Can Targeted Government Investment in Rural Establishments Induce Innovative Activity?

Abstract

Rural economic development strategies increasingly focus on “homegrown” economic policies, including investing in entrepreneurial development. However, few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of these strategies, in part because of data constraints. Using a mixed-methods approach, basic t-tests, fixed-effect probit regression, and propensity scoring techniques on data from the Small Business Innovation Research Program and the Rural Establishment Innovation Survey, this article tests the effectiveness of federal policies in inducing innovative activity in rural and urban establishments. The authors also explore indirect comparisons between rural and urban establishments. They find that Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) awards can increase the likelihood that an establishment will act innovatively and that this effect may be larger in rural settings than in urban settings. Results suggest that targeted public investment can induce rural innovation.

Keywords

rural development SBIR economic policy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aghion

Howitt

(1990). A model of growth through creative destruction (No. w3223). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Ahmad

Seymour

R. G.

(2008). Defining entrepreneurial activity: Definitions supporting frameworks for data collection. OECD Statistics Working Paper. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1090372 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1090372

Aryal

Mann

Loveridge

Joshi

(2018). Exploring innovation creation across rural and urban firms: Analysis of the national survey of business competitiveness. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 7(4), 357-376. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEPP-D-18-00026

Aryal

G. R.

Mann

Loveridge

Joshi

(2020). Drivers of differences in inventiveness across urban and rural regions. Journal of Urban Affairs, 43(5), 640–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2020.1712151

Audretsch

(1998). Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14(2), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/14.2.18

Audretsch

D. B.

Feldman

M. P.

(1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86(3), 630-640. www.jstor.org/stable/2118216

Audretsch

D. B.

Link

A. N.

(2018). Innovation capital. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(6), 1760-1767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9700-6

Bradshaw

T. K.

Blakely

E. J.

(1999). What are “third-wave” state economic development efforts? From incentives to industrial policy. Economic Development Quarterly, 13(3), 229-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124249901300303

Brouwer

Budil-Nadvornikova

Kleinknecht

(1999). Are urban agglomerations a better breeding place for product innovation? An analysis of new product announcements. Regional Studies, 33(6), 541-549. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409950078233

10.

Chen

Leung

W. S.

Evans

K. P.

(October, 2016). Are employee-friendly workplaces conducive to innovation? Journal of Corporate Finance, 40, 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.07.011

11.

Drucker

(2014). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge.

12.

Economic Research Service. (2019). Business and industry. Washington, DC. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/rural-economy-population/business-industry/

13.

Feldman

M. P.

Audretsch

D. B.

(1999). Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. European Economic Review, 43(2), 409-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00047-6

14.

Fuglie

K. O.

Toole

A. A.

(2014). The evolving institutional structure of public and private agricultural research. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 96(3), 862-883. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aat107

15.

Glaeser

E. L.

Mare

D. C.

(2001). Cities and skills. Journal of Labor Economics, 19(2), 316-342. https://doi.org/10.1086/319563

16.

Goetz

S. J.

Freshwater

(2001). State-level determinants of entrepreneurship and a preliminary measure of entrepreneurial climate. Economic Development Quarterly, 15(1), 58-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124240101500105

17.

Goetz

S. J.

Partridge

M. D.

Stephens

H. M.

(2018). The economic status of rural america in the president trump era and beyond. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 40(1), 97-118. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppx061

18.

Henderson

(2002). Building the rural economy with high-growth entrepreneurs. Economic Review-Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 87(3), 45-75.

19.

Howell

S. T.

(2017). Financing innovation: Evidence from R&D grants. American Economic Review, 107(4), 1136-1164. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150808

20.

Lanahan

(2016). Multilevel public funding for small business innovation: A review of US state SBIR match programs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(2), 220-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9407-x

21.

Lerner

(1999). The government as venture capitalist: The long-Run impact of the SBIR program. Journal of Private Equity, 3(2), 55-78. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpe.2000.319960

22.

