Air pollution emitted from firms and industries in the United States poses a significant threat to human health and the environment. Economists have traditionally opposed environmental regulations based on the argument that regulations reduce economic growth. Some scholars, however, have argued that polluting firms often adjust to environmental regulations through technological innovations that have the opposite effect. This study examines the effects of environmental regulations on economic growth through a case study of the metal finishing industry in the South Coast Basin of Southern California. The industry in the Basin has been regulated since 1988 by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) as a result of the industry’s use of hexavalent chromium. Based on a comparative analysis of the metal finishing industries in Chicago and Detroit, it appears that the AQMD regulations have not had a detrimental impact on the growth of the industry in the Basin.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. ( 2001, February). Chromium (CAS #7440-47-3). Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services .
2.
American Lung Association. (2008). Los Angeles remains most polluted U.S. city. Retrieved June 29, 2008, from http://www.citymayors.com/enviornment/polluted_uscities.html
3.
Baral, A., Engelken, R., & Steward, P. ( 2006). Chromium-based regulations applicable to metal finishing industries in the United States: A policy assessment. Review of Policy Research, 23, 1-21.
4.
Barbera, A., & McConnell, V. ( 1986). Effects of pollution control on industry productivity: A factor demand approach. Journal of Industrial Economics , 35, 161-172.
5.
Berman, E., & Bui, L. ( 2001). Environmental regulation and productivity: Evidence from oil refineries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, 498-510.
6.
Bezdek, R. ( 1993). Environment and economy: What’s the bottom line ? Environment, 35(7), 7-32.
7.
Caglieri, A., Goldoni, M., Acampa, O., Andreoli, R., Vettori, M., Corradi, M., et al. (2006, April). The effect of inhaled chromium on different exhaled breath condensate biomarkers among chrome-plating workers . Environmental Health Perspectives, 114, 542-546.
8.
California Air Resources Board. (1985). Initial statement of reasons for proposed rulemaking: Identification of hexavalent chromium as a toxic air contaminant. Sacramento, CA: Author.
9.
California Air Resources Board. (1988). Proposed airborne toxic control measure for emissions of hexavalent chromium from chrome plating and chromic acid anodizing operations. Sacramento, CA: Author.
10.
California Air Resources Board. (1998). Proposed amendments to the hexavalent chromium control measure for decorative and hard chrome plating and chromic acid anodizing facilities. Sacramento, CA: Author.
11.
California Air Resources Board. (2003). Hexavalent chromium at John Swett. Retrieved July 10, 2008 , from http://www.arb.ca.gov/ch/aq_result/crockett/cr_cr6.htm
12.
California Air Resources Board. (2006, August). Proposed amendments to the hexavalent chromium airborne toxic control measure for chrome plating and chromic acid anodizing operations. Sacramento, CA: California Environmental Protection Agency, Stationary Source Division.
13.
California Environmental Protection Agency. ( 2002, June). Chemicals known to the state of California to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity. Sacramento, CA : Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment .
14.
Chalmer, P. ( 2008). The future of finishing. Ann Arbor, MI: National Metal Finishing Resource Center .
15.
Frazer, L. ( 2006). Shiny science: A new substitute for hexavalent chromium . Environmental Health Perspectives, 114, A482-A485.
16.
Gibb, H., Lees, P., Pinsky, P., & Rooney, B. ( 2000). Lung cancer among workers in chromium chemical production . American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 38, 115-126.
17.
Gollop, F., & Roberts, J. ( 1983). Environmental regulations and productivity growth: The case of fossil-fueled electric power generation. Journal of Political Economy, 91, 654-674.
18.
Gray, W.B., & Shadbegian, R.J. (1995). Pollution abatement costs, regulation, and plant-level productivity (Working Paper No. 4994). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
19.
Hand, K. ( 2007, December). The 2007 large plating job shop survey . Products Finishing, 72(3), 16-20.
20.
Haveman, M. ( 1998). Profile of the metal finishing industry. Minneapolis, MN: Waste Reduction Institute for Training and Applications Research.
21.
Jaffe, A., Newell, R., & Stavins, R. ( 2002). Environmental policy and technological change . Environmental and Resource Economics, 22, 41-69.
22.
Jaffe, A., & Palmer, K. ( 1997). Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79, 610-619.
23.
Jaffe, A., Peterson, S., Portney, P., & Stavins, R. ( 1995). Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing: What does the evidence tell us? Journal of Economic Literature, 33, 132-163.
24.
Jorgenson, P., & Wilcoxen, P. ( 1990). Environmental regulation and U.S. economic growth . RAND Journal of Economics, 21, 314-340.
25.
Jorgenson, P., & Wilcoxen, P. ( 1992). Impact of environmental legislation on U.S. economic growth, investment, and capital costs. In D. Brodsky (Ed.), U.S. environmental policy and economic growth: How do we fare? (pp. 1-39). Washington, DC: American Council for Capital Formation.
26.
Kirchner, M. ( 2006). Captive operation or outsource? That is the question . Products Finishing, 71(3), 56.
27.
Magat, W. ( 1979). The effects of environmental regulation on innovation . Law and Contemporary Problems, 43, 3-25.
28.
