This article lays out two broad criteria for crafting a particular brain drain policy at the state level. The first, which we are calling “supply or demand,” asks whether a state experiencing brain drain is below average in high-tech labor demand or above average in high-tech labor supply (the latter concept measured by university enrollments). It is argued that the answer to this question matters a great deal to the policy response. The article then proposes a second, related framework for crafting brain drain policies, which is used widely in the world of business. This is whether a state should “make” or “buy” its own high-tech workers. Benchmarking data and a new review of state policy programs are then used to compare what states are doing with what they ought to be doing in light of their particular situations.
AbramovskyL.SimpsonH. (2009). Geographic proximity and firm-university innovation linkages: Evidence from Great Britain(IFS Working Paper W09/03). Bristol, England: Institute for Fiscal Studies.
2.
AmbroseE. (1998, May18). Plugging the brain drain: Groups form 2-year human capital project to discover why many graduates leave state. The Indianapolis Star, p. C1.
3.
Associated Press State and Local Newswire. (2000, February28). How some states are fighting brain drain. Available from http://lexisnexis.com
4.
Associated Press State and Local Newswire. (2000, April15). States trying to keep students at home once they graduate. Available from http://www.lexisnexis.com
5.
AtkinsonR.GottliebP. (2000). Metro new economy index. Washington, DC: Democratic Leadership Council.
6.
BishopK.ReichsteinT.SalterA. (2008). Exploring the role of geographical proximity in shaping university-industry interaction. In BessantJ.VenablesT. (Eds.), Creating wealth from knowledge: Meeting the innovation challenge (pp. 320-334). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Press.
7.
BonfattiJ. (1999, January7). Local job fair strives to counter brain drain: High tech grads and engineers most in demand. Buffalo News, p. B6.
8.
BoundJ.GroenJ.KedziG.TurnerS. (2004). Trade in university training: Cross-state variation in the production and stock of college-educated labor. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 143-173.
9.
BrinD. (1999, December22). Phila. tech industry aims to draw workers with grants. Dow Jones Newswires. Available from http://interactive.wsj.com
10.
ChappleK. (2004). Gauging metropolitan high-tech and I-tech activity. Economic Development Quarterly, 18, 10-29.
11.
CNN. (2000, February27). Midwest cities, states worry about losing their well-educated. Available from http://www.cnn.com
12.
CullitonJ. W. (1942). Make or buy, a consideration of the problems fundamental to a decision whether to manufacture or buy materials, accessory equipment, fabricating parts, and supplies. Boston, MA: Harvard University, Graduate school of Business Administration, Bureau of Business Research.
13.
CurridE.StolarickK. (2010). The occupation-industry mismatch: New trajectories for regional cluster analysis and economic development. Urban Studies, 47, 337-362.
DeskinsJ.HillB.UllrichL. (2010). Education spending and state economic growth: Are all dollars created equal?Economic Development Quarterly, 24, 45-59.
16.
DynarskiS. (2000). Hope for whom? Financial aid for the middle class and its impact on college attendance. National Tax Journal, 53, 629-661.
17.
DynarskiS. (2004). The new merit aid. In HoxbyC. (Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 63-97). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18.
FloridaR. (1999). The role of the university: Leveraging talent, not technology. Issues in Science and Technology, Summer, 67-73.
19.
FloridaR. (2002a). The economic geography of talent. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92, 743-755.
20.
FloridaR. (2002b). The rise of the creative class. New York, NY: Basic Books.
21.
FloridaR.KnudsenB.StolarickK. (2010). The university and the creative economy. In ArayaD.PetersM. (Eds.), Education in the creative economy: Knowledge and learning in the age of innovation (pp. 45-76). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
22.
FloridaR.MellanderC.StolarickK. (2008). Inside the black box of regional development: Human capital, the creative class and tolerance. Journal of Economic Geography, 8, 615-649.
23.
GottliebP. D. (2001). The problem of brain drain in Ohio and Northeastern Ohio: What is it? How severe is it? What should we do about it?Cleveland, OH: Center for Regional Economic Issues, Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University.
24.
GottliebP. D.FogartyM. (2003). Educational attainment and metropolitan growth. Economic Development Quarterly, 17, 325-336.
25.
GottliebP. D.JosephG. (2006). College-to-work migration of technology graduates and holders of doctorates within the United States. Journal of Regional Science, 46, 627-659.
26.
Greater Boston Chamber and the Boston Foundation. (2003). Preventing a brain drain: Talent retention in greater Boston. Boston, MA: Author.
27.
GroenJ. (2004). The effect of college location on migration of college-educated labor. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 125-142.
28.
GroenJ.WhiteM. (2004). In-State versus out-of-state students: The divergence of interest between public universities and state governments.Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1793-1814.
29.
HigginsC. (1955). Make-or-buy re-examined. Harvard Business Review, 33, 109-119.
