Incubation Push or Business Pull? Investigating the Geography of U.S. Business Incubators

Abstract

The primary purposes of this article are to present new data on the geographic distribution of U.S. business incubators and to explore the geographically bounded factors that influence the location of business incubators. The authors’ data show that U.S. business incubators are unevenly distributed across urban/rural divisions, states, and counties. Factor analysis identifies three common factors from 28 demographic, social, and economic variables drawn from publicly available data at the county level. These factors include agglomeration, welfare, and business/entrepreneurship. The results of binomial logistic regressions suggest that incubators are more likely to be found in counties with high levels of agglomeration but low levels of existing business development. Our findings suggest support for the incubation push hypothesis over the business pull hypothesis on the location of business incubators based on the regional configuration of incubator presence.

Keywords

business incubators geography push-pull effects entrepreneurship

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acs, Z.J. , & Armington , C. (2006). Entrepreneurship, geography, and American economic growth. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Acs, Z.J. , Audretsch, D.B. , Braunerhjelm, P. , & Carlsson, B. ( 2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship . Small Business Economics, 32, 15-30.

Audretsch, D.B. ( 1995). Innovation and industry evolution. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Aernoudt, R. ( 2004). Incubators: Tool for entrepreneurship? Small Business Economics, 23, 127-135.

Audretsch, D.B. , Dohse, D. , & Niebuhr, A. ( 2010). Cultural diversity and entrepreneurship: A regional analysis for Germany. Annals of Regional Science, 45, 55-85.

Bartik, T.J. ( 1989). Small business start-ups in the United States: Estimates of the effects of characteristics of states. Southern Economic Journal, 55, 1004-1018.

Bearse, P. ( 1998). A question of evaluation: NBIA’s impact assessment of business incubators. Economic Development Quarterly , 12, 322-333.

Feldman, M.P. ( 2001). The entrepreneurial event revisited: Firm formation in a regional context. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 861-891.

Headd, B. ( 2000). Business success: Factors leading to surviving and closing successfully (U.S. Small Business Administration Discussion Paper). Retrieved from http://www.ces.census.gov/index.php/ces/cespapers?down_key=101614

10.

Knopp, L. ( 2007). State of the business incubation industry. Athens, OH: National Business Incubation .

11.

Lee, S.Y. , Florida, R. , & Acs, Z.J. ( 2004). Creativity and entrepreneurship: A regional analysis of new firm formation. Regional Studies, 38, 879-891.

12.

Markley, D.M. , & McNamara, K.T. (1995). Economic and fiscal impacts of a business incubator. Economic Development Quarterly, 9, 273-278.

13.

Mian, S.A. ( 1996). Assessing value-added contributions of university technology business incubators to tenant firms. Research Policy , 25, 325-335.

14.

Ottaviano, I.P. , & Peri, G. ( 2006). The economic value of cultural diversity: Evidence from US cities. Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 9-44.

15.

Reynolds, P.D. , Storey, D.J. , & Westhead, P. ( 1994). Cross national comparisons of the variation in new firm formation rates. Regional Studies, 28, 443-456.

16.

Rothaermel, F.T. , & Thursby, M. ( 2005). Incubator firm failure or graduation? The role of university linkages. Research Policy, 34, 1076-1090.

17.

University of Michigan, National Business Incubation Association, Ohio University, & Southern Technology Council. (1997 ). Business incubation works: The results of the impact of incubator investments study. Athens, OH: NBIA.

18.

Wiggins, J. , & Gibson, D.V. ( 2003). Overview of US incubators and the case of the Austin Technology Incubator. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 3, 56-66.