Benchmarking exercises have become increasingly popular within the sphere of regional policy making. However, most exercises are restricted to comparing regions within a particular continental bloc or nation.This article introduces the World Knowledge Competitiveness Index (WKCI), which is one of the very few benchmarking exercises established to compare regions across continents.The article discusses the formulation of the WKCI and analyzes the results of the most recent editions.The results suggest that there are significant variations in the knowledge-based regional economic development models at work across the globe. Further analysis also indicates that Silicon Valley, as the highest ranked WKCI region, holds a unique economic position among the globe’s leading regions. However, significant changes in the sources of regional competitiveness are evolving as a result of the emergence of new regional hot spots in Asia. It is concluded that benchmarking is imperative to the learning process of regional policy making.
Acs, Z.J., Anselin, L., & Varga, A. ( 2002). Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy, 31, 1069-1085.
2.
Adams, J.D. ( 1990). Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth . Journal of Political Economy, 98, 673-702.
3.
Asheim, B. ( 1996). Industrial districts as "learning regions": A condition for prosperity. European Planning Studies, 4, 379-400.
4.
Asheim, B. ( 1997). Towards a learning based strategy for regional development: Structural limits or new possibilities?Paper presented at the Regional Studies Conference on "Regional Frontiers,"Frankfurt, Germany.
5.
Asheim, B. ( 2002). Temporary organisations and spatial embedded-ness of learning and knowledge creation. Geographiska Annaler B: Human Geography, 84, 111-124.
6.
Atkinson, R.D., & Correa, D.K. ( 2007). The 2007 state new economy index: Benchmarking economic transformation in the states. Kansas City, KS: Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.
7.
Atkinson, R.D., & Gottlieb, P.D. (2001). The metropolitan new economy index: Benchmarking economic transformation in the nation’s metropolitan areas. Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute.
8.
Beacon Hill Institute. (2006a). State competitiveness report 2006 . Boston: Suffolk University.
9.
Beacon Hill Institute. (2006b). Metro area competitiveness report 2006. Boston: Suffolk University .
10.
Beck, N. ( 1992). Shifting gears: Thriving in the new economy. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Harper Collins.
11.
Begg, I. (1999). Cities and competitiveness. Urban Studies, 36, 795-810. Boschma, R. (2004). Competitiveness of regions from an evolutionary perspective. Regional Studies, 38, 1001-1014.
12.
Bradley, S., & Taylor, J. ( 1996). Human capital formation and local economic performance . Regional Studies, 30, 1-14.
13.
Bristow, G. ( 2005). Everyone’s a "winner": Problematising the discourse of regional competitiveness. Journal of Economic Geography , 5, 285-304.
14.
Castellacci, F., & Archibugi, D. ( 2008). The technology clubs: The distribution of knowledge across nations. Research Policy, 37, 1659-1673.
15.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., & Rhodes, E. ( 1978). Measuring efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
16.
Chesbrough, H. ( 2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
17.
Cook, W.D., & Kress, M. ( 1990). A data envelopment model for aggregating preference rankings . Management Science, 36, 1302-1310.
18.
Cooke, P. ( 2002). Knowledge economies. London: Routledge.
19.
Cooke, P. ( 2007). Regional innovation systems, asymmetric knowledge and the legacies of learning. In R. Rutten & F. Boekema. (Eds.), The learning region: Foundations, state of the art, future (pp. 184-205). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
20.
Crouch, C., Finegold, D., & Sako, M. ( 1999). Are skills the answer? The political economy of skill creation in advanced industrial countries. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21.
De Vol, R.C. ( 1999). America’s high-tech economy: Growth, development, and risks for metropolitan areas. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Institute.
22.
De Vol, R., Bedroussian, A., & Soojung, K. ( 2007). Best performing cities 2007: Where America’s jobs are created and sustained. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Institute
23.
De Vol, R., Koepp, R., & Ki, J. ( 2004). State technology and science index: Enduring lessons for the intangible economy. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Institute.
24.
Erickcek, G.A., & Watts, B.R. ( 2003). An economic development benchmarking system for rural Michigan. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
25.
Fagerberg, J. ( 1996). Technology and competitiveness. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 12(3), 39-51.
