Bartik, T.J., & Bingham, R.D. (1997). Can economic development programs be evaluated? In R. D. Bingham & R. Mier (Eds.), Dilemmas of urban economic development (pp. 246-277). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
Commission of the European Communities. (2006 ). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the council establishing the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund. Retrieved January 2, 2008, from http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/news/2006/mar/com06091_final_en.pdf
3.
Feller, I. (1999, September). Strategic options to enhance the research competitiveness of EPSCoR universities. Paper presented at the American Association for the Advancement of Science Workshop on Academic Research Competitiveness, Coeur D'Alene, Idaho.
4.
Fitzgerald, J., & Green Leigh, N. (2002). Economic revitalization: Cases and strategies for city and suburb. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Glasmeier, A. (2002). One nation, pulling apart: The basis of persistent poverty in the United States. Progress in Human Geography , 26(2), 155-173.
6.
Glasmeier, A. (2004). Geographic intersections of regional science: Reflections on Walter Isard's contributions to geography. International Journal of Regional Science, 6(1), 27-41.
7.
Glasmeier, A. (2005). An atlas of poverty in America: One nation, pulling apart, 1960-2003. New York: Routledge .
8.
Glasmeier, A., Fuellhart, K., & Wood, L. (2006). Measuring economic distress: A comparison of designations and measures. Mississippi State: Mississippi State University, Southern Rural Development Center.
9.
Lee, Y.S. (2001). Does geographical proximity matter? The spatial dynamics of the South Korean and Japanese automobile industries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
10.
Malizia, E., & Feser, E. (1999). Understanding local economic development. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy Research.
11.
Markusen, A. (1977). Federal budget simplification: Preventive programs vs. palliatives for local governments with booming, stable and declining economies . National Tax Journal, 30(3), 249-258.
12.
Markusen, A. (2000). Planning as craft and as philosophy. In L. Rodwin & B. Sanyal (Eds.), The profession of city planning: Changes, images and challenges (1950-2000) (pp. 261-274). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy Research.
13.
Markusen, A. (2003). Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: The case for rigor and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Regional Studies, 37(6/7), 701-717.
14.
Markusen, A. (in press). Human versus physical capital: Government's role in regional development. In J. Martinez-Vazquez & F. Vaillancourt (Eds.), The role of government in regional economic development. Oxford , UK: Routledge.
15.
Markusen, A., & Schrock, G. (in press). The distinctive city: Production, consumption, identity . Manuscript submitted for publication.
16.
Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2003). Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea. Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1), 5-35.
17.
Yin, R., & Feller, I. (1999). A report on the evaluation of the National Science Foundation's experimental program to stimulate competitive research. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. Retrieved January 8, 2008, from www.nsf.gov/pubs/1999/nsf99115/nsf99115.txt
