Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Do motion picture incentives nudge productions to film in an adopting state, increase budgets, or hire more cast and filmmakers? Or do they simply subsidize productions that would have occurred regardless? Using California’s Film and Television Tax Credit Program, the author exploits incentives given out by lottery to answer these questions. The author finds that 19% of films would have filmed in California even without a tax incentive, but that the offering of an incentive increased the probability of a film being made in California by 16 percentage points. Both production budgets and the number of cast and filmmakers increased in response to the offering of a tax incentive, and, in California specifically, they increased budget spent by 267% and the number of cast and filmmakers hired by 123%. The program also had differential impacts based on film type, with only nonindependents increasing budgets and the number of cast and filmmakers in California.

Keywords

economic development policy tax incentives state taxation film industry

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abadie

Diamond

Hainmueller

(2010). Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(490), 493-505. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746

Abdulkadiroğlu

Angrist

J. D.

Dynarski

S. M.

Kane

T. J.

Pathak

P. A.

(2011). Accountability and flexibility in public schools: Evidence from Boston’s charters and pilots. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(2), 699-748. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr017

Adkisson

R. V.

(2013). Policy convergence, state film-production incentives, and employment: A brief case study. Journal of Economic Issues, 47(2), 445-454. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624460218

Appelbaum

L. D.

Tilly

Huang

(2010). Economic and production impacts of the 2009 California Film and Television Tax Credit. UCLA Institute for Research on Labor and Employment. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0qh4h6jw

Arauzo-Carod

J. M.

Liviano-Solis

Manjón-Antolín

(2010). Empirical studies in industrial location: An assessment of their methods and results. Journal of Regional Science, 50(3), 685-711. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14679787.2009.00625.x

Bartik

(1991). Who benefits from state and local economic development policy? W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research Press.

Bartik

T. J.

(2018). “But for” percentages for economic development incentives: What percentage estimates are plausible based on the research literature? (Upjohn Institute Working Paper 18-289). W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. https://doi.org/10.17848/wp18-289

Bartik

T. J.

(2019). Making sense of incentives: Taming business incentives to promote prosperity. W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

Bellemare

M. F.

Wichman

C. J.

(2020). Elasticities and the inverse hyperbolic sine transformation. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 82(1), 50-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12325

10.

Burbidge

J. B.

Magee

Robb

A. L.

(1988). Alternative transformations to handle extreme values of the dependent variable. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(401), 123-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478575

11.

Burnett

(2011). State business incentives: Trends and options for the future. The Council of State Governments. http://knowledgecenter.csg.org/kc/system/files/StateBusinessIncentives2011.pdf

12.

Buss

T. F.

(2001). The effect of state tax incentives on economic growth and firm location decisions: An overview of the literature. Economic Development Quarterly, 15(1), 90-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124240101500108

13.

Button

(2018). Can tax incentives create a local film industry? Evidence from Louisiana and New Mexico. Journal of Urban Affairs. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1530570

14.

Button

(2019). Do tax incentives affect business location and economic development? Evidence from state film incentives. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 77(July), 315-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.06.002

15.

Christopherson

(2008). Labor: The effects of media concentration on the film and television workforce. In McDonald

Wasko

(Eds.), The contemporary Hollywood film industry (pp. 155-166). Blackwell.

16.

Christopherson

Rightor

(2010). The creative economy as “big business”: Evaluating State strategies to lure filmmakers. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 29(3), 336-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X09354381

17.

Cooper

Sedgwick

S. M.

Mitra

(2010). California’s Film and Television Tax Credit Program: Assessing its impact. Southern California Association of Governments. https://laedc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/SCAGFilmReport_FINAL.pdf

18.

Ernst & Young. (2009a). Economic and fiscal impacts of the New Mexico tax credit. New Mexico State Film Office.

19.

Ernst & Young. (2009b). Estimated impacts of the New York State film credit. Motion Picture Association of America.

20.

Florida

Mellander

Stolarick

(2011). Geographies of scope: An empirical analysis of entertainment, 1970-2000. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbq056

21.

Hanson

Rohlin

(2013). Do spatially targeted redevelopment programs spillover? Regional Science and Urban Economics, 43(1), 86-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2012.05.002

22.

Hiltzik

(2011, July 20). Upon review, shine comes off glowing report on film tax credit. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/business/la-xpm-2011-jul-20-la-fi-hiltzik-20110720-story.html

23.

Lee

(2008). Geographic redistribution of US manufacturing and the role of state development policy. Journal of Urban Economics, 64(2), 436-450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2008.04.001

24.

