This article is based on interviews with a small number of cohabitants who are critical of conventional marriage. It examines some of the ways in which the distinction between heterosexual cohabitation and marriage is rendered in the New Zealand context. Culturally available distinctions, like that between cohabitation and marriage, are used in the production of resistant counterdiscourses. However, difference can be rewritten as deviance and in this form is central to the exercise of disciplinary power. Contextual shifts in the assertion of a cohabitational self and a marital self contribute to the blurring of the distinction, further exposing the dilemmas of resistance based on difference.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barrett, Michèle.
1991. The politics of truth: From Marx to Foucault.Cambridge, UK: Polity.
2.
Butler, Judith.
1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity.New York: Routledge.
3.
Butler, Judith.
1992. Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of “postmodernism.” In Feminists theorize the political, edited by J. Butler and J. W. Scott.New York: Routledge.
4.
Cain, Maureen.
1993. Foucault, feminist and feeling: What Foucault can and cannot contribute to feminist epistemology. In Up against Foucault: Explorations of some tensions between Foucault and feminism, edited by C. Ramazanoglu.New York: Routledge.
5.
Cooper, Davina.1994. Productive, relational and everywhere? Conceptualising power and resistance within Foucauldian feminism.Sociology28:435-54.
6.
Davies, Bronwyn.1991. The concept of agency: A feminist poststructuralist analysis.Social Analysis30:42-53.
7.
Davies, Bronwyn
, and Rom Harré.1990. Positioning: The discursive production of selves.Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour20:43-64.
8.
de Beauvoir, Simoné.
[1949] 1972. The second sex. Translated by H. M. Parshley. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
9.
de Lauretis, Teresa.
1986. Feminist studies/critical studies.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
10.
Delphy, Christine
, and Diana Leonard. 1992. Familiar exploitation: A new analysis of marriage in contemporary western societies.Cambridge, UK: Polity.
11.
Duncombe, Jean
, and Dennis Marsden.1993. Love and intimacy: The gender division of emotion and “emotion work.” A neglected aspect of sociological discussion of heterosexual relationships.Sociology27:221-41.
12.
Duncombe, Jean
, and Dennis Marsden.1995. “Workaholics” and “whingeing women”: Theorising intimacy and emotion work—The last frontier of gender inequality?Sociological Review43:150-69.
13.
Elizabeth, Vivienne. 1997. Something old. Something borrowed. Something new. Heterosexual cohabitation as marriage resistance? A feminist deconstruction. Ph.D. diss., University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
14.
Firestone, Shulamith.
1972. The dialectic of sex.London: Paladin.
15.
Foucault, Michel.
[1970] 1973. The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences.London: Tavistock.
16.
Foucault, Michel.
1972. The archaeology of knowledge. Translated by A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon.
17.
Foucault, Michel.
[1975] 1979. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Translated by A. M. Sheridan Smith. London: Penguin.
18.
Foucault, Michel.
[1978] 1990. An introduction. Vol. 1 of The history of sexuality. Translated by R. Hurley. New York: Vintage.
19.
Foucault, Michel.
1980. Power/knowledge. Translated by C. Gordon et al. and edited by C. Gordon.New York: Pantheon.
20.
Foucault, Michel.
1982. The subject and power. Translated by L. Sawyer. In Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, edited by H. L. Dreyfuss and P. Rabinow.Brighton, UK: Harvester.
21.
Foucault, Michel.
1991. Politics and the study of discourse. The Foucault effect, edited by G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller.London: Harvester/Wheatsheaf.
22.
Fraser, Nancy.
1989. Unruly practices: Power, discourse and gender in contemporary social theory.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
23.
Fraser, Nancy.1992. The uses and abuses of French discourse theories for feminist politics.Theory, Culture and Society9:51-72.
24.
Gavey, Nicola.1989. Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis: Contributions to feminist psychology.Psychology of Women Quarterly13:459-75.
