Medical device firms, like firms in the high-technology sector, often include business functions characteristic of both the industrial economy and the knowledge economy. Thus, it is not immediately clear which kinds of locational attributes (i.e., traditional cost-based factors or those concerned with attracting and retaining knowledge workers) are most influential in the site selection process. This study draws on survey data from 48 medical device firms in Massachusetts, a state with one of the largest clusters in the industry, to examine the relative importance of various factors and conditions in the location decision. A second objective is to consider the extent to which the rating of a given location factor varies depending on whether the firm maintains manufacturing facilities in the state. The implications of the findings for both location theory and economic development efforts are discussed.
AllenJ.PotiowskyT. (2008). Portland’s green building cluster: Economic trends and impacts. Economic Development Quarterly, 22, 303-315.
3.
AlmazanA.deMottaA.TitmanS. (2007). Firm location and the creation and utilization of human capital. Review of Economic Studies, 74, 1305-1327.
4.
AppoldS. (1991). The location processes of industrial research laboratories. Annals of Regional Science, 25, 131-144.
5.
ArsenD. (1997). Is there really an infrastructure/economic development link? In BinghamL. R.MierR. (Eds.), Dilemmas of urban economic development (pp. 82-98). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
6.
BarkleyD.McNamaraK. (1994). Manufacturers’ location decisions: Do surveys provide helpful insights?International Regional Science Review, 17, 23-47.
7.
BartikT. (1985). Business location decisions in the United States: Estimates of the effects of unionization, taxes and other characteristics of states. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 3, 14-22.
8.
BerryC.GlaeserE. (2005). The divergence of human capital levels across cities. Papers in Regional Science, 84, 407-444.
9.
BieriD. (2010). Booming Bohemia? Evidence from the U.S. high-technology industry. Industry and Innovation, 17, 23-48.
10.
BlairJ.PremusR. (1987). Major factors in industrial location: A review. Economic Development Quarterly, 1, 72-85.
11.
BrushT.MaritanC.KarnaniA. (1999). The plant location decision in multinational manufacturing firms: An empirical analysis of international business and manufacturing strategy perspectives. Production and Operations Management, 8, 109-132.
12.
BussT. (2001). The effect of tax incentives on economic growth and firm location decisions: An overview of the literature. Economic Development Quarterly, 15, 90-105.
13.
CarlsonV. (2000). Studying firm locations: Survey responses vs. econometric models. Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 30, 1-22.
14.
ChristallerW. (1966). Central places in southern Germany (BaskinC. W., Trans.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. (Original work published 1933)
15.
Clayton-MatthewsA. (2001). The medical device industry in Massachusetts. Lowell: University of Massachusetts Donahue Institute.
16.
Clayton-MatthewsA.LovelandR. (2004). Medical devices: Supporting the Massachusetts economy. Lowell: University of Massachusetts Donahue Institute.
17.
CohenN. (2000). Business location decision-making and the cities: Bringing companies back. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
18.
CortrightJ. (2001). New growth theory, technology and learning: A practitioner’s guide. Review of Economic Literature and Practice: No. 4. Washington, DC: U.S. Economic Development Administration.
19.
DelgadoM.PorterM.SternS. (2010). Clusters and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Geography, 10, 495-518.
20.
DeNobleA.GalbraithC. (1992). Competitive strategy and high technology regional/site location decisions: A cross-country study of Mexican and U.S. electronic component firms. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 3, 19-37.
21.
DeVolR. (1999). America’s high-tech economy: Growth, development, and risks for metropolitan areas. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Institute.
22.
DissartJ.DellerS. (2000). Quality of life in the planning literature. Journal of Planning Literature, 15, 135-161.
23.
DumaisG.EllisonG.GlaeserE. (1997, November). Geographic concentration as a dynamic process (NBER Working Papers 6270). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
24.
FeldmanM. (1999). The new economics of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration: A review of empirical studies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8, 5-25.
25.
FloridaR. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York, NY: Basic Books.
26.
ForkenbrockD.FosterN. (1996). Highways and business location decisions. Economic Development Quarterly, 10, 239-248.
27.
FrickerR.SchonlauM. (2002). Advantages and disadvantages of Internet research surveys: Evidence from the literature. Field Methods, 14, 347-367.
28.
FriedmanJ.GerlowskiD.SilbermanJ. (1992). What attracts foreign multinational corporations? Evidence from branch plant location in the United States. Journal of Regional Science, 32, 403-418.
29.
FultonW.ShigleyP. (2001). Little chips, big dreams. Governing Magazine, May, 20-27.
30.
GalbraithC.DeNobleA. (1988). Location decisions by high technology firms: A comparison of firm size, industry type and institutional form. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13, 31-48.
31.
GalbraithC.RodriguezC.DeNobleA. (2008). SME competitive strategy and location behavior: An exploratory study of high-technology manufacturing. Journal of Small Business Management, 46, 183-202.
GrangerM.BlomquistG. (1999). Evaluating the influence of amenities on the location of manufacturing establishments in urban areas. Urban Studies, 36, 1859-1873.
37.
GreenG. P. (2001). Amenities and community economic development: Strategies for sustainability. Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 31, 61-75.