30.
HillE.LendelI. (2007). The impact of reputation of bio-life science and engineering doctoral programs on regional economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 21, 223-243.
31.
HoogstraG.FloraxR.Van DijkJ. (2005, August23-25). Do jobs follow people or people follow jobs? A meta-analysis of Carlino-Mills studies. Paper presented at the 45th Congress of the European Regional Science Association. Amsterdam, Netherlands.
32.
HublerM. J. (1970). The make or buy decision. New York, NY: Dickenson.
33.
Indiana Fiscal Policy Institute. (2000). Survey of current practices in postsecondary graduate retention. Indianapolis, IN: Author.
34.
Information Technology and Innovation Foundation and Kauffman Foundation. (2008). The 2008 State New Economy Index. Washington, DC: Authors.
35.
KodrzyckiY. (2001). Migration of recent college graduates: Evidence from the national longitudinal survey of youth. New England Economic Review, January/February, 13-34.
36.
LendelI. (2010). The impact of research universities on regional economies: The concept of university products. Economic Development Quarterly, 24, 210-230.
37.
LevyH.SarnatM. (1976). The make-or-buy decision. Journal of General Management, 4, 46-50.
38.
LindelofP.LofstenH. (2004). Proximity as a resource base for competitive advantage: University-industry links for technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 311-326.
39.
MarkusenA.HallP.GlasmeierA. (1986). High-tech America: The what, how, where, and why of the sunrise industries. Winchester, MA: Allen & Unwin.
40.
MarkusenA.WassallG.DeNataleD.CohenR. (2008). Defining the creative economy: Industry and occupational approaches. Economic Development Quarterly, 22, 24-45.
NagleM. (2007). Canonical analysis of university presence and industrial comparative advantage. Economic Development Quarterly, 21, 325-338.
43.
New Jersey Commission on Higher Education. (1998). The capacity of New Jersey’s higher education system. Trenton, NJ: Author.
44.
New Jersey Higher Education Task Force. (2010). Report of the New Jersey higher education task force. Trenton, NJ: Author.
45.
Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education. (1999). Brain gain 2010: Building Oklahoma through intellectual power. Oklahoma City, OK: Author.
46.
Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education. (2008). Brain gain: The ongoing initiative to build Oklahoma through intellectual power, 2008-2009. Oklahoma City, OK: Author.
47.
PartridgeM.RickmanD. (2003). The waxing and waning of regional economies: The chicken–egg question of jobs versus people. Journal of Urban Economics, 53, 76-97.
48.
RogersK.HellerD. (2003, November). Moving on: State policies to address academic brain drain in the South. Paper presented at the Forum on Public Policy in Higher Education, annual conference of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Portland, OR.
49.
SchmidtP. (1998, February20). More states try to stanch brain drains, but some experts question the strategy. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 44(24), A36-A37.
50.
SelingoJ. (2001, January19). Questioning the merit of merit scholarships. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 47(19), A20.
SmilorR.O’DonnellN.SteinG.WellbornR. (2007). The research university and the development of high-technology centers in the United States. Economic Development Quarterly, 21, 203-222.
53.
SteinnesD. (1982). Do people follow jobs or do jobs follow people? A causality issue in urban economics. Urban Studies, 19, 187-192.
54.
StoupG. (2005). The NJTC state of the New Jersey technology economy report. New Brunswick: New Jersey Technology Council.
55.
ThompsonW.ThompsonP.(1993). Cross-hairs targeting for industries and occupations. In BarkleyD. (Ed.), Economic adaptation: Alternatives for nonmetropolitan areas (pp. 265-286). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
56.
TornatzkyL.GrayD.TarantS.HoweJ. (1998). Where have all the students gone? Interstate migration of recent science and engineering graduates. Raleigh-Durham, NC: Southern Growth Policies Board, Southern Technology Council.
57.
TornatzkyL.GrayD.TarantS.ZimmerC. (2001). Who will stay and who will leave? Individual, institutional, and state-level predictors of state retention of recent science and engineering graduates. Raleigh-Durham, NC: Southern Growth Policies Board, Southern Technology Council.
58.
TornatzkyL.WaugamanP.GrayD. (2002). Innovation U: New university roles in a knowledge economy. Research Triangle Park, NC: Southern Growth Policies Board, Southern Technology Council.
59.
Waldorf (in press). Economic Development Quarterly
60.
WilsonR. (2004, October8). The U. of Louisville’s engineering school, like others, has seen a sharp drop in applications from foreign graduate students.Chronicle of Higher Education, 51, A39.
61.
Wall Street Journal (WSJ), Southeast Journal Edition. (1999). Region’s states and cities gear up high-tech recruiting machine–A Southeast Journal News Roundup. June23, page S1.
62.
Winters (in press). Economic Development Quarterly
