Place-based economic policies and value-capture instruments are resurging in many American communities looking for alternative ways to fund infrastructure projects and support local economic revival. Using principal component methods, the authors construct an index for identifying distressed neighborhoods to enable the targeting of place-based policies involving tax increment financing (TIF). In addition, the authors use the Monte Carlo method to simulate the impact of a TIF intervention on employment and property values in neighborhoods. The analysis focuses on Broome County in upstate New York, a region that witnessed massive deindustrialization as manufacturing firms moved to other states and overseas. The authors find that a significant fraction of neighborhoods in the study area would qualify for TIF-type policies that would lead to significant improvements in property values and, likely, modest employment effects.
Funderburg, R. (2019). Regional employment and housing impacts of tax increment financing districts. Regional Studies, 53(6), 874-886. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1490013
2.
Al-FawaeerM.Al-AliA. S.KhaireddinM. (2021). The impact of changing the expected time and variance equations of the project activities on the completion time and cost of the project in PERT model. International Journal of Business and Economics, 20(2), 119-140.
3.
AndersonJ. E. (1990). Tax increment financing: Municipal adoption and growth. National Tax Journal, 43(2), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41788833
4.
BartikT. J. (1990). The market failure approach to regional economic development policy. Economic Development Quarterly, 4(4), 361-370. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124249000400406
5.
Blackmond LarnellT.DowneyD. C. (2019). Tax increment financing in Chicago: The perplexing relationship between blight, race, and property values. Economic Development Quarterly, 33(4), 316-330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242419877944
6.
BlandR. L.OvertonM. (2016). Assessing the contributions of collaborators in public–private partnerships: Evidence from tax increment financing. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(4), 418-435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014559246
ByrneP. (2010). Does tax increment financing deliver on its promise of jobs? The impact of tax increment financing on municipal employment growth. Economic Development Quarterly, 24(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242409350887
9.
ByrneP. F. (2006). Determinants of property value growth for tax increment financing districts. Economic Development Quarterly, 20(4), 317-329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242406291540
10.
CarrollD. A. (2008). Tax increment financing and property value: An examination of business property using panel data. Urban Affairs Review, 43(4), 520-552. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087407308516
ClarkC. E. (1962) Letter to the editor—the PERT model for the distribution of an activity time. Operations Research, 10(3):405-406. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.10.3.405
14.
DunnW. N. (2016). Public policy analysis. (5th Ed.). Routledge, Taylor, & Francis Group.
15.
DyeR. F.MerrimanD. F. (2003). The effect of tax increment financing on land use. In NetzerD (Ed.), The property tax, land use and land use regulation (pp. 49-51). Edward Elgar.
16.
DyeR. F.MerrimanD. F. (2006). Tax increment financing: A tool for local economic development. Journal of Housing and Community Development, 63(3), 22.
17.
El-KhattabiA. R.LesterT. W. (2019). Does tax increment financing pass the “but-for” test in Missouri?Economic Development Quarterly, 33(3), 187-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242419859097
GibsonD. (2003). Neighborhood characteristics and the targeting of tax increment financing in Chicago. Journal of Urban Economics, 54(2), 309-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-1190(03)00061-5
20.
GreenbaumR. T. (2004). Siting it right: Do states target economic distress when designating enterprise zones?Economic Development Quarterly, 18(1), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242403259999
21.
HansonA. (2019). Taxes and economic development: An update on the state of the economics literature. Economic Development Quarterly, 35(3), 232-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912424211022832
22.
HarrisN. C.MetzgerM. W. (2018). St. Louis’s “team TIF”: A community–academic partnership for tax incentive reform. Journal of Urban Affairs, 40(6), 863-886. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2017.1421433
23.
JacksonJ. E. (2003). A user’s guide to principal components. Wiley.
24.
KamletK. S. (2012). Land banking, TIF amendments, and the tax cap: What the Heck do they have in common?New York State Bar Journal, 85(5), 30-32.
25.
KaneK.WeberR. (2016). Municipal investment and property value appreciation in Chicago’s tax increment financing districts. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 36(2), 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X15600034
26.
KovariJ. (2020). Predicting TIF distress: A statistical analysis of tax incremental finance districts in Wisconsin. Public Budgeting & Finance, 40(1), 70-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12248
27.
KrizK. A. (2001). The effect of tax increment finance on local government financial condition. Municipal Finance Journal, 22(1), 41-64.
28.
KrizK. A.JohnsonC. L (2019). A review of state tax increment financing laws. In C. Johnson & K. Kriz (Eds.), Tax increment financing and economic development: uses, structures, and impact (pp. 31–55). State University of New York Press.
29.
LesterT. W. (2014). Does Chicago’s tax increment financing (TIF) programme pass the “but-for” test? Job creation and economic development impacts using time-series data. Urban Studies, 51(4), 655-674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013492228
30.
ManJ. Y. (1999). Fiscal pressure, tax competition and the adoption of tax increment financing. Urban Studies, 36(7), 1151-1167. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098993141
31.
ManJ. Y. (2001). Introduction. In JohnsonC. & ManJ. (Eds.), Tax increment financing and economic development: uses, structures, and impact (pp. 101-112). State University of New York Press.
32.
ManJ. Y.RosentraubM. S. (1998). Tax increment financing: Municipal adoption and effects on property value growth. Public Finance Review, 26(6), 523-547. https://doi.org/10.1177/109114219802600601
33.
New York State. (1984). Municipal development law - tax increment financing. Ny. Const. art. XVI, § 6.
34.
Nguyen-HoangP. (2021). The fiscal effects of tax increment financing on rural school districts: The case of Iowa. AERA Open, 7(1), 2332858421991149. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858421991149
35.
OvertonM.BlandR. L. (2014). The great recession’s impact on credible commitment: An analysis of private investment in tax increment financing districts. State and Local Government Review, 46(4), 282-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X14559713
36.
PaetschJ. R.DahlstromR. K. (1990). Tax increment financing: what it is and how it works. In BinghamR.HillE.WhiteS. (Eds.), Financing economic development: an institutional response (pp. 82-98). Sage Publications.
37.
SmithB. C. (2006). The impact of tax increment finance districts on localized real estate: Evidence from Chicago’s multifamily markets. Journal of Housing Economics, 15(1), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2006.02.003
38.
SmithB. C. (2009). If you promise to build it, will they come? The interaction between local economic development policy and the real estate market: Evidence from tax increment finance districts. Real Estate Economics, 37(2), 209-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6229.2009.00240.x
39.
SrokaR. (2021). Does the arena matter? Comparing redevelopment outcomes in central Dallas tax increment financing districts. Land Use Policy, 105(6), 105431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105431
40.
StewartN. M. (2016). Where the jobs are: evaluating the impact of tax increment financing (TIF) on local employment and private investment in Baltimore city. University of Maryland.
WeberR., BhattaS. D., & MerrimanD. (2003). Does tax increment financing raise urban industrial property values?Urban Studies, 40(10), 2001-2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000116086
43.
Winter, GaryP. (1991). Tax increment financing: A potential redevelopment financing mechanism for New York municipalities. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 18(4) 654-694. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol18/iss4/3
44.
YadavalliA.LandersJ. (2017). Tax increment financing: A propensity score approach. Economic Development Quarterly, 31(4), 312-325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242417733801nn
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
