Tax increment financing (TIF) has been a popular and controversial economic development tool for several decades. This research considers the determinants of competitive dynamics, equity, and path dependency on TIF use. The authors use logistic and ordinary least squares regressions on the approval, number, and value of TIFs in Missouri to flesh out the competitive dynamics, effects on intermunicipal inequality, and path dependency of TIF use. They find that there are competitive dynamics that affect TIF use: Being adjacent to another city that uses TIF increases the likelihood that a city will approve a TIF. The study finds evidence that TIF adoption patterns contribute to intermunicipal inequality, and it provides some support for the importance of path dependency in TIF use.
Albornoz, F., & Corcos, G. ( 2007). Regional integration, subsidy competition, and the relocation choices of MNCs. Berkeley Electronic Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 7, 1-27. Retrieved June 15, 2007, from http://www.bepress.com/bejeap/v017/iss1/art1
2.
Anderson, J.E. ( 1990). Tax increment financing: Municipal adoption and growth . National Tax Journal, 43, 155-163.
3.
Anderson, J.E., & Wassmer, R.W. ( 1995). The decision to "bid for business": Municipal behavior in granting property tax abatements. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 25, 739-757.
4.
Aydin, U. ( 2007). From competition to cooperation: Subsidies in the United States, Canada, and the European Union. (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Washington, 2007). Dissertation Abstracts International, AAT 0819325.
5.
Barros, P.P., & Cabral, L. ( 2000). Competing for foreign direct investment. Review of International Economics, 8, 360-371.
6.
Bartik, T. ( 1991). Who benefits from state and local economic development policy?Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research Press.
7.
Byrne, P.F. ( 2005). Strategic interaction and the adoption of tax increment financing. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35, 279-303.
8.
Dye, R.F., & Merriman, D.F. (2000). The effects of tax increment financing on economic development. Journal of Urban Economics , 47, 306-328.
9.
Geolytics, Inc. (2000). Census CD and maps [GIS data]. East Brunswick, NJ: Author.
10.
Gordon, C. ( 2008). Mapping decline: St. Louis and the fate of the American city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
11.
Greenbaum, R.T., & Bondonio, D. ( 2004). Losing focus? A comparative evaluation of spatially targeted revitalization programs in the US and the EU. Regional Studies , 38, 319-334.
12.
Guisinger, S.E. ( 1985). A comparative study of country policies. In S. E. Guisinger & Associates (Eds.), Investment incentives and performance requirements (pp. 1-55). New York: Praeger.
13.
Harding, T., & Javorcik, B.S. (2007). Developing economies and international investors: Do investment promotion agencies bring them together? Unpublished manuscript, World Bank.
International City/County Management Association. ( 2006). The municipal year book 2006. Washington, DC: International City/ County Management Association .
16.
Li, Q. ( 2006). Democracy, autocracy, and tax incentives to foreign direct investors: A cross- national analysis. Journal of Politics , 68, 62-74.
17.
Man, J.Y. ( 1999). Fiscal pressure, tax competition and the adoption of tax increment financing. Urban Studies, 36, 1151-1167.
18.
Man, J.Y. ( 2001). Introduction. In C. J. Johnson & J. Y. Man (Eds.), Tax increment financing and economic development (pp. 1-11). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
19.
Missouri Department of Economic Development. ( 2004). Annual report on local TIF. Jefferson City, MO: Department of Economic Development.
20.
Missouri Department of Economic Development. ( 2005). Annual report on local TIF. Jefferson City, MO: Department of Economic Development.
21.
Peters, A., & Fisher, P. ( 2004). The failures of economic development incentives. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70, 27-37.
22.
Reese, L.A. ( 2001). Yes, but . . . : Questioning the conventional wisdom about economic development. Economic Development Quarterly , 15, 299-312.
23.
Reese, L.A. ( 2006). Not just another determinants piece: Path dependency and local tax abatements. Review of Policy Research, 23, 491-504.
24.
Schwartz, D., Pelzman, J., & Keren, M. ( 2008). The ineffectiveness of location incentive programs. Economic Development Quarterly, 22, 167-179.
25.
State Auditor of Missouri. (1986). Review of 1985 property tax rates. Jefferson City, MO: Office of the State Auditor of Missouri.
26.
State Auditor of Missouri. (2005). Review of 2005 property tax rates. Jefferson City, MO: Office of the State Auditor of Missouri.
27.
Thomas, K.P. ( 2000). Competing for capital: Europe and North America in a global era. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
28.
U. S. Census Bureau. (2008). American FactFinder 2000. Retrieved February 10, 2008, from http://www.census.gov
29.
Wishlade, F. ( 2008). All’s well that ends well? Recent developments in EU competition policy and regional aid control (European policy research papers, European Policies Research Centre). Glasgow, UK: University of Strathclyde.
