Recently, the study of gender has focused on processes by which gender is brought into social relations through interaction. This article explores implications of a two-sided dynamic—gendering practices and practicing of gender—for understanding gendering processes in formal organizations. Using stories from interviews and participant observation in multinational corporations, the author explores the practicing of gender at work. She defines practicing gender as a moving phenomenon that is done quickly, directionally (in time), and (often) nonreflexively; is informed (often) by liminal awareness; and is in concert with others. She notes how other conceptions of gender dynamics and practice inform the analysis and argues that adequate conceptualization (and potential elimination) of harmful aspects of gendering practices/practicing will require attention to (1) agency, intentionality, awareness, and reflexivity; (2) positions, power, and experience; and (3) choice, accountability, and audience. She calls for incorporating the “sayings and doings” of gender into organization theory and research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Acker, Joan. 1990. Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society4:139-158.
2.
Acker, Joan. 1998. The future of “gender and organizations”: Connections and boundaries. Gender, Work and Organization5 (4): 195-206.
3.
Ahearn, Linda. 2001. Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology30:109-137.
4.
Barnes, Barry. 2001. Practice as collective action. In The practice turn in contemporary theory, edited by Theodore S. Schatzki, Karin Knorr Cetina, and Eike Von Savigny. New York: Routledge.
5.
Baron, James N., and William Bielby. 1985. Organizational barriers to gender equality: Sex segregation of jobs and opportunities. In Gender and the life course, edited by Alice S. Rossi. New York: Aldine.
6.
Baron, James N., and William Bielby. 1986. The proliferation of job titles in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly31:561-586.
7.
Bickham Mendez, Jennifer, and Diane Wolf. 2001. Where feminist theory meets feminist practice: Border-crossing in a transnational academic feminist organization. Organization8 (4): 723-750.
8.
Bielby, William T., and James N. Baron. 1986. Men and women at work: Sex segregation and statistical discrimination. American Journal of Sociology91:759-799.
9.
Bird, Sharon R. 1996. Welcome to the men's club: Homosociality and the maintenance of hegemonic masculinity. Gender & Society10:120-132.
10.
Bird, Sharon R. 2001. Masculinities and men's social relations at work. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Southern Sociological Society, Atlanta.
11.
Bologh, Roslyn Wallach. 1990. Love or greatness: Max Weber and masculine thinking: A feminist inquiry. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
12.
Bourdieu, Pierre. [1980] 1990. The logic of practice, translated by Richard Nice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13.
Britton, Dana. 1999. Cat fights and gang fights: Preference for work in a male-dominated organization. Sociological Quarterly40 (3): 455-474.
14.
—. 2000. The epistemology of the gendered organization. Gender & Society14 (3): 418-434.
15.
Bruni, Attila, Silvia Gherardi, and Barbara Poggio. Forthcoming. Gender and entrepreneurship: An ethnographic approach. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
16.
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
17.
Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.” New York: Routledge.
18.
Calas, Marta B., and Linda Smircich. 1992. Re-writing gender into organizational theorizing: Directions from feminist perspectives. In Re-thinking organization: New directions in organizational research, edited by M. I. Reed and M. D. Hughes. London: Sage.
19.
Calas, Marta B., and Linda Smircich. 1997. Predicando la moral en calzoncillos? Feminist inquiries into business ethics. In Women's studies and business ethics: Toward a new conversation, edited by Edward Freeman and Andrea Larson. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
Campbell, Hugh. 2000. The glass phallus: Pub(lic) masculinity and drinking in rural New Zealand. Rural Sociology65 (4): 562-581.
21.
Cassirer, Naomi, and Barbara F. Reskin. 2000. High hopes: Organizational position, employment experiences, and women's and men's promotion aspirations. Work and Occupations27 (4): 438-463.
22.
Cockburn, Cynthia. 1988. Machinery of dominance: Women, men and technical know-how. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
23.
Collinson, David, and Jeff Hearn. 1994. Naming men as men: Implications for work, organization, and management. Gender, Work and Organization1:2-22.
24.
