Targeting public redevelopment funding toward the most marketable brownfields is viewed as an economically efficient use of scarce resources because it may guarantee the greatest likelihood of success. But to what extent does this policy result in spatial and social inequities by neglecting contaminated sites in distressed neighborhoods containing minority and low-income populations? This case study of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, identified that tracts with above-average percentages of African Americans and Hispanics, although containing above-average numbers of brownfields per square mile and higher percentages of brownfields compared to percentage of the city's area, had below-average city-assisted redevelopments as a percentage of all brownfields. A policy implication is that despite difficulties promoting brownfield redevelopment in distressed neighborhoods, in addition to economic efficiencies, more emphasis is needed on the social benefits of public assistance for brownfield redevelopment, including potential spillover benefits, such as crime reduction and health improvements for surrounding neighborhoods.
Armstrong, C., & Verma, N. (2005, July). The social construction of brownfields. Paper presented at the Association of European Schools of Planning conference, Vienna, Austria.
2.
Arvai, J., & Gregory, R. (2003). Testing alternative decision approaches for identifying cleanup priorities at contaminated sites. Environmental Science & Technology, 37, 1469-1476.
3.
Bartsch, C., Ward, M., Brown, K., Dickson, D., Thorsen, B., Ewen, A., & Fox, P. (2004). Unlocking brownfields: Keys to community revitalization . Washington, DC: National Association of Local Government Environmental Professionals.
4.
Bullard, R., & Johnson, G. (2000). Environmental justice: Grassroots activism and its impacts on public policy decision making. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 555-578.
5.
City of Milwaukee. (2005). Master property record. Retrieved September, 2005, from http://www.milwaukee.gov/DownloadTabularData3496.htm
6.
Civil Rights Act of 1964, Pub. L. No. 88-352, 78 Stat.241, U. S. Code Vol. 42, §2000d-2000d-7.
7.
Council for Urban Economic Development. (1999 ). Brownfields redevelopment: Performance evaluation. Washington, DC: Author.
8.
Deason, J., Sherk, G., & Carroll, G. (2001). Public policies and private decisions affecting the redevelopment of brownfields. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
9.
Department of Communities and Local Government. ( 2007). A framework for intervention. London : Author.
10.
DeSousa, C. (2005). Policy performance and brownfield redevelopment in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Professional Geographer, 57, 312-327.
11.
Exec. Order No. 12898: Federal actions to ensure environmental justice in minority and low income communities. (1994, February 11).
12.
Glaeser, E., & Vigdor, J. (2001). Racial segregation in the 2000 census: Promising news. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
13.
Green Leigh, N. (1994). Environmental constraints to brownfield redevelopment . Economic Development Quarterly, 8, 325-328.
14.
Green Leigh, N. (2000). Promoting more equitable brownfield redevelopment . Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
15.
Greenberg, M., & Schneider, D. (1996). Environmentally devastated neighborhoods: Perceptions, policies and realities. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
16.
Gurda, J. (1999). The making of Milwaukee. Milwaukee, WI: Milwaukee County Historical Society.
17.
Hara, D. (2003, May). Market failures and the optimal use of brownfield redevelopment policy instruments. Paper presented at the Canadian Economics Association annual meeting, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
18.
Howland, M. (2007). Employment effects of brownfield redevelopment: What do we know from the literature? Journal of Planning Literature , 22(2), 91-107.
19.
Institute of Medicine. (1999). Toward environmental justice: Research, education, and health policy needs . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
20.
Keating, M. (1997). Public-private partnerships in the United States from a European perspective. In J. Pierre (Ed.) Partnerships in urban governance (pp. 163-174). London: MacMillan.
21.
Lange, D., & McNeil, S. (2004). Clean it and they will come? Defining successful brownfield development. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 130(2), 101-108.
22.
Litt, J., Tran, N., & Burke, T. (2002). Examining urban brownfields through the public health "macroscope." Environmental Health Perspectives, 110, 183-193.
