The latest report on the impact of business incubators distributed by the National Business Incubation Association (NBIA) suffers from severe shortcomings that undermine claims being made for it. Claims of methodological improvements are spurious, as are those for "added value" of the study results over previous incubator impact studies. It is likely that these claims, however, will be used by NBIA and other promoters of business incubator projects to appeal to sources offending at all levels to support both capital and operating costs of such projects. Even though the latest study focused on a rather select subset of the incubator universe, 40 of the 50 incubators analyzed still have not been able to break even. NBIA still has a way to go before it can provide, or help others to produce, valid performance evaluations, performance benchmarking results, and management information that can help incubators attain financial self-sustainability as well as other performance benchmarks.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bearse, P. J. (1993, December). Comprehensive manual for the evaluation of business incubation projects. Washington, DC: Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce; and Athens, OH: National Business Incubation Association.
2.
Bearse, P. J. (1994). On ethics and values in the field of economic development. Journal of Socio-Economics, 23, 209-235.
3.
Bearse, P. J. , & Tomaru, M. (1994, September). Guidelines on establishment of technology business incubation centres. New York: United Nations Fund for Science and Technology for Development, United Nations Development Programme.
4.
Bearse, P. J. (1995a, October). Strategic paper on business incubation systems. Vienna, Austria: United Nations Industrial Development Organization.
5.
Bearse, P. J. (1995b). Programme review: United Nations Fund for Science and Technology for Development Programme for Technology Business Incubation and Entrepreneurship DevelopmentProceedings of an International Conference on Technology and Business Incubation Centres and Their Role for Innovation, Entrepreneurship and East-West Cooperation, Leipzig, Germany, February 28-March 1. Berlin: ADT (Arbeitsgeme inschaft Deutscher Technologie und Grunderzentren).
6.
Bearse, P. J. (1998, April 24). Monitoring and evaluation system. Warsaw, Poland: The Business Support Project (FIRMA 2000) and the U.S. Agency for International Development.
7.
Dunn, E. (1983). The development of the U.S. urban system. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8.
Gerl, E. (1995). How's your incubator doing? Some tools and tips for evaluating business incubators. In S. Hayhow (Ed.), A comprehensive guide to business incubation. Athens, OH: National Business Incubation Association.
9.
Hatry, H. P. , Fall, M., Singer, T. O., & Liner, E. B. (1990). A manual: Monitoring the outcomes of economic development programs. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
10.
Hayhow, S. (1997). Value of business incubation shines through in new study. NBEA Review, 13(5), 1-2.
11.
Lavelle, J. , & Bearse, P. (1992, April 1). Incubator-as-enterprise. Paper presented at the Senior Policy Seminar on Employment and Training Dimensions of Adjustments in Central and Eastern Europe, Turin Centre, International Labor Office, Turin, Italy.
12.
Lichtenstein, G. (1992). The significance of relationships in entrepreneurship: A case study of the ecology of enterprise in two business incubators. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, PA.
13.
Markley, D. M. , & McNamara, K. T. (1995). Economic and fiscal impacts of abusiness incubator. Economic Development Quarterly, 9(3), 273-278.
14.
Molnar, L. A. , Grimes, D. R., Edelstein, J., De Pietro, R., Sherman, H., Adkins, D., & Tornatzky, L. (1997). Business incubation works: The results of the impact of incubator investments study. Athens, OH: NBIA Publications.
15.
National Business Incubation Association (NBIA) . (1992). The state of the business incubation industry, 1991. Athens, OH: Author.
16.
National Business Incubation Association (NBIA) . (1994a). Kauffman Foundation grant signals new era for incubators and NBIA. NBIA Review, 10(4), 1-2.
17.
National Business Incubator Association (NBIA) . (1994b). Financing new business incubators: Survey results. Athens, OH: Author.
18.
National Business Incubator Association (NBIA) . (1996). 10th anniversary survey of business incubators: 1985-1995. Athens, OH: Author.
19.
Patton, M. Q. (1978). Utilization-focused evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
Reynolds, P. (1996, December 12). Participation in the entrepreneurial process: Estimates for U.S. households (Results of the first pilot study for the Panel Study of U.S. Business Start-Ups, a product of the Entrepreneurial Research Consortium). Wellesley, MA: Babson College, Center for Entrepreneurial Studies.
21.
San Francisco Renaissance Entrepreneurship Center . (1997). San Francisco renaissance ten-year impact study. San Francisco: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
22.
Sherman, H. , & Chappell, D. S. (1998). Methodological challenges in evaluating business incubator outcomes. Economic Development Quarterly, 12(4), 313-321.
23.
Shon, D. (1984). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
24.
Tornatzky, L. G. ,Batts, Y., McCrea, N. E., Shook, M. L., & Quittnan,L.M. (1996). The art and craft of technology business incubation: Best practices, strategies, and tools from 50 programs. Chapel Hill, NC: Southern Technology Council; and Athens, OH: National Business Incubation Association.
25.
Tornatzky, L. G. , & Bearse, P. J. (1995, June 4-7). Identifying best practices of technology business inception. Presentation at the 9th annual conference of the National Business Incubation Association, Scottsdale, AZ.
26.
Udell, G. G. (1990). Are business incubators really creating new jobs by creating new businesses and products?Journal of Production Innovation Management, 7, 108-122.