Collinson, David, and Jeff Hearn. 1996. Breaking the silence: On men, masculinities, and managements. In Men as managers, managers as men: Critical perspectives on men, masculinities, and managements, edited by David L. Collinson and Jeff Hearn. London: Sage.
25.
Collinson, Margaret, and David Collinson. 1996. “It's only Dick”: The sexual harassment of women managers in insurance sales. Work, Employment, and Society10:29-56.
26.
Connell, Robert. 1987. Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
27.
Connell, Robert. 1995. Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
28.
Connell, Robert. 2000. The men and the boys. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
Cotter, David A., Joan M. Hermsen, Seth Ovadia, and Reece Vanneman. 2001. The glass ceiling effect. Social Forces80 (2): 655-681.
30.
Czarniawska, Barbara. 1998. A narrative approach to organization studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Dahms, Harry. Forthcoming. Globalization as hyper-alienation: Critiques of traditional Marxism as arguments for basic income. In Current perspectives in social theory, vol. 23, edited by Jennifer Lehmann. Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier.
32.
Dellinger, Kirsten, and Christine L. Williams. 2002. The locker room and the dorm room: Workplace norms and the boundaries of sexual harassment in magazine editing. Social Problems49 (2): 242-257.
33.
Dorsey, David. 1994. The force. New York: Ballantine.
34.
Ely, Robin J., and Debra E. Meyerson. 2000. Theories of gender in organizations: A new approach to organizational analysis and change. Research in Organizational Behavior27:105-153.
35.
Ferguson, Kathy. 1997. Postmodernism, feminism and organizational ethics: Letting difference be. In Women's studies and business ethics: Toward a new conversation, edited by Edward Freeman and Andrea Larson. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
Ferree, Myra Marx, and Beth Hess. 2000. Controversy and coalition: The new feminist movement across three decades of change. 3d ed. New York: Routledge.
37.
Fiske, Susan. 1993. Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist48 (6): 621-628.
38.
Fletcher, Joyce. 1999. Disappearing acts: Gender, power, and relational practice at work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39.
Gerson, Kathleen. 1993. No man's land: Men's changing commitments to family and work. New York: Basic Books.
40.
Gherardi, Silvia, and Barbara Poggio. 2001. Creating and recreating gender in organizations. Journal of World Business36 (3): 245-259.
41.
Gordon, David M. 1996. Fat and mean: The corporate squeeze of working Americans and the myth of managerial “downsizing.” New York: Martin Kessler Books.
42.
Gruber, James E. 1998. The impact of male work environments and organizational policies on women's experiences of sexual harassment. Gender & Society12 (3): 301-320.
43.
Harding, Sandra. 1997. Comment on Hekman's “Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society22:382-391.
44.
Hearn, Jeff. 1993. Emotive subjects: Organizational men, organizational masculinities, and the (de)construction of “emotions.” In Emotion in organizations, edited by Stephen Fineman. London: Sage.
45.
Hedström, Peter, and Richard Swedberg. 1998. Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Hill Collins, Patricia. 1997. Comment on Hekman's “Truth and method: Feminist standpoint theory revisited”: Where's the power? Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society22 (2): 375-381.
47.
Jackman, Mary R. 1994. The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
48.
Jacques, Roy. 1997. The unbearable whiteness of being: Reflections of a pale, stale male. In Managing the organizational melting pot: Dilemmas of workplace diversity, edited by Pushkala Prasad, Albert Mills, Michael Elmes, and Anshuman Parsad. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
Kerfoot, Deborah, and David Knights. 1996. “The best is yet to come?”: The quest for embodiment in managerial work. In Men as managers, managers as men: Critical perspectives on men, masculinities, and managements, edited by D. L. Collinson and J. Hearn. London: Sage.
50.
Kerfoot, Deborah, and David Knights. 1998. Managing masculinity in contemporary organizational life: A “man”agerial project. Organization5:7-26.
51.
Kondo, Dorrine. 1990. Crafting selves: Power, gender, and discourses of identity in a Japanese factory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
52.
Leidner, Robin. 1991. Serving hamburgers and selling insurance: Gender, work, and identity in interactive service jobs. Gender & Society5:154-177.
53.