25.
Gavey, Nicola. 1990. Rape and sexual coercion within heterosexual relationships: An intersection of psychological, feminist and postmodern inquiries. Ph.D. Diss., University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
26.
Hekman, Susan.1991. Reconstituting the subject: Feminism, modernism, and postmodernism.Hypatia6:44-63.
27.
Henriques, Julian
, Wendy Hollway, Cathy Urwin, Couze Venn, and Valerie Walkerdine, eds. 1984. Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity.London: Methuen.
28.
Hochschild, Arlie
, with Anne Machung. 1989. The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home.New York: Viking.
29.
Hollway, Wendy.
1984. Gender difference and the production of subjectivity. In Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity, edited by J. Henriques, W. Hollway, C. Urwin, C. Venn, and V. Walkerdine.London: Methuen.
30.
Hollway, Wendy.
1989. Subjectivity and method in psychology: Gender, meaning and science.London: Sage.
31.
Horowitz, Gad.1987. The Foucaultian impasse: No sex, no self, no revolution.Political Theory15:61-80.
32.
Komter, Aafke.1989. Hidden power in marriage.Gender & Society3:187-216.
33.
Kondo, Dorinne K.
1990. Crafting selves: Power, gender and discourses of identity in a Japanese workplace.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34.
McNay, Lois.
1992. Foucault and feminism: Power, gender and the self.Boston: Northeastern University Press.
35.
Melton, Vivienne S.1992. Co-habitation as marriage resistance? A feminist deconstruction.Sites: A Journal for Radical Perspectives on Culture24:79-98.
36.
Moore, Henrietta L.
1994. A passion for difference: Essays in anthropology and gender.Cambridge, UK: Polity.
37.
Parker, Stephen.
1990. Informal marriage, cohabitation and the law 1750-1989.New York: St Martin's.
38.
Sawicki, Jana.
1989. Identity politics and sexual freedom: Foucault and feminism. In Foucault and Feminism: Reflections on resistance, edited by I. Diamond and L. Quinby.Boston: Northeastern University Press.
39.
Sawicki, Jana.
1991. Disciplining Foucault: Feminism, power and the body.New York: Routledge.
40.
Schwartz, Pepper.
1994. Peer marriage: How love between equals really works.New York: Free Press.
41.
Scott, Joan W.1988. Deconstructing equality-versus-difference: Or, the uses of poststructuralist theory for feminism.Feminist Studies14:33-50.
42.
Smart, Carol.
1984. The ties that bind: Law, marriage and the reproduction of patriarchal relations.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
43.
Spender, Dale.
1994. The ancient history of wifeliness. In Weddings and wives, edited by D. Spender.Ringwood, Australia: Penguin.
44.
Stanley, Scott M.
, and Howard J. Markman.1992. Assessing commitment in personal relationships.Journal of Marriage and the Family54:595-608.
45.
Statistics New Zealand.
1998. The New Zealand official yearbook.Wellington, New Zealand: GP Publications.
46.
Trinh, Minh-ha T.
1989. Woman, native, other: Writing postcoloniality and feminism.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
47.
Trinh, Minh-ha T.
1991. When the moon waxes red: Representation, gender and cultural politics.New York: Routledge.
48.
Valverde, Mariana.1991. As if subjects existed: Analysing social discourses.Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology28:173-87.
49.
VanEvery, Jo.1995a. De/reconstructing gender: Women in antisexist living arrangements.Women's Studies International Forum18:259-69.
50.
VanEvery, Jo.
1995b. Heterosexual women changing the family: Refusing to be a “wife”!London: Taylor and Francis.
51.
Weedon, Chris.
1987. Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory.Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
52.
Weston, Kath.
1991. Families we choose: Lesbians, gays and kinship.New York: Columbia University Press.
53.
Yeatman, Anna.
1990. Bureaucrats, technocrats, femocrats: Essays on the contemporary Australian State.Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
