This article explores Pennsylvania’s enterprise zone program as an economic development strategy in one city—Philadelphia. Given the underlying corporate-centered focus of economic development policies, it focuses on whether such policies can effectively reduce the high rate of joblessness for central-city residents as well as increase the rate of business development for minority business owners. To have a long-term impact on minority communities, economic development policies should identify ways to increase minority economic development through entrepreneurship and job creation strategies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, C. T. , Barelt, D., Elesh, D., Goldstein, I., Kleniewski, N., & Yancey, W. (1991). Philadelphia: Neighborhood, division, and conflict in a postindustrial city. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
2.
Birch, D. L. (1987). Job creation in America: How our smallest companies put the most people to work. New York: Free Press.
3.
Brown, J. (1992, May 31). Urban enterprise zones: Examining the record. Philadelphia Inquirer, pp. C1, C7.
4.
Dabney, D. (1994). Do enterprise zone incentives affect business location decisions?Economic Development Quarterly, 5, 325-334.
5.
Erickson, R. A. , & Friedman, S. W. (1989, April). Enterprise zones: Evaluation of state government policies (Final report for the U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration, reprinted in September). University Park: Center for Regional Business Analysis, College of Business Administration, Pennsylvania State University.
6.
Erickson, R. A. , & Friedman, S. W. (1990). Enterprise zones: Investment and job creation of state government programs in the United States of America. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 8, 251-267.
7.
Gunn, E. M. (1993). The growth of enterprise zones: A policy transformation. Policy Studies Journal, 21, 432-449.
8.
Guskind, R. (1989). Zeal for zones. The National Report, 21, 1358-1362.
9.
Harrison, B. (1994). The myth of small firms as the predominant job generators. Economic Development Quarterly, 8, 3-18.
10.
Kasinitz, P. , & Rosenberg, J. (1993). Why enterprise zones will not work. City Journal, 3, 63.
11.
Lin, J. , & McLarin, K. J. (1992, June 1). City’s enterprise zones: So-so. Philadelphia Inquirer, pp. A1, A8.
12.
Neckerman, K. , & Kirschenman, J. (1991). Hiring strategies, racial bias, and inner-city workers. Social Problems, 38, 433-447.
13.
Pennsylvania Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Community Planning . (1991, October). Philadelphia enterprise zone guidelines (Rev. ed.). Harrisburg, PA: Author.
14.
Riposa, G. (1996). From enterprise zones to empowerment zones: The community context of urban economic development. American Behavioral Scientist, 39, 536-551.
15.
Rubin, B. (1995). Enterprise zones: Cure for urban ills?Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy, 10(4), 101-106.
16.
Vidal, A. C. (1995). Reintegrating disadvantaged communities into the fabric of urban life: The role of community development. Housing and Policy Debate, 6, 169-230.
17.
Watson, S. S. (1995). Using public-private partnerships to develop local economies: An analysis of two Missouri enterprise zones. Policy Studies Journal, 23, 652-668.
18.
White, S. B. , & Osterman, J. D. (1991). Is employment growth really coming from small establishments?Economic Development Quarterly, 5, 241-257.
19.
Wilder, M. G. , & Rubin, B. M. (1996). Rhetoric versus reality: A review of studies on state enterprise zone programs. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62, 473-492.