Link

A. N.

Ruhm

C. J.

Siegel

D. S.

(2014). Private equity and the innovation strategies of entrepreneurial firms: Empirical evidence from the small business innovation research program. Managerial and Decision Economics, 35(2), 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2648

23.

Link

A. N.

Scott

J. T.

(2012). Employment growth from public support of innovation in small firms. W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

24.

Link

A. N.

Scott

J. T.

(2018). Propensity to patent and firm size for small R&D-intensive firms. Review of Industrial Organization, 52(4), 561-587.

25.

Lyons

T. S.

Miller

S. R.

Mann

J. T.

(2018). A new role for land grant universities in the rural innovation ecosystem? Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 48(2), 3775.

26.

Malone

Koumpias

A. M.

(2020). Comparing small business owner and voter beliefs regarding constraints on business growth. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 9(3), 329-341. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEPP-03-2020-0012

27.

Malone

Koumpias

A. M.

Bylund

P. L.

(2019). Entrepreneurial response to interstate regulatory competition: Evidence from a behavioral discrete choice experiment. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 55(2), 172-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-019-09375-y

28.

Mann

Loveridge

(2020). Measuring urban and rural establishment innovation in the United States. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2020.1846248

29.

Mann

J. T.

Shideler

(2015). Measuring schumpeterian activity using a composite indicator.”. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 4(1), 57-84. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEPP-07-2013-0029

30.

Markley

D. M.

Low

S. A.

(2012). Wealth, entrepreneurship, and rural livelihoods. Choices (new York, N Y ), 21(1), 1–7.

31.

Moore

(2015). Data report 14-56 national survey of business competitiveness. Social and Economic Sciences Research Center Pullman, Wa: Washington State University.

32.

National Science Foundation. (2016). Research and development: National trends and international comparisons. National Science Board: Science & Engineering Indicators. www.nsf.gov/statistics/2016/nsb2016/#/

33.

Orlando

M. J.

Verba

(2005). Do only big cities innovate? Techological maturity and the location of innovation. Economic Review-Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 90(2), 31.

34.

Potter

(2005). Entrepreneurship policy at local level: Rationale, design and delivery. Local Economy, 20(1), 104-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269094042000326689

35.

Romer

P. M.

(1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002-1037. https://doi.org/10.1086/261420

36.

Romer

P. M.

(1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71-S102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725

37.

SBA. (2019a). “Dashboard” small business administration. Washington, DC. https://www.sbir.gov/awards/annual-reports

38.

SBA. (2019b). “SBIR.gov” small business administration. Washington, DC. https://www.sbir.gov

39.

Schumpeter

J. A.

(1934). Theory of economic development. Routledge.

40.

Shearmur

(2012). Are cities the font of innovation? A critical review of the literature on cities and innovation. Cities (London, England), 29, S9-S18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.06.008

41.

Siegel

D. S.

Wright

(2007). Intellectual property: The assessment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 529-540. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grm033

42.

Stephens

H. M.

Partridge

M. D.

(2011). Do entrepreneurs enhance economic growth in lagging regions? Growth and Change, 42(4), 431-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2011.00563.x

43.

Stephens

H. M.

Partridge

M. D.

Faggian

(2013). Innovation, entrepreneurship and economic growth in lagging regions. Journal of Regional Science, 53(5), 778-812. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12019

44.

Teece

D. J.

(2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003

45.

Toole

A. A.

Turvey

(2009). How does initial public financing influence private incentives for follow-on investment in early-stage technologies? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(1), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9074-7

46.

Wallsten

S. J.

(2000). The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: The case of the small business innovation research program. RAND Journal of Economics, 31(1), 82-100. https://doi.org/10.2307/2601030

47.

Wojan

T. R.

Dotzel

K. R.

Low

S. A.

(2015). Decomposing regional patenting rates: How the composition factor confounds the rate factor. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 535-551. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2015.1095112

48.

Wojan

T. R.

Parker

(2017). Innovation in the rural nonfarm economy: Its effect on job and earnings growth, 2010-2014. USDA-Economic Research Report (Number 238). Washington, DC.