Lipman-Blumen, Jean. 1976. Toward a homosocial theory of sex roles: An explanation of sex segregation in social institutions. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society1 (spring,pt.2): 15-31.
Lorber, Judith. 1984. Women physicians: Career, status and power. London: Tavistock.
56.
Lorber, Judith. 1994. Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
57.
Lorber, Judith. 1996. Beyond the binaries: Depolarizing the categories of sex, sexuality, and gender. Sociological Inquiry66:143-159.
58.
Lorber, Judith. 1999. Crossing borders and erasing boundaries: Paradoxes of identity politics. Sociological Focus32 (4): 355-370.
59.
Lorber, Judith. 2000. Using gender to undo gender: A feminist degendering movement. Feminist Theory1 (1): 101-118.
60.
Maier, Mark, and James W. Messerschmidt. 1998. Commonalities, conflicts, and contradictions in organizational masculinities: Exploring the gendered genesis of the Challenger disaster. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology35 (3): 325-344.
61.
Martin, Joanne. 1990. Deconstructing organizational taboos: The suppression of gender conflict in organizations. Organization Science1:1-21.
62.
Martin, Joanne. 1994. The organization of exclusion: Institutionalization of sex inequality, gendered faculty jobs and gendered knowledge in organization theory and research. Organization1 (2): 401-432.
63.
Martin, Joanne, and Kathleen Knopoff. 1997. The gendered implications of apparently gender-neutral theory: Re-reading Max Weber. In Women's studies and business ethics: Toward a new conversation, edited by Edward Freeman and Andrea Larson. New York: Oxford University Press.
64.
Martin, Patricia Yancey. 1992. Gender, interaction, and inequality in organizations. In Gender, interaction, and inequality, edited by Cecelia L. Ridgeway. New York: Springer-Verlag.
65.
Martin, Patricia Yancey. 1996. Gendering and evaluating dynamics: Men, masculinities, and managements. In Men as managers, managers as men: Critical perspectives on men, masculinities, and management, edited by David Collinson and Jeff Hearn. London: Sage.
66.
Martin, Patricia Yancey. 1998. Why can't a man be more like a woman? Reflections on Connell's Masculinities. Gender & Society13:472-474.
67.
Martin, Patricia Yancey. 2001. “Mobilizing masculinities”: Women's experiences of men at work. Organization8 (November): 587-618.
68.
Martin, Patricia Yancey, and David Collinson. 2002. Across the water and over the pond: The developing field of gendered organizations. Gender, Work and Organization9 (June): 244-265.
69.
Martin, Patricia Yancey, John R. Reynolds, and Shelley Keith. 2002. Gender bias and feminist consciousness among judges and lawyers: A standpoint theory analysis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society27 (3): 665-701.
Maume, David J. 1999. Glass ceilings and glass escalators: Occupational segregation and race and sex differences in managerial promotions. Work and Occupations26 (4): 483-509.
72.
Mayhew, Bruce H. 1980. Structuralism versus individualism: Part 1, shadowboxing in the dark. Social Forces59 (2): 335-375.
73.
McGinley, Ann. 2000. Viva la evolucion! Recognizing unconscious motive in Title VII. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy9 (2): 415-492.
74.
McGuire, Gail. 2000. Gender, race, ethnicity and networks: The factors affecting the status of employees' network members. Work and Occupations27 (4): 500-523.
75.
Messerschmidt, James. 2000. Nine lives: Adolescent masculinities, the body, and violence. Boulder, CO: Westview.
76.
Picart, Caroline Joan (Kay) S. Forthcoming. Rhetorically reconfiguring victimhood and agency: The Violence Against Women Act. Rhetoric and Public Affairs6(1).
77.
Pierce, Jennifer. 1995. Gender trials: Emotional lives in contemporary law firms. Berkeley: University of California Press.
78.
Pierce, Jennifer. 2002. “Not qualified?” or “not committed?” A raced and gendered organisational logic in law firms. In An introduction to law and social theory, edited by Reza Bankakar and Max Travers. Oxford, UK: Hart.
79.
Polanyi, Michael. 1966. The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
80.
