There is increasing evidence that the stock of college-educated labor in an area has fundamental effects on state and local economies through its association with wages, economic growth, personal incomes, and tax revenues. As a result, policy makers in many states attempt to increase the percentage of the state’s population (or workforce) that has a college degree through the use of various higher education policies that have the potential to influence the supply side of the labor market. This article reviews evidence on the effectiveness of these policies in achieving that goal. The author discusses several types of policies related to the finance and production of undergraduate education within a state, including expansions in degree production, merit-based scholarships, location-contingent financial aid, adjustments to the composition of enrollment by residency or by field of study, and internships with state-based employers.
Association of American Medical Colleges. (1998). AAMC data book: Statistical information related to medical education. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Association of American Medical Colleges. (2007). Medical school graduation and attrition rates (Analysis in brief). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
BartikT. J. (1991). Who benefits from state and local economic development policies?Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
4.
BauerP. W.SchweitzerM. E.ShaneS. (2008, November). Knowledge matters: The long-run determinants of state income growth. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Economic Association, Washington, DC.
5.
BesleyT.CaseA. (1995). Incumbent behavior: Vote-seeking, tax-setting, and yardstick competition. American Economic Review, 85,25-45.
6.
BinderM.GandertonP. T. (2002). Incentive effects of New Mexico’s merit-based state scholarship program: Who responds and how? In HellerD. E.MarinP. (Eds.), Who should we help? The negative social consequences of merit scholarships (pp. 41-56). Cambridge, MA: Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
7.
BlanchardO. J.KatzL. F. (1992). Regional evolutions. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1992(1), 1-75.
8.
BoundJ.GroenJ.KezdiG.TurnerS. (2004). Trade in university training: Cross-state variation in the production and stock of college-educated labor. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 143-173.
9.
BoundJ.HolzerH. J. (2000). Demand shifts, population adjustments, and labor market outcomes during the 1980s. Journal of Labor Economics, 18, 20-54.
10.
BrooksR. G.WalshM.MardonR. E.LewisM.ClawsonA. (2002). The role of nature and nurture in the recruitment and retention of primary care physicians in rural areas: A review of the literature. Academic Medicine, 77, 790-798.
11.
CornwellC.MustardD. B.SridharD. J. (2006). The enrollment effects of merit-based financial aid: Evidence from Georgia’s HOPE program. Journal of Labor Economics, 24, 761-786.
12.
DaVanzoJ. S.MorrisonP. A. (1981). Return and other sequences of migration in the United States. Demography, 18, 85-101.
13.
DeitzR. (2007). A brain drain or an insufficient brain gain? In Upstate New York at-a-glance. Buffalo, NY: Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
14.
DesJardinsS. L. (1999). Simulating the enrollment effects of changes in the tuition reciprocity agreement between Minnesota and Wisconsin. Research in Higher Education, 40, 705-716.
15.
DewanS. (2009, June11). Despite odds, cities race to bet on biotech. New York Times, p. A1.
16.
DoughertyC. (2007, December26). Ex-residents are gone, but they’re not forgotten. Wall Street Journal, p. B1.
17.
DoyleW. R. (2006). Adoption of merit-based student grant programs: An event history analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28, 259-285.
18.
DoyleW. R. (2008). Access, choice, and excellence: The competing goals of state student financial aid programs. In BaumS.McPhersonM.SteeleP. (Eds.), The effectiveness of student aid policies: What the research tells us (pp. 159-188). New York, NY: College Board.
19.
DurbinD. (2000, April16). State struggles with loss of grads. Ann Arbor News, p. D5.
20.
DynarskiS. (2000). Hope for whom? Financial aid for the middle class and its impact on college attendance. National Tax Journal, 53, 629-661.
21.
DynarskiS. (2004). The new merit aid. In HoxbyC. M. (Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 63-97). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
DynarskiS. (2008). Building the stock of college-educated labor. Journal of Human Resources, 43, 576-610.
