This article uses interview data to examine changes over time in the cultural constructions of executive women's family responsibilities. The author delineates two gendered cultural structures: the family devotion schema and the work devotion schema. Respondents are caught in the conflict between each schema's competing vision of a worthwhile life. Older respondents are more likely to accept the devotion schema's definition of an irreconcilable conflict between work and family, prompting many to avoid marriage or childbearing. In contrast, many members of the youngest cohort, who came of age after the early 1970s women's movement, are refashioning the family devotion schema by subcontracting out domestic responsibilities while maintaining demanding careers. Yet, the family devotion schema continues to haunt all cohorts, enduring in its cognitive, normative, and emotional power. Gender, as expressed in cultural models of family, remains a powerful constraint on the hearts and minds of even professionally successful women.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, Jeffrey C.
1988. Action and its environments. In Action and its environments: Toward a new synthesis, by J. C. Alexander.New York: Columbia University Press.
2.
Barnett, Rosalind C.
, and Caryl Rivers. 1996. She works/he works: How two-income families are happier, healthier, and better off.San Francisco: HarperCollins.
3.
Blair-Loy, Mary. 1997. Career patterns and meaning-making among female executives in finance. Ph.D. diss., University of Chicago, Chicago.
4.
Blair-Loy, Mary.1999. Career patterns of executive women in finance.American Journal of Sociology104:1346-97.
5.
Brines, Julie.1994. Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home.American Journal of Sociology100:652-88.
6.
Coser, Lewis A.
, and Rose Laub Coser. 1974. The housewife and her greedy family. In Greedy institutions, edited by Lewis A. Coser.New York: Free Press.
7.
Cott, Nancy.
1977. The bonds of motherhood: “Woman's sphere” in New England, 1780-1835.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8.
Emirbayer, Mustafa
, and Ann Mische.1998. What is agency?American Journal of Sociology103:962-1023.
9.
Farley, Reynolds.
1996. The new American reality.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
10.
Garey, Anita Ilta.
1999. Weaving work and motherhood.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
11.
Gerson, Kathleen.
1985. Hard choices: How women decide about work, career, and motherhood.Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
Glaser, Barney
, and Anselm Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory.Chicago: Aldine.
13.
Goldscheider, Frances
, and Linda J. Waite. 1991. New families, no families? The transformation of the American home.Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
Hayghe, Howard
, and Suzanne M. Bianchi.1994. Married mothers' work patterns: The job-family compromise.Monthly Labor Review117:24-30.
15.
Hays, Sharon.
1996. The cultural contradictions of motherhood.New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press.
16.
Hochschild, Arlie.
1989. The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home.New York: Viking.
17.
Hughes, Everett C.1945. Dilemmas and contradictions of status.American Journal of Sociology50:353-59.
18.
Ireland, Mardy S.
1993. Reconceiving women: Separating motherhood from female identity.New York: Guilford.
19.
Jacobs, Jerry A.
1989. Revolving doors: Sex segregation and women's careers.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
20.
Kessler-Harris, Alice.
1994. Feminism and affirmative action. In Debating affirmative action: Race, gender, ethnicity and the politics of inclusion, edited by Nicolaus Mills.New York: Delta.
21.
Klein, Ethel.
1984. Gender politics.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
Korn/Ferry International.
1993. Decade of the executive woman.New York: Korn / Ferry International.
23.
Lipsitz Bem, Sandra.1983. Gender schema theory and its implications for child development: Raising gender-aschematic children in a gender-schematic society.Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society8:598-615.
24.
Lipsitz Bem, Sandra.
1993. The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25.
Lorber, Judith.
1994. Paradoxes of gender.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26.
Mannheim, Karl.
1952. The problem of generations. In Essays on the sociology of knowledge, edited by Karl Mannheim.New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
Marx Ferree, Myra
, and Beth B. Hess. 1985. Controversy and coalition: The new feminist perspective.Boston: Twayne.
28.
Nakano Glenn
, Evelyn, Grace Chang, and Linda Rennie Forcey. 1994. Mothering: Ideology, experience and agency.New York: Routledge.
29.
Oppenheim Mason, Karen
, John L. Czajka, and Sara Arber.1976. Change in U.S. women's sex-role attitudes, 1964-1974.American Sociological Review41:573-96.
30.
Oppenheim Mason, Karen
, and Yu-Hsia Lu.1988. Attitudes toward women's familial roles: Changes in the United States, 1977-1985.Gender & Society2:39-57.
31.
Potuchek, Jean L.
1997. Who supports the family? Gender and breadwinning in dual-earner families.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
32.
Ragin, Charles.
1987. The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies.Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
Reskin, Barbara F.
, and Heidi I. Hartmann. 1986. Women's work, men's work: Sex segregation on the job.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
34.
Risman, Barbara J.
1998. Gender vertigo: American families in transition.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35.
Schor, Juliet.
1991. The overworked American: The unexpected decline of leisure.New York: Basic Books.
36.
Sewell, William, E., Jr.1992. A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation.American Journal of Sociology98:1-29.
37.
Shu, Xiaoling
, and Margaret Marini.1998. Gender-related change in the occupational aspirations of youth.Sociology of Education71:44-68.
38.
Skolnick, Arlene.
1991. Embattled paradise: The American family in an age of uncertainty.New York: Basic Books.
39.
Spain, Daphne
, and Suzanne M. Bianchi. 1996. Balancing act: Motherhood and employment among American women.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
40.
U.S. Bureau of the Census.
1992. Marital status and living arrangements: March 1991.Current Population Reports, Series P-20, No. 461. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
41.
U.S. Department of Commerce.
1986. Statistical abstract of the United States 1986.Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
42.
U.S. Department of Commerce.
1988. Statistical abstract of the United States 1988.Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
43.
U.S. Department of Commerce.
1992. Statistical abstract of the United States 1992.Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
44.
Uttal, Lynette.1996. Custodial care, surrogate care and coordinated care: Employed mothers and the meaning of child care.Gender & Society10:291-311.
45.
Wajcman, Judy.
1998. Managing like a man: Women and men in corporate management.Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
46.
Waldfogel, Jane.1997. The effect of children on women's wages.American Sociological Review62:209-17.
47.
West, Candace
, and Don H. Zimmerman.1987. Doing gender.Gender & Society1:125-51.
48.
Whittier, Nancy.
1995. Feminist generations: The persistence of the radical women's movement.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
49.
Whyte, William H., Jr.
1956. The organization man.New York: Simon & Schuster.
