This article describes a comprehensive study of regionalism conducted by a joint team of economists and economic development specialists for the U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA). The project consisted of two main activities: an examination of the factors associated with economic development success and the creation of a practical interactive tool for EDA project assessment and comparison. Findings from surveys, interviews, and project case studies are discussed in terms of their support for a positive relationship between successful economic development efforts and factors such as leadership and private investment. The authors also discuss the creation of a quantitative assessment model using well-known approaches such as economic impact multipliers and cluster theory. The primary contribution of this work to the existing body of EDAfocused research and evaluation literature is its introduction of a means of using standardized scores, also known as z-scores, to compare and assess economic development projects across both industries and regions.
Arena, P., Adams, J.A., Noyes, K., Rhody, S., & Noonan, M. ( 2008). Construction grants program impact assessment report : Volume 1 report on investigation and results (Grant Thornton research report with ASR Analytics). Retrieved from http://www.eda.gov/PDF/EDAConsImpactStudyVolume1FINAL.pdf
2.
Banas, P.A., Mayer, S.E., Schumacher, A.W., & Snyder, M.B. ( 1966). A study of local leadership in community economic planning (HSR-RR-66/12-Ab). McLean, VA: Human Sciences Research.
3.
Barrows, R.L., & Bromley, D.W. ( 1975). Employment impacts of the Economic Development Administration’s public works programs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics , 75, 46-54.
4.
Bartik, T.J. ( 1991). Who benefits from state and local economic development policies?Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
5.
Burchell, R.W., Pignataro, L.J., Griffis, F.H., Epling, J., Haughwout, A.F., Varady, D., Looye, J., et al. (1997). Public works program: Performance evaluation (NTIS No. PB97- 175434/A15). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
6.
Burchell, R.W., Robison, M.H., & Haughwout, A.F. (1998). Public works program: Multiplier and employment-generating effects (NTIS No. PB98-145295/A15). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
7.
Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2007). REIS 1969-2005 [Electronic database on CD-ROM].
8.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2006). Local area unemployment statistics [Database text file]. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/time.series/la/
9.
Drabenstott, M. ( 2008). An effective overhaul of federal economic development policy: Response to Markusen and Glasmeier. Economic Development Quarterly, 22, 92-98.
10.
Economic Development Administration. (2001 ). Economic studies of the Economic Development Administration: An annotated bibliography 1995-2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration, Research and Technical Assistance.
11.
Economic Development Administration. (2004 ). Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, as amended, including the comprehensive amendments made by the Economic Development Administration Reauthorization Act of 2004 (U.S. Government Publication No. 108-373,118Stat1756). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved from www.eda.gov/InvestmentsGrants/Lawsreg.xml
12.
Economic Development Administration. (2007 ). Standard terms and conditions for construction projects. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved from www.eda.gov/InvestmentsGrants/Directives.xml
13.
Economic Development Administration. (2009 a). All about EDA: Funding priorities. Retrieved from http://www.eda.gov/AboutEDA/AbtEDA.xml
14.
Economic Development Administration. (2009 b). Research reports. Retrieved from http://www.eda.gov/Research/ResearchReports.xml
15.
EDA National Performance Team and Rutgers. ( 1999). EDA GPRA pilot I-Construction projects. Final report prepared for U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration (EDA Project No. 99-06-07442).
16.
Fasenfest, D., & Reese, L.A. ( 1997). What works best? Values and the evaluation of local economic development policy. Economic Development Quarterly, 11, 195-207.
17.
Finkle, J.A. ( 2008). A cautious look into reconfiguring federal economic development programs. Economic Development Quarterly, 22, 112-114.
18.
Haughwout, A.F. ( 1999). New estimates of the impact of EDA public works program investments on county labor markets. Economic Development Quarterly, 13, 371-382.
19.
Hodgson, S., Thomas, L., Fattore, E., Lind, P.M., Alfven, T., Hellstrom, L., et al. (2008). Bone mineral density changes in relation to environmental PCB exposure. Environmental Health Perspectives , 116, 1162-1166.
20.
Johnson, K.P., & Kort, J.R. ( 2004). 2004 redefinition of the BEA economic areas. Survey of Current Business, 84, 68-75.
21.
Kwass, P., Siegel, B., Reamer, A., & Roberts, B. ( 1992). Evaluation of the U.S. Economic Development Administration’s public works program: Analysis and findings (EDA Project No. 99-10-13740). Sommerville, MA: Mt. Auburn.
22.
Lake, R.W., Leichenko, R., & Glasmeier, A.K. (2004). EDA and U.S. economic distress: 1965-2000 (EDA Project No. 99-07-13812). Retrieved from http://www.eda.gov/ImageCache/EDAPublic/documents/pdfdocs/2004julyedaandu_2es_2eeconomicdistressreport_2epdf/v1/2004julyedaandu.s.economicdistressreport.pdf
23.
Markusen, A., & Glasmeier, A. ( 2008). Overhauling and revitalizing federal economic development programs. Economic Development Quarterly, 22, 83-91.
24.
Martin, R.C., & Graham, R.E. ( 1980). The impact of Economic Development Administration programs: Some empirical evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics , 62, 52-62.
25.
Pablo, A.L., Sitkin, S.B., & Jemison, D.B. ( 1996). Acquisition decision-making process: The central role of risk. Journal of Management, 22, 723-746.
26.
Partridge, M.D., Rickman, D.S., & Li, H. ( 2009). Who wins from local economic development? A supply decomposition of U.S. county employment growth. Economic Development Quarterly , 23, 13-27.
27.
Porter, M.E. ( 1998). The competitive advantage of nations: With a new introduction . New York, NY: Free Press.
28.
Regional Dynamics. (2007). REDYN model multipliers [Electronic database files].
29.
Ritsema van Eck, J., & Koomen, E. ( 2008). Characterising urban concentrations and land-use diversity in simulations of future land use. Annals of Regional Science , 42, 123-140.
30.
Rossberg, J.I., Melle, I., Opjordsmoen, S., & Friis, S. ( 2008). The relationship between staff members’ working conditions and patients’ perceptions of the treatment environment. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 54, 437-446.
31.
Singerman, P. ( 2008). Repurposed federal economic development programs: A practitioner’s persepective. Economic Development Quarterly, 22, 99-106.
32.
Stevens, B., & Lahr, M.L. ( 1988). Regional economic multipliers: Definition, measurement, and application. Economic Development Quarterly, 2, 88-96.
33.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1996). Economic development: Limited information exists on the impact of assistance provided by three agencies (Government report GAO/RECD-96-103). Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
34.
Willson, R.W., & Brown, K.D. ( 2008). Carbon neutrality at the local level. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74, 497-504.
