This article examines the complexity of feminized domestic labor in the context of global migration. I view unpaid household labor and paid domestic work not as dichotomous categories but as structural continuities across the public and private spheres. Based on a qualitative study of Filipina migrant domestic workers in Taiwan, I demonstrate how women travel through the maid/madam boundary—housewives in home countries become breadwinners by doing domestic work overseas, and foreign maids turn into foreign brides. While migrant women sell their domestic labor in the market, they remain burdened with gendered responsibilities in their own families. Their simultaneous occupancy of paid and unpaid domestic labor is segmented into distinct spatial settings. I underscore women’s agency by presenting how they articulate their paid and unpaid domestic labor and bargain with the monetary and emotional value of their labor.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alegado, Dean Tiburcio. 1992. The political economy of international labor migration from the Philippines. Ph.D. diss., University of Hawaii, Manoa.
2.
Arcinas, Fe R., Cynthia Banzon-Bautista, and Randolf S. David. 1986. The odyssey of the Filipino migrant workers to the Gulf region. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.
3.
Asian Migrant Centre. 2000. Asian migrant yearbook: Migration facts, analysis and issues in 1999. Hong Kong: Asian Migrant Centre Ltd.
4.
Constable, Nicole. 1999. At home but not at home: Filipina narratives of ambivalent returns. Cultural Anthropology14 (2): 203-28.
5.
Cooke, Fadzilah M. 1986. Australian-Filipino marriages in the 1980s: The myth and the reality. Research paper no. 37. Brisbane, Australia: School of Modern Asian Studies Centre for the Study of Australian-Asian Relations, Griffith University.
6.
Council of Labor Affairs. 2002. Monthly bulletin of labor statistics. March. Taipei, Taiwan: Executive Yuan, Republic of China.
7.
Dumont, Jean-Paul. 2000. Always home, never home: Visayan “helper” and identities. In Home and hegemony: Domestic service and identity politics in South and Southeast Asia, edited by Kathleen M. Adams and Sara Dickey. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
8.
England, Paula, and Nancy Folbre. 1999. The cost of caring. Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science561:39-51.
9.
Enloe, Cynthia. 1989. Bananas, beaches, and bases. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
Eviota, Elizabeth Uy. 1992. The political economy and gender, women and the sexual division of labor in the Philippines. London: Zed Books.
11.
Folbre, Nancy. 1991. The unproductive housewife: Her evolution in the 19th century economic thought. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society16 (3): 463-84.
12.
Go, Stella. 1993. The Filipino family in the eighties. Manila, Philippines: Social Development Research Center, De La Salle University.
13.
Hays, Sharon. 1996. The cultural constructions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14.
Hollnsteiner, Mary R. 1981. The wife and the husband. In Being Filipino, edited by Gilda Fernando Cordero. Manila, Philippines: CCF Books.
15.
Holt, Elizabeth M. 1996. Writing Filipina-Australian bodies: The discourse on Filipina brides. Philippine Sociological Review44:58-78.
16.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, Pierrette. 1994. Gendered transitions: Mexican experiences of migration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, Pierrette, and Ernestine Avila. 1997. “I am here, but I am there”: The meanings of Latina transnational motherhood. Gender & Society11 (5): 548-71.
18.
Illo, Jean Frances. 1995. Redefining the Maybahay or housewife: Reflections on the nature of women’s work in the Philippines. In “Male” and “female” in developing Southeast Asia, edited by Wazir Jahan Kavim. Oxford, UK: Berg.
19.
Kaplan, Elaine. 1987. I don’t do no windows: Competition between the domestic workers and the housewife. In Competition: A feminist taboo? edited by Valerie Miner and Helen E. Longino. New York: Feminist Press.
20.
Katz Rothman, Barbara. 1989. Recreating motherhood: Ideology and technology in a patriarchal society. New York: Norton.
21.