23.
DynarskiS.Scott-ClaytonJ. E. (2008). Complexity and targeting in federal student aid: A quantitative analysis. In PoterbaJ. M. (Ed.), Tax policy and the economy (Vol. 22, pp. 109-150). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Education Commission of the States. (2001). Merit scholarships (ECS State Notes). Denver, CO: Author.
25.
FieldE. (2009). Educational debt burden and career choice: Evidence from a financial aid experiment at NYU Law School. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1, 1-21.
26.
GlaeserE. L.ScheinkmanJ. A.ShleiferA. (1995). Economic growth in a cross-section of cities. Journal of Monetary Economics, 36, 117-143.
27.
GoldinC.KatzL. F. (1999). The shaping of higher education: The formative years in the United States, 1890 to 1940. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(1), 37-62.
28.
Governor of New York. (2009, May14). Governor Paterson issues executive order creating task force to diversify the New York state economy through industry–higher education partnerships (Press release on Executive Order 19). Albany: State of New York.
29.
GroenJ. A. (2004). The effect of college location on migration of college-educated labor. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 125-142.
30.
GroenJ. A.WhiteM. J. (2004). In-state versus out-of-state students: The divergence of interest between public universities and state governments. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1793-1814.
31.
HansenW. L. (1983). Impact of student financial aid on access. In FroomkinJ. (Ed.), The crisis in higher education (pp. 84-96). New York, NY: Academy of Political Science.
32.
HansonG. H.SlaughterM. J. (2002). Labor-market adjustment in open economies: Evidence from US states. Journal of International Economics, 57, 3-29.
33.
HenryG. T.RubensteinR. (2002). Paying for grades: Impact of merit-based financial aid on educational quality. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21, 93-109.
34.
HickmanD. C. (2009). The effects of higher education policy on the location decision of individuals: Evidence from Florida’s Bright Futures Scholarship Program. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39, 553-562.
35.
HillE. W.LendelI. (2007). The impact of the reputation of bio-life science and engineering doctoral programs on regional economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 21, 223-243.
36.
HoxbyC. M. (1997). How the changing market structure of U.S. higher education explains college tuition (NBER Working Paper No. 6323). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
37.
Indiana Fiscal Policy Institute. (2000). Survey of current practices in postsecondary graduate retention. Indianapolis, IN: Author.
38.
Iowa: Governor wants graduates to stay home. (2001, October11). New York Times, p. A20.
39.
IranzoS.PeriG. (2009). Schooling externalities, technology, and productivity: Theory and evidence from U.S. states. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91, 420-431.
40.
JaffeA. B.TrajtenbergM.HendersonR. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 577-598.
41.
JaschikS. (2007, July3). Holding on to graduates. Inside Higher Ed.
42.
JustmanM.ThisseJ. (1997). Implications of the mobility of skilled labor for local public funding of higher education. Economics Letters, 55, 409-412.
43.
KaneT. J. (1995). Rising public college tuition and college entry: How well do public subsidies promote access to college? (NBER Working Paper No. 5164). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
44.
KatzL. F.MurphyK. M. (1992). Changes in relative wages, 1963-1987: Supply and demand factors. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 35-78.
45.
LedeburL. C.WoodwardD. (1990). Adding a stick to the carrot: Location incentives with clawbacks, recisions, and recalibrations. Economic Development Quarterly, 4, 221-237.
46.
LongL. E. (1988). Migration and residential mobility in the United States. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
47.
MarmarosD.SacerdoteB. (2002). Peer and social networks in job search. European Economic Review, 46, 870-879.
48.
McLendonM. K.HellerD. E.YoungS. P. (2005). State postsecondary policy innovation: Politics, competition, and the interstate migration of policy ideas. Journal of Higher Education, 76, 363-400.
49.
MorettiE. (2004). Estimating the social return to higher education: Evidence from longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional data. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 175-212.