Leiser

(2017). The diffusion of state film incentives: A mixed-methods case study. Economic Development Quarterly, 31(3), 255-267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242417710715

25.

Lemisch

(2015). Progress report. California Film Commission.

26.

Lemisch

(2016). Progress report. California Film Commission.

27.

Lemisch

(2017). Program 1.0 CFC Approved Projects List. California Film Commission.

28.

Lester

(2013). Tax credits for foreign location shooting of films: No net benefit for Canada. Canadian Public Policy, 39(3), 451-472. https://doi.org/10.3138/CPP.39.3.451

29.

Mackinnon

J. G.

Magee

(1990). Transforming the dependent variable in regression models. International Economic Review, 31(2), 315-339. https://doi.org/10.2307/2526842

30.

Marshall

(1920). Principles of economics. MacMillan.

31.

McDonald

(2011). Down the rabbit hole: The madness of state film incentives as a solution to runaway production. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law, 14(1), 101-181.

32.

Noll

R. G.

Zimbalist

(1997). Sports, jobs, and taxes. Brookings Institution.

33.

Owens

M. F.

Rennhoff

A. D.

(2018). Motion picture production incentives and filming location decisions: A discrete choice approach. Journal of Economic Geography, 20(3), 679-709. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lby054

34.

Peters

Fisher

(2004). The failures of economic development incentives. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(1), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360408976336

35.

Prillaman

S. A.

Meier

K. J.

(2014). Taxes, incentives, and economic growth: Assessing the impact of pro-business taxes on U.S. state economies. Journal of Politics, 76(2), 364-379. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613001345

36.

Scott

A. J.

(2002). A new map of Hollywood: The production and distribution of American motion pictures. Regional Studies, 36(9), 957-975. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340022000022215

37.

Scott

A. J.

(2004). The other Hollywood: The organizational and geographic bases of television program production. Media, Culture & Society, 26(2), 183-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443704039498

38.

Scott

A. J.

(2005). Hollywood: The place, the industry. Princeton University Press.

39.

Storper

Christopherson

(1987). Flexible specialization and regional industrial agglomerations: The case of the U.S. motion picture industry. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 77(1), 104-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1987.tb00148.x

40.

Strauss-Kahn

Vives

(2009). Why and where do headquarters move? Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(2), 168-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.07.001

41.

Swenson

C. W.

(2017). Preliminary evidence on film production and state incentives. Economic Development Quarterly, 31(1), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242416674807

42.

Tannenwald

(2010). State film subsidies: Not much bang for too many bucks. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. https://arev.assembly.ca.gov/sites/arev.assembly.ca.gov/files/hearings/CBPP_Report.pdf

43.

Taylor

C. D.

(2012). Conservation easement tax credits: A viable policy for stimulating donations? State and Local Government Review, 44(2), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X12445392

44.

Thom

(2018a). Lights, camera, but no action? Tax and economic development lessons from state motion picture incentive programs. American Review of Public Administration, 48(1), 33-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016651958

45.

Thom

(2018b). Time to yell “cut?” An evaluation of the California Film and Production Tax Credit for the motion picture industry. California Journal of Politics and Policy, 10(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.5070/P2cjpp10138993

46.

Thom

(2019). Do state corporate tax incentives create jobs? Quasi-experimental evidence from the entertainment industry. State and Local Government Review, 51(2), 92-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X19877232

47.

Thom

(2017). Fade to black? Exploring policy enactment and termination 12 through the rise and fall of state tax incentives for the motion picture industry. American Politics Research, 45(1), 85-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X16661819

48.

Wasylenko

M. J.

(1997). Taxation and economic development: The state of the economic literature. New England Economic Review, 1997(March), 37-52. https://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=ecn

49.

Weatherford

(2016). California’s first film tax credit program. Legislative Analyst’s Office. https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/3502

50.

Wilson

D. J.

(2009). Beggar thy neighbor? The in-state, out-of-state, and aggregate effects of R &; D tax credits. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(2), 431-36. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.91.2.431

51.

(2008). State R and D tax credits and high technology. Economic Development Quarterly, 22(2), 136-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242408316728

52.

Zhang

Chen

(2018). The effect of investment tax incentives: Evidence from China’s value-added tax reform. International Tax and Public Finance, 25(4), 913-945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-017-9475-y

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.15 MB

Ready for a Close-Up: The Effect of Tax Incentives on Film Production in California

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material