26.
Florida, R. ( 2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
27.
Fox, R.K., & Treuhaft, S. ( 2006). Shared prosperity, stronger regions: An agenda for rebuilding America’s older core cities. Oakland, CA: Policy Link.
28.
Freeman, C. ( 1987). Technology, policy, and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
29.
Furman, J.L., Porter, M.E., & Stern, S. ( 2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31, 899-933.
30.
Griliches, Z. ( 1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661-1707.
31.
Hall, P., & Preston, P. ( 1988). The carrier wave: New information technology and the geography of innovation 1846-2003. London: Unwin Hyman.
32.
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C.K. (1994). Competing for the future . Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
33.
Harris, R.G. ( 2001). The knowledge-based economy: Intellectual origins and new economic perspectives. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 21-40.
34.
Hatzichronoglou, T. ( 1997). Revision of the high-technology sector and product classification (STI Working Papers, OCDE/ GD(97)216). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
35.
Hollanders, H. ( 2007). 2006 European regional innovation scoreboard. Brussels, BelgiumEuropean Commission, DG Enterprise.
36.
Howells, J. ( 2005). Innovation and regional economic development: A matter of perspective? Research Policy, 34, 1220-1234.
37.
Huggins, R. ( 2003). Creating a UK competitiveness index: Regional and local benchmarking. Regional Studies, 37, 89-96.
38.
Huggins, R. ( 2008). The evolution of knowledge clusters: Progress and policy . Economic Development Quarterly, 22, 277-289.
39.
Huggins, R. ( 2009). Regional competitive intelligence: Benchmarking and policy-making . Regional Studies. Retrieved September 1, 2009, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343400802331312
40.
Huggins, R., Bussell, S., Liu, J., Sootarsing, K., Day, J., Izushi, H., et al. (2004). World Knowledge Competitiveness Index 2004: Benchmarking the globe’s leading knowledge economy regions. Cardiff, UK: Robert Huggins.
41.
Huggins, R., & Davies, W. ( 2006). European Competitiveness Index 2006-07. Pontypridd, UK: Robert Huggins.
42.
Huggins, R., & Izushi, H. ( 2002). World Knowledge Competitiveness Index 2002: Benchmarking the globe’s high-performing regions. Cardiff, UK: Robert Huggins.
43.
Huggins, R., & Izushi, H. ( 2007). Competing for knowledge: Creating, connecting, and growing . London: Routledge.
44.
Huggins, R., & Izushi, H. ( 2008). UK Competitiveness Index 2008. Cardiff , UK: Centre for International Competitiveness.
45.
Huggins, R., Izushi, H., & Davies, W. ( 2005). World Knowledge Competitiveness Index 2005. Pontypridd, UK: Robert Huggins.
46.
Huggins, R., Izushi, H., Davies, W., & Shougui, L. ( 2008). World Knowledge Competitiveness Index 2008. Cardiff, UK: Centre for International Competitiveness .
47.
Huggins, R., Izushi, H., Day, J., Emlyn-Jones, N., Liu, J., & Sootarsing, K. (2003). World Knowledge Competitiveness Index 2003-2004: Benchmarking the globe’s leading knowledge economy regions. Cardiff, UK: Robert Huggins .
48.
Institute for Management Development. (2009 ). The world competitiveness yearbook. Lausanne , Switzerland: Institute for Management Development .
49.
Jaffe, A.B. ( 1989). Real effect of academic research. American Economic Review, 79, 957-970.
50.
Kline, S.J., & Rosenberg, N. ( 1986). An overview of innovation. In R. Landau & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), The positive sum strategy: Harnessing technology for economic growth (pp. 275-305). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
51.
Kondratieff, N.D. ( 1926). Die langen Wellen der konjunktur. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft, 56, 573-609.
52.
Kondratieff, N.D. ( 1935). The long waves in economic life. Review of Economic Statistics, 17(6), 105-115.
53.
Krugman, P. ( 1994). Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession. Foreign Affairs, 73, 28-44.
54.
Krugman, P. ( 2003). Growth on the periphery: Second wind for industrial regions?Glasgow, UK: Fraser Allander Institute .
