Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between educational attainment at the bachelor’s degree level and subsequent economic growth in U.S. metropolitan areas. It reviews the theoretical literature in human capital that predicts faster productivity and income growth in cities that have high education levels and numerous opportunities for inter- action among skilled workers. In this study, the authors found that there was a significant relationship between educational attainment in 1980 and the rate of per capita income and employment growth during the next 17 years. We found some evidence of divergence in the incomes of the most- and least-educated metros, raising the prospect of a new inequality across U.S. regions driven by cumulative differences in human cap- ital stocks. The study lists several possible causes of high educational attainment in metropolitan areas, concluding that this is a difficult but nevertheless worthwhile instrumental goal for policy makers.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barro, R., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 223-251.

Beeson, P. (1992). Agglomeration economies and productivity growth. In E. Mills & J. McDonald (Eds.), Sources of metropolitan growth (pp. 19-35). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, Center for Urban Policy Research.

Benhabib, J., & Spiegel, M. (1994). The role of human capital in economic development: Evidence from aggregate cross- country data. Journal of Monetary Economics, 34, 143-173.

Carlino, G. (1995, January/February).Do education and training lead to faster growth in cities? Business Review of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, pp. 15-22.

Carlino, G., & Mills, L. (1994, September/October). Convergence and the U.S. states: A time series analysis (Working Paper No. 94-13). Philadelphia: Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.

Fogarty, M. (1997). Picking a future: Should Ohio increase its investments in higher education? Cleveland, OH: Case Western Reserve University, Center for Regional Economic Issues.

Fogarty, M., & Garofalo, G. (1978). An exploration of the real productivity effects of cities. Review of Regional Studies, 5 (11), 65-82.

Fogarty, M., Garofalo, G., & Malhotra, D. (1992, November). Geography, increasing returns, and regional productivity. Paper presented at the meetings of the Regional Science Association, Chicago.

Garofalo, G., & Fogarty, M. (1982, August). A note on the measurement of agglomeration economies with compensation for urban disamenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 10, 383-387.

10.

Glaeser, E., & Mare, D. (1994, May). Cities and skills (Working Paper No. 4730). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.

11.

Hawley, C., & Fogarty, M. (1981). Can agglomeration economies explain why people are leaving large cities? Environment and Planning A, 13, 225-230.

12.

Lerman, R. (1997). Meritocracy without rising inequality? Wage rate differences are widening by education and narrowing by gender and race. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.

13.

Lucas, R. (1988, July). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3-42.

14.

Mathur, V. (1999). Human capital-based strategy for regional economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 13, 203-216.

15.

Moomaw, R., & Williams, M. (1991). Total factor productivity growth in manufacturing: Further evidence from the states. Journal of Regional Science, 31, 17-34.

16.

Pack, J. (2002). Growth and convergence in metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

17.

Peterson, G., & Vroman, W. (1992). Urban labor markets and economic opportunity. In G. Peterson & W. Vroman (Eds.), Urban labor markets and job opportunity (pp. 1-29). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.

18.

Rauch, J. (1993). Productivity gains from geographic concentration of human capital: Evidence from cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 34, 380-400.

19.

Romer, P. (1990, May). Are non-convexities important for understanding growth? American Economic Review, 80, 97-103.

20.

Simon, C. (1998). Human capital and metropolitan employment growth. Journal of Urban Economics, 43, 223-243.

21.

U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1980). Census of population 1980. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

22.

U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2000). Census of population 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

23.

U.S. Department of Commerce. (1998). Per capita income and total employment for 1980 and 1997 [CD-ROM]. Washing- ton, DC: Author.

Educational Attainment and Metropolitan Growth

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References