, and J. Resnik. 2001. Searching for a better future: Latino labor migration. Discussion paper 105. Tel Aviv, Israel: Tel Aviv University, Golda Meir Institute for Social & Labor Research.
31.
Raijman, R., and M. Semyonov. 1997. Gender, ethnicity and immigration: Double-disadvantage and triple-disadvantage among recent immigrant women in the Israeli labor market. Gender & Society11 (1): 108-125.
32.
Remennick, L. 1999. Women with a Russian accent in Israel: On the gender aspects of migration. European Journal of Women's Studies6 (4): 441-461.
33.
Repak, T. A. 1994. Labor and the lure of the capital: Central American migrants in Washington, DC. Gender & Society8:507-524.
34.
Robinson, K. 1991. Housemaids: The effects of gender and culture on the internal and international labor migration of Indonesian women. In Intersexions: Gender/class/culture/ethnicity, edited by Gill Bottomley, Marie de Lepervanche, and Jeannie Martin. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
35.
Salazar Parreñas, R. 2000. Migrant Filipina domestic workers and the international division of reproductive labor. Gender & Society14 (4): 560-581.
36.
Salazar Parreñas, R. 2001. Servants of globalization: Women, migration, and domestic work. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
37.
Salzinger, L. 1991. Maid by any other name: The transformation of “dirty work” by Central American immigrants. In Ethnography unbound: Power and resistance in the modern metropolis, edited by Michael Burawoyet al. Berkeley: University of California Press.
38.
Schammah-Gesser, S., R. Raijman, A. Kemp, and J. Reznik. 2000. “Making it” in Israel? Non-Jewish Latino undocumented migrant workers in the Holy Land. Estudios interdisciplinarios de America Latina y el Caribe11 (2): 113-136.
39.
Stark, O. 1991. The migration of labor. Cambridge, UK: Basil Blackwell.
40.
Tienda, M., and K. Booth. 1991. Gender, migration and social change. International Sociology6:51-72.
41.
Truong, T. 1996. Gender, international migration and social reproduction: Implications for theory, policy, research and networking. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal5:27-52.
42.
Wainerman, C., E. Jelin, and M. del C. Feijoo. 1983. Del deber ser y el hacer de las mujeres. Mexico City: El Colegio de Mexico, Pispal.
43.
Wong, D. 1996. Foreign domestic workers in Singapore. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal5:117-138.