55.
Laafia, I. ( 1999). Regional employment in high technology. In Statistics in Focus: Research and Development Theme, 9(1). Luxembourg: Eurostat.
56.
Lee, F.C., & Has, H. ( 1996). A quantitative assessment of high-knowledge industries versus low-knowledge industries. In P. Howitt (Ed.), The implications of knowledge-based growth for micro-economic policies (pp. 39-78). Calgary, Alberta, Canada: University of Calgary Press.
57.
Lopez-Claros, A., Porter, M., Sala-i-Martin, X., & Schwab, K. ( 2006). Global competitiveness report 2006-2007. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
58.
Lundvall, B.-A. ( 1988). Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg , & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 349-369). London: Pinter.
59.
Lundvall, B.-A. (Ed.) (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.
60.
Luque-Martínez, T., & Munõz-Leiva, F. (2005). City benchmarking: A methodological proposal referring specifically to Granada. Cities, 22, 411-423.
61.
Malecki, E.J. ( 2004). Jockeying for position: What it means and why it matters to regional development policy when places compete. Regional Studies, 38, 1101-1120.
62.
Malecki, E.J. ( 2007). Cities and regions competing in the global economy: Knowledge and local development policies. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25, 638-654.
63.
Morgan, K. ( 1997). The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies, 31, 491-503.
64.
Moulaert, F., & Sekia, F. ( 2003). Territorial innovation models: A critical survey. Regional Studies, 37, 289-302.
65.
Murphy, C. ( 2005). Competitive intelligence: Gathering, analysing and putting it to work. Aldershot, UK: Gower .
66.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. ( 1994). Jobs study: Evidence and explanations. Labour market trends and underlying forces of change. Paris: Author.
67.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. ( 1999). OECD science, technology and industry scoreboard: Benchmarking knowledge-based economies. Paris: Author.
68.
Parkinson, M., Hutchins, M., Simmie, J., Clark, G., & Verdonk, H. ( 2004). Competitive European cities: Where do the core cities stand?London: Report to the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
69.
Pavitt, K. ( 1982). R&D, patenting and innovative activities: A statistical exploration. Research Policy, 11, 33-51.
70.
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
71.
Porter, M.E. ( 1998). On competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
72.
Porter, M.E., & Stern, S. ( 1999). The new challenge to America’s prosperity: Findings from the Innovation Index. Washington, DC: Council on Competitiveness.
73.
Prahalad, C.K., & Hamel, G. ( 1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
74.
Raab, R.A., & Kotamraju, P. ( 2006). The efficiency of the high-tech economy: Conventional development indexes versus a performance index. Journal of Regional Science, 46, 545-562.
75.
Romer, P.M. ( 1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002-1037.
76.
Romer, P.M. ( 1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71-S102.
77.
Rose, R. ( 1993). Lesson-drawing in public policy. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
78.
Rothwell, R. ( 1994). Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. International Marketing Review, 11, 7-31.
79.
Rutten, R., & Boekema, F. (Eds.). (2007). The learning region: Foundations, state of the art, future. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
80.
Sabel, C. ( 1996). Learning-by-monitoring: The dilemmas of regional economic policy in Europe. In Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (Ed.), Networks of enterprises and local development: Competing and co-operating in local productive systems . Paris: OECD.
81.
Schumpeter, J.A. ( 1939). Business cycles. New York: McGraw-Hill.
82.
Thompson, R.G., Singleton, F.D., Jr. , Thrall, R.M., & Smith, B.A. (1986). Comparative site evaluations for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas. Interfaces , 16(6), 35-49.
83.
Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. ( 2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34, 1203-1219.
84.
Underwood, J. ( 2002). Competitive intelligence. Oxford, UK: Capstone.
85.
Wink, R. ( 2007). Transregional institutional learning in Europe: prerequisites, actors and limitations. Unpublished manuscript, Hochschule für Technik, Wirtschaft und Kultur (HTWK), Leipzig .
86.
Wong, C. ( 2002). Developing indicators to inform local economic development in England. Urban Studies, 39, 1833-1863.
87.
World Economic Forum. (2006). Global competitiveness report, 2006-2007. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
