BussoM.GregoryJ.KlineP. (2013). Assessing the incidence and efficiency of a prominent place-based policy. American Economic Review, 103, 897-947.
2.
HamJ. C.SwensonC.ImrohorogluA.SongH. (2011). Government programs can improve local labor markets: Evidence from state enterprise zones, federal empowerment zones, and federal enterprise community. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 779-797.
3.
HansonA. (2009). Local employment, poverty, and property value effects of geographically-targeted tax incentives: An instrumental variables approach. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39, 721-731.
4.
HansonA.RohlinS. (2011). Do location-based tax incentives attract new business establishments?Journal of Regional Science, 51, 427-449.
5.
HansonA.RohlinS. (2013). Do spatially targeted redevelopment programs spill-over?Regional Science and Urban Economics, 43, 86-100.
6.
KrupkaD. J.NoonanD. S. (2009). Empowerment zones, neighborhood change, and owner occupied housing. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 30, 386-396.
7.
NeumarkD.SimpsonH.2015, ‘Place-based policies’. in: GillesDurantonJVHendersonWilliamStrange (eds) The Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Elsevier/Academic Press:Amsterdam
8.
OakleyD.TsaoH.-S. (2006). A new way of revitalizing distressed urban communities? Assessing the impact of the federal empowerment zone program. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25, 443-471.
