At the end of World War II, Congress terminated the only national day care policy ever enacted to that point in the United States. It was nearly 20 years later, with the 1962 Public Welfare Amendments, that the American state launched the next national experiment in day care. This policy was constructed not in response to the needs of working women but rather to address rising concerns over the Aid to Dependent Children (ADC) program. In this article, the author examines archival data from the U.S. Women's Bureau, the U.S. Children's Bureau, and other agencies to explain the transformation of day care from an employment policy to an adjunct of ADC. She argues that maternalists within the state were able to redefine the content of maternalist ideology to occupy the discursive space produced by the emergent political crisis in the ADC program. This new maternalism provided the grounds for a new national commitment to day care provision but also created the institutional structures of its marginalization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramovitz, Mimi.
1988. Regulating the lives of women: Social welfare policy from colonial times to the present.Boston: South End.
2.
Bell, Winifred.
1965. Aid to dependent children.New York: Columbia University Press.
3.
Bowlby, John.
[1952] 1995. Maternal care and mental health.Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
4.
Brown, Wendy.
1995. States of injury: Power and freedom in late modernity.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
Butler, J. P.
, and J. W. Scott. 1992. Feminists theorize the political.New York: Routledge.
6.
Chafe, William H.
1991. The paradox of change: American women in the 20th century.New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
Congress of Industrial Organizations.
1950. Proceedings of the twelfth constitutional convention.Chicago: Congress of Industrial Organizations.
8.
Fraser, Nancy.
1989. Unruly practices: Power, discourse and gender in contemporary social theory.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9.
Fraser, N.
, and L. Gordon.1994. A genealogy of dependency: Tracing a keyword of the U.S. welfare state.Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society19:309-36.
10.
Gordon, Linda.
1994. Pitied but not entitled: Single mothers and the history of welfare.New York: Free Press.
11.
Gornick, J. C.
, M. C. Meyers, and K. E. Ross.1998. Public policies and the employment of mothers: A cross-national study.Social Science Quarterly79:35-54.
12.
Harrison, Cynthia.
1988. On account of sex.Berkeley: University of California Press.
13.
Heclo, Hugh.
1974. Modern social politics in Britain and Sweden.New Haven, CT: Yale University.
14.
Koven, Seth.
1993. Borderlands: Women, voluntary action, and child welfare in Britain, 1840 to 1914. In Mothers of a new world: Maternalist politics and the origins of welfare states, edited by S. Koven and S. Michel.New York: Routledge.
15.
Koven, Seth
, and Sonya Michel. 1993. Mothers of a new world: Maternalist politics and the origins of welfare states.New York: Routledge.
16.
Ladd-Taylor, Molly.1993. Toward defining maternalism in U.S. history.Journal of Women's History5:110-13.
17.
Ladd-Taylor, Molly.
1994. Mother-work: Women, child welfare, and the state, 1890-1930.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
18.
Michel, Sonya.
1993. The limits of maternalism: Policies toward American wage-earning mothers during the progressive era. In Mothers of a new world: Maternalist politics and the origins of welfare states, edited by S. Koven and S. Michel.New York: Routledge.
19.
Mugge, Robert H.1963. Aid to families with dependent children: Initial findings of the 1961 report on the characteristics of recipients.Social Security BulletinMarch:3-15.
20.
Muncy, Robyn.
1991. Creating a female dominion in American reform, 1890-1935.New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
Quadagno, Jill.
1994. The color of welfare: How racism undermined the war on poverty.New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
Sealander, Judith.
1983. As minority becomes majority.Westport, CT: Greenwood.
23.
Sklar, Kathryn Kish.
1993. The historical foundations of women's power in the creation of the American welfare state, 1830-1930. In Mothers of a new world: Maternalist politics and the origins of welfare states, edited by S. Koven and S. Michel.New York: Routledge.
24.
Skocpol, Theda.
1992. Protecting soldiers and mothers.Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
25.
Soule, Sarah A.
, and Yvonne Zylan.1997. Runaway train? The diffusion of state-level reform in A(F)DC eligibility requirements, 1950-1967.American Journal of Sociology103 (3): 733-62.
26.
U.S. Bureau of the Budget.
1960. Budget of the United States government, fiscal year 1960.Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
27.
U.S. Congress, House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means.
1962. Hearings on the Public Assistance Act of 1962.Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
28.
U.S. Congress, Senate, Committee on Finance.
1962. Hearings on H.R. 10606, 14 May-17 May 1962.Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
29.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.
1998. Trends in the well-being of America's children and youth, 1998.Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
30.
U.S. Social Security Board, Bureau of Public Assistance.1943. Changes in types of families accepted for aid to dependent children.Social Security BulletinJune:30-2.
31.
Zylan, Yvonne.1996. Comment on Fraser and Gordon's “A genealogy of dependency: Tracing a keyword of the U.S. welfare state.”Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society21 (2): 515-30.