23.
Meyer, P. (1998, November). Accounting for differential neighborhood economic development impacts in site-specific or area-based approaches to urban brownfield regeneration. (Working paper). Louisville, KY: University of Louisville.
24.
Milwaukee Economic Development Corporation. ( 2005a). Online list of tax delinquent properties in Milwaukee . Retrieved September, 2005, from www.medconline.com
25.
Milwaukee Economic Development Corporation. ( 2005b). Online list of moth-balled properties in Milwaukee. Retrieved September, 2005, from www.medconline.com
26.
Milwaukee Economic Development Corporation. ( 2005c). List of city-assisted brownfield redevelopments. Milwaukee, WI: Author.
27.
National Environmental Justice Advisory Committee. (1996). Environmental justice, urban revitalization, and brownfields. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.
28.
Powers, C., Hoffman, F., Brown, D., & Conner, C. (2000). A great experiment: Brownfields pilots catalyze revitalization. New Brunswick, NJ: Institute for Responsible Management.
29.
Rae, D. (1975). The limits of consenual decision. American Political Science Review, 69, 1270-1294.
30.
Sen, A. (1970). Collective choice and social welfare. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
31.
Sheppard, E., Leitner, H., McMaster, R., & Hongguo, T. (1999). GISbased measures of environmental equity. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 9, 18-28.
32.
Simons, R., & Iannone, D. (1997). Brownfields: Supply and demand. Urban Land, 56, 36-78.
33.
Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act, Pub. L. No. 107-118, H.R. 2869 (2001).
34.
Solitare, L., & Greenberg, M. (2002). Is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Brownfields Assessment Pilot Program environmentally just? Environmental Health Perspectives, 110, 249-257.
35.
Timney, M. (1998). Environmental injustices. In D. Camacho (Ed.), Environmental injustices, political struggles (pp. 179-193). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2000a). Online 2000 U.S. census: Summary File 1 (SF1). Retrieved September, 2005, from http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DTGeoSearchByListServlet?ds_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U&state=dt
38.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2000b). Online 2000 U.S. census: Summary File 3 (SF3). Retrieved September, 2005, from http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DTGeoSearchByListServlet?ds_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U&_lang=en&_ts=246564124969
39.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2008). Online 2006 American Community Survey (ACS). Retrieved January 8, 2009, from http://www.census.gov/acs/
40.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1998 ). Final guidance for incorporating environmental justice concerns in EPA's NEPA compliance analyses. Washington, DC: Author.
41.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2002 , June 17). EPA awards $200,000 in brownfields grants to three Connecticut towns. Retrieved September, 2005, from http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/6d651d23f5a91b768525735900400c28/88b65c813987127c852573f3004b4b17!OpenDocument
42.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2005 ). Comprehensive environmental response, compensation, and liability information system (CERCLIS) online list of hazardous waste sites. Retrieved September, 2005, from http://www.epa.gov/Region4/r4data/cerclis/
43.
Walzer, N., & Hamm, G. (2004). Municipal experiences with brownfield redevelopment . Illinois Municipal Review, 83(2), 11-13.
44.
Wernstedt, K., Heberle, L., Alberini, A., & Meyer, P. (2004). The brownfields phenomenon: Much ado about something or the timing of the shrewd? (Discussion paper 04-46). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
45.
Wernstedt, K., Meyer, P., & Yount, K. (2003). Insuring redevelopment at contaminated urban properties . Public Works Management and Policy, 8(2), 85-98.
46.
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. ( 2005a). Bureau of Remediation and Redevelopment tracking system (BRRTS) online list of contaminated sites. Retrieved September, 2005, from http://botw.dnr.state.wi.us/botw/SetUpBasicSearchForm.do
47.
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. ( 2005b). GIS registry online list of contaminated sites. Retrieved September, 2005, from http://dnr.wi.gov/org/aw/rr/brrts/index.htm