Meyer, S. ( 1992). Environmentalism and economic prosperity: Testing the environmental impact hypothesis. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Project on Environmental Politics and Policy.
29.
Meyer, S. ( 1993, March). Environmental protection and economic development in New England (Working Paper No. 3). Cambridge : Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Project on Environmental Politics and Policy.
30.
Milliman, S., & Prince, R. ( 1989). Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 17, 247-265.
31.
Morgenstern, R., Pizer, W., & Shih, J. ( 2000). Jobs versus the environment: An industry-level perspective (Discussion Paper No. 99-01). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future .
32.
Murchison, G., Popejoy, C., Vincent, R., & Cameron, F. ( 1988). Proposed airborne toxic control measure for emissions of hexavalent chromium from chrome plating and chromic acid anodizing operations . Sacramento: California Air Resources Board.
33.
National Academy of Sciences Committee on the Science of Climate Change. (2001). Climate change science: An analysis of some key questions. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
34.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. ( 2008). OSHA fact sheet. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved July 10, 2008, from http://www.osha.gov
35.
Palmer, K., Oates, W., & Portney, P. ( 1995). Tightening environmental standards: The benefit-cost or no-cost paradigm? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 119-132.
36.
Pearce, L. ( 2005). SIC 3471 electroplating, plating, polishing, anodizing, and coloring. Encyclopedia of American Industries, 1, 830-833.
37.
Pellerin, C., & Booker, S. ( 2000). Reflections on hexavalent chromium: Health hazards of an industrial heavyweight. Environmental Perspectives , 108, A402-A407.
38.
Porter, M. ( 1991, April). America’s green strategy. Scientific American, 264(4), 96.
39.
Porter, M., & Esty, D. ( 2005). National environmental performance: An empirical analysis of policy results and determinants. Environment and Development Economics, 10, 391-434.
40.
Porter, M., & Van Der Linde, E. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 97-118.
41.
Reeve, D. ( 2007). Environmental improvements in the metal finishing industry in Autralasia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 756-763.
42.
Ritz, B., Wilhelm, M., & Zhao, Y. ( 2006). Air pollution and infant death in Southern California, 1989-2000. Pediatrics, 118, 493-502.
43.
Roediger-Schluga, T. ( 2004). The Porter hypothesis and the economic consequences of environmental regulation: A neo-Schumpeterian approach. NorthHampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Schmalensee, R. ( 1994). The costs of environmental protection. In M. Kotowski (Ed.), Balancing economic growth and environmental goals (pp. 55-75). Washington, DC : Center for Policy Research.
46.
Selmi, D. ( 2005). The promise and limits of negotiated rulemaking: Evaluating the negotiation of a regional air quality rule (Legal Studies Paper No. 2005-9) . Los Angeles: Loyola Law School .
47.
South Coast Air Quality Management District ( 2000a). An air toxics control plan for the next ten years. Pomona, CA: Author.
48.
South Coast Air Quality Management District (2000b). Multiple air toxics exposure study (Mates-II): Final report. Pomona, CA: Author .
49.
South Coast Air Quality Management District ( 2002December). , Board meeting minutes. Pomona, CA: Author.
50.
South Coast Air Quality Management District ( 2003, April). Final staff report: Proposed amended rule 1469-hexavalent chromium emissions from chrome plating and chromic acid anodizing operations . Pomona, CA: Author.
51.
South Coast Air Quality Management District ( 2008a). Draft staff report: Proposed amended rule 1469-hexavalent chromium emissions from chromium electroplating and chromic acid anodizing operations. Pomona, CA: Author.
52.
South Coast Air Quality Management District ( 2008b). Multiple air toxics exposure study (Mates-III): Final report. Pomona, CA: Author .
53.
South Coast Air Quality Management District. ( 2008c). The health effect of air pollution. Retrieved May 2, 2008, from www.aqmd.gov
54.
Steward, R. ( 1981). Regulation, innovation, and administrative law: A conceptual framework. California Law Review, 69, 1256-1270.
55.
Thomas, W., & Ong, P. ( 2004). Environmental regulations and industrial competitiveness: An analysis of air pollution control regulations on the wood furniture industry in Southern California. Economic Development Quarterly, 18, 220-235.
56.
Tucker, R. ( 2006). Coatings suppliers, chemical makers see China as the next "gold rush": A burgeoning Chinese economy, rising material demands lure investment from international metal finishing industries. Metal Finishing, 104(11), 14-17.
57.
U.S. Department of Commerce. (2006). County business patterns. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
58.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. ( 2001, February). Chromium (CAS #7440-47-3). Washington, DC: Public Health Service Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
59.
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1995 a). New regulation controlling air emission from chromium electroplating and anodizing tanks (EPA-453/F-95-001). Washington, DC : Government Printing Office.
60.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1995 b, September). Profile of the fabricated metal products industry (EPA/310-R-95-007). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
61.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2007 , October). National water quality inventory: Report to Congress, 2002 reporting cycle (EPA 841-R-07-001). Washington, DC : Government Printing Office.
62.
Wilson, J. ( 2008, January 5). Cancer risk from toxic air declines: AQMD report shows a 17% drop since 1999, but pollution in the region is still dangerously high. Los Angeles Times, p. A1.
