Gender affects us, but we also affect gender. This study reveals some of the ways women in two types of occupations—furniture sales and secretarial—shape the system of gender. As they struggle to define their identities within a segregated occupational structure, these women evoke notions of their differences from men and from other women, as well as their similarities to each group, in ways that are consistent with feminist theoretical positions on these issues. I argue that the ways these women define themselves have consequences for the shape of the system of gender. Many women inadvertently reinforce gender either by upholding traditional gender categories or by devaluing women. Yet some women create a powerful opportunity to dismantle gender by appreciating the work women have done and aligning themselves with these women to break out of staid gender categories.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amott, Teresa L.
, and Julie A. Matthaei. 1996. Race, gender and work: A multicultural economic history of women in the United States. Boston: South End.
2.
Cixous, Hélène
. 1980. Sorties. In New French feminisms, edited by Elaine Marks and Isabelle de Courtivoron. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
3.
Cooper, Anna Julia
. 1892. A voice from the South. Xenia, OH: Aldine.
4.
Cott, Nancy F.1987. The grounding of modern feminism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5.
Daly, Mary
. 1978. Gyn/ecology: The metaethics of radical feminism. Boston: Beacon.
6.
DuBois, W. E. B.[1903] 1989. The souls of Black folk. New York: Penguin.
7.
Eisenstein, Zillah
. 1984. Feminism and sexual equality: Crisis in liberal America. New York: Monthly Review Press.
8.
Farganis, Sondra
. 1994. Situating feminism: From thought to action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Game, Ann
, and Rosemary Pringle. 1984. Gender at work. London: Pluto.
10.
Gaskell, Jane
. 1992. Gender matters from school to work. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
11.
Glaser, Barney G.
, and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
12.
Hartsock, Nancy D. M.1987. The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specific feminist historical materialism. In Feminism and methodology, edited by Sandra Harding. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
13.
Hill Collins, Patricia
. 1991. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
14.
Hill Collins, Patricia
. 1998. Fighting words: Black women and the search for justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
15.
hooks, bell
. 1984. Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston: South End.
16.
Jones, Jacqueline
. 1985. Labor of love, labor of sorrow: Black women, work, and the family from slavery to the present. New York: Basic Books.
17.
Kemp, Alice Abel
. 1994. Women's work: Degraded and devalued. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
Kennelly, Ivy
. 1999. “That single mother element”: How white employers typify Black women. Gender & Society13:168-192.
19.
Kirschenman, Joleen
, and Kathryn Neckerman. 1991. “We'd love to hire them, but...”: The meaning of race to employers. In The urban underclass, edited by Christopher Jencks and Paul Peterson. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
20.
Kraditor, Aileen S.[1965] 1971. The ideas of the woman suffrage movement, 1890-1920. Garden City, NJ: Anchor.
21.
Lorber, Judith
. 1994. Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
Lorber, Judith
. 2000. Using gender to undo gender: A feminist degendering movement. Feminist Theory1 (1): 79-95.
23.
Mansbridge, Jane
. 1999. “You're too independent!” How gender, race, and class make many feminisms. In The cultural territories of race: Black and white boundaries, edited by Michele Lamont. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Mies, Maria
. 1986. Patriarchy and accumulation on a world scale: Women in the international division of labour. London: Zed Books.
25.
Miller, Laura L.1998. Feminism and the exclusion of Army women from combat. Gender Issues16 (3): 33-64.
26.
Minh-ha, Trihn
. 1988. Not you/like you: Post-colonial women and the interlocking questions of identity and difference. Inscriptions3 (4): 71-77.
27.
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade
. 1991. Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Review30:61-88.
28.
Murray, Charles
. 1985. Losing ground: American social policy, 1950-1980. New York: Basic Books.
29.
Namaste, Viviane
. 2000. Invisible lives: The erasure of transsexual and transgendered people. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Omi, Michael
, and Howard Winant. 1994. Racial formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s. New York: Routledge.
31.
Reskin, Barbara F.
, and Patricia A. Roos. 1990. Job queues, gender queues: Explaining women's inroads into male occupations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
32.
Rubin, Herbert J.
, and Irene S. Rubin. 1995. Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
Smith, Dorothy E.1987. The everyday world as problematic. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
34.
Strauss, Anselm
, and Juliet Corbin. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics
. 1982-1998. Employment and earnings. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
36.
Valian, Virginia
. 1998. Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37.
Vogel, Lise
. 1993. Mothers on the job: Maternity policy in the U.S. workplace. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
38.
West, Candace
, and Sarah Fernstermaker. 1995. Doing difference. Gender & Society9:8-37.
39.
West, Candace
, and Don Zimmerman. 1987. Doing gender. Gender & Society1:125-151.
40.
Williams, Christine
. 1989. Gender differences at work: Women and men in nontraditional occupations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
41.
Winant, Howard
. 1995. Symposium on West and Fenstermaker's “Doing difference.”Gender & Society 9:503-506.