38.
HaddadM. A.TaylorG.OwusuF. (2010). Locational choices of the ethanol industry in the Midwest corn belt. Economic Development Quarterly, 24, 74-86.
39.
HalsteadJ.DellerS. (1997). Public infrastructure in economic development and growth: Evidence from rural manufacturers. Community Development, 28, 149-169.
40.
HartS.DenisonD.HendersonD. (1989). A contingency approach to firm location: The influence of industrial sector and level of technology. Policy Studies Journal, 17, 599-623.
41.
HaugP. (1991). The location decisions and operations of high technology organizations in Washington state. Regional Studies, 25, 525-541.
42.
HekmanJ. (1992). What are businesses looking for?Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Economic Review, 67, 6-19.
43.
HendersonJ.McNamaraK. (2000). The location of food manufacturing plant investments in corn belt counties. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 25, 680-697.
44.
HotellingH. (1929). Stability and competition. Economic Journal, 39, 41-57.
45.
HoymanM.FaricyC. (2009). It takes a village: A test of the creative class, social capital, and human capital theories. Urban Affairs Review, 44, 311-333.
46.
HuW.CoxL.WrightJ.HarrisT. (2008). Understanding firms’ relocation and expansion decisions using self-reported factor importance rating. Review of Regional Studies, 38, 67-88.
47.
KaplowitzM.HadlockT.LevineR. (2004). A comparison of web and mail survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68, 94-101.
48.
KarakayaF.CanelC. (1998). Underlying dimensions of business location decisions. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 98, 321-329.
49.
KimelbergS. (2010). “Can we seal the deal?”: An examination of uncertainty in the development process. Economic Development Quarterly, 24, 87-96.
50.
KlierT. (2006). Where the headquarters are: Location patterns of large public companies, 1990-2000. Economic Development Quarterly, 20, 117-128.
51.
LöschA. (1954). The economics of location: A pioneer book in the relations between economic goods and geography (WoglomW. H., Trans., with StolperW. F., Trans.; 2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
52.
LoveL.CromptonJ. (1999). Role of quality of life in business (re)location decisions. Journal of Business Research, 44, 211-222.
53.
LoweN. (2007). Job creation and the knowledge economy: Lessons from North Carolina’s life science manufacturing initiative. Economic Development Quarterly, 21, 339-353.
54.
MalangaS. (2004). The curse of the creative class. City Journal, Winter, 36-45.
55.
MaleckiE. J. (1987). The R&D location decision of the firm and “creative” regions–A survey. Technovation, 6, 205-222.
56.
ManningS. (2008). Customizing clusters: On the role of western multinational corporations in the formation of science and engineering clusters in emerging economies. Economic Development Quarterly, 22, 316-323.
57.
MarkusenA. (2006). Urban development and the politics of a creative class: Evidence from a study of artists. Environment and Planning, 38, 1921-1940.
MellanderC. (2009). Creative and knowledge industries: An occupational distribution approach. Economic Development Quarterly, 23, 294-305.
60.
NelsonM. (2005). Rethinking agglomeration economies and the role of the central city: The public accounting industry in Chicago and Minneapolis-St. Paul. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24, 331-341.
61.
NelsonM. (2006). Reinterpreting producer service suburbanization: The public accounting industry in Chicago and Minneapolis-St. Paul. Urban Geography, 27, 45-71.
62.
PammolliF.RiccaboniM.OglialoroC.MagazziniL.BaioG.SalernoN. (2005, July). Medical devices competitiveness and impact on public expenditure. Rome, Italy: Competitiveness, Markets and Regulation. Retrieved from http://www.cermlab.it/_documents/MD_Report.pdf
63.
PorterM. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 15-34.
RastJ.CarlsonV. (2006). When Boeing landed in Chicago: Lessons for regional economic development. State and Local Government Review, 38, 1-11.
66.
SalvesenD.RenskiH. (2003, January). The importance of quality of life in the location decisions of new economy firms. Chapel Hill: Center for Urban and Region Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
67.
SchmennerR. (1982). Making business location decisions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
68.
SchoalesJ. (2006). Alpha clusters: Creative innovation in local economies. Economic Development Quarterly, 20, 162-177.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010a). 2007 County Business Patterns (NAICS) [Table]. Retrieved from http://censtats.census.gov/
71.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010b). Economic Census, Manufacturing: Industry Series: Detailed Statistics by Industry: 1997, 2002, 2007 [Table]. Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov/
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2009). Employment and output by industry 1998, 2008, and projected 2018 [Table]. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_207.htm
74.
U.S. International Trade Commission. (2007, March). Medical devices and equipment: Competitive conditions affecting U.S. trade in Japan and other principal foreign markets (Publication 3909). Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.usitc.gov/publications/docs/pubs/332/pub3909.pdf
75.
WeberA. (1929). Alfred Weber’s theory of the location of industries (FriedrichC. J., Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1909)
76.
WoodwardD. P. (1992). Locational determinants of Japanese manufacturing start-ups in the United States. Southern Economic Journal, 56, 690-708.
77.
ZukinS. (2009). Naked city: The death and life of authentic urban places. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
