The U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Business-Cooperative Service (RBS) was established with the goal of fostering rural development through grants and low-interest loans. However, rural revitalization is only effective if funds reach their intended recipients. With congressional oversight of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and geographic concentration of RBS benefits, the RBS may deviate from its stated objectives to satisfy congressional preferences. Using RBS grant and loan data from 2006 to 2014, the author performs a test of the congressional dominance model. The empirical results show that congressional membership on the relevant House and Senate subcommittees is associated with greater RBS funding. Congressional influence is a plausible mechanism through which development funding fails to reach those in the areas of greatest need.
BeaulierS. A.HallJ. C.LynchA. K. (2011). The impact of political factors on military base closures. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 14, 333-342.
2.
CowanT. (2016). An overview of USDA rural development programs (CRS Report for Congress No. RL 31837). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
3.
DrabenstottM. (2008). An effective overhaul of federal economic development policy: Response to Markusen and Glasmeier. Economic Development Quarterly, 22, 92-98.
4.
GabeT. M.KraybillD. S. (2002). The effect of state economic development incentives on employment growth of establishments. Journal of Regional Science, 42, 703-730.
5.
GarrettT. A.MarshT. L.MarshallM. I. (2006). Political allocation of US agriculture disaster payments in the 1990s. International Review of Law and Economics, 26, 143-161.
6.
GarrettT. A.SobelR. S. (2003). The political economy of FEMA disaster payments. Economic Inquiry, 41, 496-509.
7.
GoetzS. J.PartridgeM.DellerS. C.FlemingD. A. (2010). Evaluating U.S. rural entrepreneurship policy. Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 40, 20-33.
8.
HallJ.RossA.YenchaC. (2015). The political economy of the Essential Air Service program. Public Choice, 165, 147-164.
9.
HallJ. L. (2010). The distribution of federal economic development grant funds: A consideration of need and the urban/rural divide. Economic Development Quarterly, 24, 311-324.
10.
JohnsonJ. (2009). Rural economic development in the United States: An evaluation of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Business and Industry Guaranteed Loan Program. Economic Development Quarterly, 23, 229-241.
11.
KandilovI. T.RenkowM. (2010). Infrastructure investment and rural economic development: An evaluation of USDA’s Broadband Loan Program. Growth and Change, 41, 165-191.
12.
MarkusenA.GlasmeierA. (2008). Overhauling and revitalizing federal economic development programs. Economic Development Quarterly, 22, 83-91.
RyanM. E. (2014). Allocating infection: The political economy of the Swine Flu (H1N1) vaccine. Economic Inquiry, 52, 138-154.
16.
SobelR. S.CoyneC. J.LeesonP. T. (2007). The political economy of FEMA: Did reorganization matter. Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice, 17(2-3), 49-65.
17.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Business-Cooperative Service. (2014). Statement of Lillian Salerno, Administrator, before the Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Committee on Appropriations, U.S. House of Representatives. Retrieved from https://www.rd.usda.gov/files/testimony/reSalernoLapprops.pdf
18.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Development. (2014). Statement of Doug O’Brien, Deputy Under Secretary for Rural Development, before the Subcommittee on Jobs, Rural Economic Growth and Energy Innovation. Retrieved from https://www.rd.usda.gov/files/testimony/rdOBrienSenAgRegional.pdf
U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Development. (2015b). Statement of Lisa Mensah, Under Secretary for Rural Development, before the Senate Appropriations Committee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration and Related Agencies. Retrieved from https://www.rd.usda.gov/files/RDMensahTestimonyOctober2015.pdf
U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Development. (2016b). Methodology and formulas for allocations of Loan and Grant Program Funds. Retrieved from https://www.rd.usda.gov/files/1940l.pdf
WeingastB. R.MoranM. J. (1983). Bureaucratic discretion or congressional control? Regulatory policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission. Journal of Political Economy, 91, 765-800.
27.
YoungA. T.SobelR. S. (2013). Recovery and Reinvestment Act spending at the state level: Keynesian stimulus or distributive politics?Public Choice, 155, 449-468.