50.
MullanF. (1999). The muscular Samaritan: The National Health Service Corps in the new century. Health Affairs, 18(2), 168-175.
51.
National Association of State Student Grant and Aid Programs. (1991). 22nd annual survey report on state-sponsored student financial aid (1990-1991 academic year). Albany, NY: Author.
52.
National Association of State Student Grant and Aid Programs. (2008). 39th annual survey report on state-sponsored student financial aid (2007-2008 academic year). Albany, NY: Author.
53.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Descriptive summary of 1995-96 beginning postsecondary students: Six years later (NCES 2003-151). Washington, DC: Author.
54.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2004). The condition of education 2004 (NCES 2004-077). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
55.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2008). Digest of education statistics 2007 (NCES 2008-022). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
56.
National Governors Association. (1998). State scholarship programs to assist and retain postsecondary students. Washington, DC: Author.
57.
National Governors Association. (2000). Using research and development to grow state economies. Washington, DC: Author.
58.
PallaisA. (2009). Taking a chance on college: Is the Tennessee Education Lottery Scholarship program a winner?Journal of Human Resources, 44, 199-222.
59.
PathmanD. E.KonradT. R.RickettsT. C. (1992). The comparative retention of National Health Service Corps and other rural physicians: Results of a 9-year follow-up study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 268, 1552-1558.
60.
PathmanD. E.TaylorD. H.Jr.KonradT. R.KingT. S.HarrisT.Henderson. . . KochG. G. (2000). State scholarship, loan forgiveness, and related programs: The unheralded safety net. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284, 2084-2092.
61.
PerryK. K. (2001). Where college students live after they graduate (ERIC ED453739). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
62.
PetersA. H. (1993). Clawbacks and the administration of economic development policy in the Midwest. Economic Development Quarterly, 7, 328-340.
63.
ReddenE. (2007, January4). Tethering students to their states. Inside Higher Ed.
64.
RizzoM. J.EhrenbergR. G. (2004). Resident and nonresident tuition and enrollment at flagship state universities. In HoxbyC. M. (Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 303-349). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
65.
SaxenianA. (1996). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66.
SchmidtP. (1998, February20). More states try to stanch “brain drains,” but some experts question the strategy. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A6.
67.
Scott-ClaytonJ. (2009). On money and motivation: A quasi-experimental analysis of financial incentives for college achievement (Unpublished manuscript). Columbia University, New York, NY.
68.
SeftorN. S.TurnerS. E. (2002). Back to school: Federal student aid policy and adult college enrollment. Journal of Human Resources, 37, 336-352.
69.
TornatzkyL. G.GrayD. O.TarantS. A.ZimmerC. (2001). Who will stay and who will leave? Individual, institutional and state-level predictors of state retention of recent science and engineering graduates. Research Triangle Park, NC: Southern Technology Council.
70.
TrostelP. A. (2010). The fiscal impacts of college attainment. Research in Higher Education, 51, 220-247.
71.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2006). A half-century of learning: Historical statistics on educational attainment in the United States, 1940 to 2000 (Census 2000 Report PHC-T-41). Washington, DC: Author.
72.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1995). National Health Service Corps: Opportunities to stretch scarce dollars and improve provider placement (GAO/HEHS-96-28). Washington, DC: Author.
73.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (2000). Health care access: Programs for underserved populations could be improved (GAO/T-HEHS-00-81). Washington, DC: Author.
74.
WirtzR. A. (2003, January). Plugging the brain drain. Fedgazette, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
75.
WozniakA. (2010). Are college graduates more responsive to distant labor market opportunities?Journal of Human Resources, 45, 944-970.
76.
ZhangL. (2007). Nonresident enrollment demand in public higher education: An analysis at national, state, and institutional levels. Review of Higher Education, 31, 1-25.
77.
ZhangL.NessE. C. (2010). Does merit-based aid stem brain drain?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 143-165.