Pringle, Rosemary. 1989. Secretaries talk: Sexuality, power, and work. Sydney, Australia: Routledge, Chapman and Hall.
81.
Prokos, Anna, and Irene Padavic. 2002. “There oughta be a law against bitches”: Masculinity lessons in police academy training. Gender, Work and Organization9 (4): 439-459.
82.
Pyke, Karen D. 1996. Class-based masculinities: The interdependence of gender, class, and interpersonal power. Gender & Society10:527-549.
83.
Quadagno, Jill, and Catherine Fobes. 1995. The welfare state and the cultural reproduction of gender: Making good girls and boys in the Job Corps. Social Problems42:171-190.
84.
Quinn, Beth A. 2002. Sexual harassment and masculinity: The power and meaning of “girl watching.” Gender & Society16 (3): 386-402.
85.
Rantalaiho, Liisa, Tuula Heiskanen, Paivi Korvajarvi, and Marja Vehvilainen. 1997. Introduction. In Gendered practices in working life, edited by L. Rantalaiho and T. Heiskanen. New York: St. Martin's.
86.
Raymond, J. G. 1979. The transsexual empire: The making of the she-male. Boston: Beacon.
87.
Reskin, Barbara F. 2000. The proximate causes of employment discrimination. Contemporary Sociology29 (2): 319-328.
88.
Reskin, Barbara F. 2002. Motives and mechanisms in explaining ascriptive inequality. Presidential address presented at Annual Meetings, American Sociological Association, Chicago.
89.
Reskin, Barbara F., and Debra Branch McBrier. 2000. Why not ascription? Organizations' employment of male and female managers. American Sociological Review65:210-233.
90.
Ridgeway, Cecelia. 2001. Gender, status and leadership. Journal of Social Issues57 (4): 637-655.
91.
Ridgeway, Cecelia, and Shelley Correll. 2000. Limiting gender inequality through interaction: The (ends) of gender. Contemporary Sociology29 (1): 110-119.
92.
Risman, Barbara. 1998. Gender vertigo. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
93.
Rogers, Mary, and C. D. Garrett. 2002. Who's afraid of women's studies? Lanham, MD: Altamira.
94.
Roper, Michael. 1996. Seduction and succession: Circuits of homosocial desire in management. In Men as managers, managers as men: Critical perspectives on men, masculinities, and managements, edited by D. Collinson and J. Hearn. London: Sage.
95.
Schatzki, Theodore R. 2001. Introduction: Practice theory. In The practice turn in contemporary theory, edited by Theodore Schatzki, Karin Knorr Cetina, and Eike Von Savigny. New York: Routledge.
96.
Schippers, Mimi. 2002. Rockin' out of the box: Gender maneuvering in alternative hard rock. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
97.
Schur, Edwin M. 1983. Labeling women deviant: Gender, stigma, and social control. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
98.
Simmons, Rachel. 2002. Odd girl out: The hidden culture of aggression in girls. New York: Harcourt.
99.
Sinclair, Amanda. 2000. Teaching managers about masculinities: Are you kidding? Management Learning31 (1): 83-101.
100.
Smith, Dorothy E. 1987. The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
101.
Stevenson, Richard W. 2002. The nation: The incredible shrinking government, Bush style. The New York Times, 8 December.
102.
Strati, Antonio. 1999. Organization and aesthetics. London: Sage.
103.
Thorne, Barrie. 1993. Gender play: Girls and boys in school. Rutgers, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
104.
Tsuhima, Teresa, and Peter J. Burke. 1999. Levels, agency, and control in the parent identity. Social Psychology Quarterly62 (2): 173-189.
105.
Weiss, Robert. 1990. Staying the course: The emotional and social lives of men who do well at work. New York: Free Press.
106.
West, Candace, and Don Zimmerman. 1987. Doing gender. Gender & Society1:13-37.
107.
Wharton, Amy, Thomas Rotolo, and Sharon R. Bird. 2000. Social context at work: A multilevel analysis of job satisfaction. Sociological Forum15:65-90.
108.
Whitehead, Stephen. 1998. Disrupted selves: Resistance and identity work in the managerial arena. Gender and Education10:199-215.
