The purpose of this exploratory study is an attempt to identify public policies that have the potential to increase the economic viability of smaller metropolitan areas and cities. The authors identify characteristics associated with smaller metro areas that performed better than expected (winners) and worse than expected (losers) during the 1990s. The authors then look for evidence that public policy choices may have enhanced a metro area' ability to succeed by examining whether winners and losers are qualitatively different in ways that may indicate consequences of policy choices. A cluster analysis is completed to group the metro areas based on changes in social, economic, and demographic variables during the 1990s. The authors then use contingency table analysis and ANOVA to see if winners and losers are related to the grouping of metro areas in a way that may indicate the presence of government policy.
Anselin, L., Varga L., & Acs, Z. J. (1997). Entrepreneurship, geographic spillovers and university research: A spatial econometric approach (Working paper no. WP59). Cambridge, UK: Economic and Social Research Council, Centre for Business Research.
2.
Barrow, M., & Hall, M. (1995). The impact of a large multinational organization on a small local economy. Regional Studies, 29(7), 635-653.
3.
Bee, E. (2003). Knowledge networks and technical invention in America' metropolitan areas: A paradigm for high-technology economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 17(2), 115-131.
4.
Berube, A. (2003a). Gaining but losing ground: Population change in large cities and their suburbs. In B. Katz & R. Lang (Eds.), Redefining urban and suburban America: Evidence from Census 2000 (pp. 33-50). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
5.
Berube, A. (2003b). Racial and ethnic change in the nation' largest cities. In B. Katz & R. Lang (Eds.), Redefining urban and suburban America: Evidence from Census 2000 (pp. 137-154). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
6.
Bourne, L. S. (1991). The Roepke lecture in economic geography: Recycling urban systems and metropolitan areas: A geographical agenda for the 1990s and beyond. Economic Geography, 67(3), 185-209.
7.
Camagni, R. (2002). Cities and the quality of life: Problems and prospects. Review of Economic Conditions in Italy, 1, 61-83.
8.
Cook, A. K., & Beck, D. M. (1991). Metropolitan dominance versus decentralization in the information age. Social Science Quarterly, 72(2), 284-298.
9.
Crihfield, J. B., & Panggabean, M. (1995). Growth and convergence in U.S. cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 38(2), 138-165.
10.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1992). Crime in the United States, 1990. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
11.
Flores, E. G. (2003). Introduction from the chair. The Mayors Business Council. Retrieved April 2004 from http://usmayors.org/uscm/buscouncil
12.
Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.
13.
Foust, D. (2003, October 6). Blues for a company town. Business Week, p.56-56.
14.
Friedman, J. J. (1995). The effects of industrial structure and resources upon the distribution of fast-growing small firms among U.S. urbanized areas. Urban Studies, 32, 863-884.
15.
Fulton, W., & Shigley, P. (2001). Small towns hang on. Planning, 67(4), 20-26.
16.
Gabaix, X. (1999). Zipf' Law and the growth of cities. American Economic Review, 89(2), 129-132.
17.
Glaeser, E., Kallal, H., Scheinkman, J., & Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 1126-1152.
18.
Glaeser, E., & Shapiro, J. (2003a). City growth: Which places grew and why. In B. Katz & R. Lang (Eds.), Redefining urban and suburban America: Evidence from Census 2000 (pp. 13-32). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
19.
Glaeser, E., & Shapiro, J. (2003b). Urban growth in the 1990s: Is city living back?Journal of Regional Science, 43(1), 139-165.
20.
Goodman, L. A., & Kruskal, W. H. (1972). Measures of association for cross classification IV: Simplification of asymptotic variances. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67, 415-421.
21.
Gottlieb, P. (1995). Residential amenities, firm location and economic development. Urban Studies, 32, 1413-1436.
22.
Gottlieb, P. (2001). Older cenral counties in the new economy (Working paper). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration.
23.
Johnson, J., Jr. (2002). A conceptual model for enhancing community competitiveness in the new economy. Urban Affairs Review, 378, 763-779.
24.
Kazis, R., & Miller, M. S. (Eds.). (2001). Knowledge and urban economic development: An evolutionary perspective on low-wage workers in the new economy. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
25.
Kelley, C. (1996). In search of new life for smaller cities. Public Management, 78, 36-37.
26.
Kirsch, M. H. (1998). In the wake of the giant: Multinational restructuring and uneven development in a New England community. Albany: State University of New York Press.
27.
Krugman, P. (1998). Space: The final frontier. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(2), 161-174.
28.
Lambooy, J. G. (2002). Knowledge and urban economic development: An evolutionary perspective. Urban Studies, 39, 1019-1035.
29.
Lovering, J. (1999). Theory led by policy: The inadequacies of the “new regionalism.”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23, 379-395.
30.
Markusen, A. (1985). Profit cycles, oligopoly, and regional development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
Markusen, A., & Carlson, V. (1989). Deindustrialization in the American Midwest: Causes and responses. In L. Rodwin & H. Sazanami (Eds.), Deindustrialization and regional ecnomic transformation: The experience of the United States(pp. 29-59). Boston: Unwin Hyman.
32.
Markusen, A., Lee, Y. S., & DiGiovanna, S. (Eds.). (1999). Second tier cities: Rapid growth beyond the metropolis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
33.