Kibria, Nazli. 1993. Family tightrope: The changing lives of Vietnamese Americans. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
Lan, Pei-Chia. 2000. Global divisions, local identities: Filipina migrant domestic workers and Taiwanese employers. Ph.D. diss., Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
23.
Margold, Jane A. 1995. Narratives of masculinity and transnational migration: Filipino workers in the Middle East. In Bewitching women, pious men: Gender and body politics in Southeast Asia, edited by Aihwa Ong and Michael G. Peletz. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24.
Medina, Belinda. 1991. The Filipino family: A text with selected readings. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.
25.
Nakano Glenn, Evelyn. 1992. From servitude to service work: Historical continuities in the racial division of paid reproductive labor. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society18 (1): 1-43.
26.
———. 1994. Social constructions of mothering: A thematic overview. In Mothering: Ideology, experience, and agency, edited by Evelyn Nakano Glenn, Grace Chang, and Linda Rennie Forcey. New York: Routledge.
27.
National Statistics Office. 2002. Press release of the 2001 survey on overseas Filipinos (SOF). Manila: National Statistics Office, the Philippine Government. Retrieved 24 September 2002 from http://www.census.gov.ph/data/pressrelease.
28.
Nelson, Margaret K. 1990. Negotiated care: The experiences of family day care providers. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
29.
Palma-Beltran, Ruby. 1991. Filipino women domestic helpers overseas: Profile and implications for policy. Asian Migrant4 (2): 46-52.
30.
Palmer, Phyllis. 1989. Domesticity and dirt: Housewives and domestic servants in the United States, 1920-1940s. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
31.
Romero, Mary. 1992. Maid in the U.S.A. New York: Routledge.
32.
Salazar Parreñas, Rhacel. 2000. Migrant Filipina domestic workers and the international division of reproductive labor. Gender & Society14 (4): 560-80.
33.
———. 2001. Servants of globalization: Women, migration and domestic work. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
34.
Siapno, Jacqueline. 1995. Alternative Filipina heroines: Contested tropes in leftist feminisms. In Bewitching women, pious men: Gender and body politics in Southeast Asia, edited by Aihwa Ong and Michael G. Peletz. Berkeley: University of California Press.
35.
Suzuki, Nobue. 2000. Between two shores: Transnational projects and Filipina wives in/from Japan. Women’s Studies International Forum23 (4): 431-44.
36.
Tarcoll, Cecilla. 1996. Migrating “for the sake of the family?” Gender, life course and intra-household relations among Filipino migrants in Rome. Philippine Sociological Review44 (1-4): 12-32.
37.
Tolentino, Roland B. 1996. Bodies, letters, catalogs: Filipinas in transnational space. Social Text14 (3): 49-76.
38.
Tung, Charlene. 1999. The social reproductive labor of Filipina transmigrant workers in Southern California: Caring for those who provide elderly care. Ph.D. diss., University of California, Irvine.
39.
Wang, Hong-Zen, and Shu-ming Chang. Forthcoming. The commodification of international marriages: Cross-border marriage business in Taiwan and Vietnam. International Migration.
40.
Wong, Sau-Ling. 1994. Diverted mothering: Representations of caregivers of color in the age of “multiculturalism.” In Mothering: Ideology, experience, and agency, edited by Evelyn Nakano Glenn, Grace Chang, and Linda Rennie Forcey. New York: Routledge.
41.
Wrigley, Julia. 1995. Other people’s children: An intimate account of the dilemmas facing middle-class parents and the women they hire to raise their children. New York: Basic Books.
42.
Yeoh, Branda S., and Shirlena Huang. 1999. Singapore women and foreign domestic workers: Negotiating domestic work and motherhood. In Gender, migration and domestic service, edited by Janet Henshall Momsen. New York: Routledge.
43.
———. 2000. “Home” and “away”: Foreign domestic workers and negotiations of diasporic identity in Singapore. Women’s Studies International Forum23 (4): 413-29.