Martin, S. A., McHugh, R., & Johnson, S. R. (1991). The influence of location on productivity: Manufacturing technology in rural and urban areas (Discussion paper no. 91-10). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies.
34.
Mayer, H., & Greenberg, M. (2001). Coming back from economic despair: Case studies of small- and medium-size American cities. Economic Development Quarterly, 15, 203-216.
35.
Moore, T. (1996). The disposable workforce: Worker displacement and employment instability in America. New York: Aldine DeGruyter.
36.
Moses, N. (2001). Have a plan, and make the most of arts and culture. Public Management, 83(11), 18-21.
37.
National Climate Data Center. (2003). Local Climatological Data Annual Summary. Retrieved November 2003 from http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwAW%7EMP%7EF
38.
National League of Cities. (2003). Is the federal-state-local partnership being dismantled? Retrieved February 2004 from www.nic.org/nic_org/site/files/pdf/resh_prtsep03.pdf
39.
Ó hUallacháin, B. (1999). Patent places: Size matters. Journal of Regional Science, 39, 613-636.
40.
Orr, M., & West, D. (2002). Citizens' views on urban revitalization: The case of Providence, Rhode Island. Urban Affairs Review, 37, 397-419.
41.
Pack, J. R. (2002). Growth and convergence in metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
42.
Palmer, B. D. (1994). Goodyear invades the backcountry: The corporate takeover of a rural town. New York: Monthly Review.
43.
Plummer, P., & Taylor, M. (2001a). Theories of local economic growth (Part 1): Concepts, models, and measurement. Environment and Planning A, 33, 219-236.
44.
Plummer, P., & Taylor, M. (2001b). Theories of local economic growth (Part 2): Model specification and empirical validation. Environment and Planning A, 33, 385-398.
45.
Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 4(1), 15-30.
46.
Porter, M. E. (2003). The economic performance of regions. Regional Studies, 37, 549-578.
47.
Raymond, R., & Pascarella, T. (1987). Local economic development programs and small city growth in Northeastern Ohio, 1970-1980. In D. McKee & R. Bennett (Eds.), Structural change in an urban industrial region (pp. 137-154). New York: Praeger.
Rutten, R., Boekema, F., & Kuijpers, E. (2003). Economic geography of higher education: Knowledge infrastructure and learning regions. New York: Routledge.
50.
Shilton, L., & Stanley, C. (1999). Spatial patterns of headquarters. Journal of Real Estate Research, 17, 341-364.
51.
Siegel, B., & Waxman, A. (2001). Third tier cities: Adjusting to the new economy. Reviews of Economic Development Literature and Practice, No. 6. Washington, DC: U. S. Economic Development Administration.
52.
Singer, A. (2004, February). The rise of new immigrant gateways. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Retrieved March 2004 from http://www.brookings.edu/metro/publications/20040301_gateways.htm
53.
Smith, E. D. (1990). Economic stability and economic growth in rural communities: Dimensions relevant to local employment creation strategy. Growth and Change, 21(4), 3-18.
54.
Strom, E. (2002). Converting pork into porcelain: Cultural institutions and downtown development. Urban Affairs Review, 38(1), 3-21.
55.
Teaford, J. (1994). Cities of the heartland: The rise and fall of the industrial Midwest. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
56.
U. S. Bureau of the Census. (1983). Census of population and housing 1980 summary tape file 3A. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Commerce.
57.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1993). Census of population and housing 1990 summary file 3 sample data. Retrieved November 2003 from http://www.census.gov/main/www/cen1990.html
58.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2003). Census of population and housing 2000 Summary file 3 sample data. Retrieved November 2003 from http://www.census.gov/main/www/cen2000.html
59.
U. S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2003). Regional Economic Information System (REIS). Retrieved November 2003 from www.bea.gov/bea/regional/statelocal.htm
60.
U. S. Conference of Mayors. (2004). U.S. metro economics special report: Employment update for the State of Michigan, types of jobs lost and gained, 2001-2006. Boston: Global Insight.
61.
U. S. Department of Commerce. (1993). County business patterns, 1990. Washington, DC: Author.
62.
U. S. Department of Commerce. (1994). Census of government, 1992. Washington, DC: Author.
63.
U. S. Department of Commerce. (1999). Census of government, 1997. Washington, DC: Author.
64.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (1999). Now is the time: Places left behind in the new economy. Retrieved November 2003 from http://www.hud.gov/library/bookshelf18/pressrel/leftbehind/menu.html
65.
Wassmer, R. (1994). Can local incentives alter a metropolitan city' economic development?Urban Studies, 31, 1251-1278.
66.
Watts, H. D., & Kirkham, J. D. (1999). Plant closures by multi-locational firms: A comparative perspective. Regional Studies, 33, 413-424.
67.
Weissbourd, R. (2004). The changing dynamics of urban America. Retrieved November 15, 2004, from http://www.ceosforcities.org
68.
Wojan, T. R., & Pulver, G. C. (1995). Location patterns of high growth industries in rural counties. Growth and Change, 26(1), 3-22.
69.
Wolman, H. L., Ford, C. C., III, & Hill, E. (1994). Evaluating the success of urban success stories. Urban Studies, 31, 835-850.
70.
Zelinsky, W. (1962). Has American industry been decentralizing? The evidence for the 1939-1954 period. Economic Geography, 38, 251-269.
