Knowledge Networks and Technical Invention in America's Metropolitan Areas: A Paradigm for High-Technology Economic Development

Abstract

The presence of high-technology jobs defined the regional winners in economic growth during the past decade. Countless communities around the United States tried to clone Silicon Valley to accelerate their own growth rates, but these programs consistently failed. This research demonstrates that all innovation is not tied to microchips and silicon. Seven other technologies are growing within the United States. Each of these technologies forms a “knowledge network” of innovations that resemble the Pareto distribution of national wealth, suggesting that technology behaves according to the principles of social networks. Patent data refute the folklore that small companies are more innovative than large ones. The principal distinction among innovative regions and less innovative regions is the number of large corporate research and development centers.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Birch, D. (1987). Job creation in America: How our smallest companies put the most people to work. New York: Free Press.

Birch, D., & Medoff, J. (1994). Gazelles. In L. C. Solmon & A. R. Levenson (Eds.), Labor markets, employment policy, and job creation (pp. 159-168). Boulder, CO: Westview.

Castells, M., & Hall, P. (1994). Technopoles of the world: The making of twenty-first century industrial complexes. London: Routledge.

Christensen, C. (2002). The rules of innovation. Technology Review, 104(6), 33-38.

DeVol, R. (1999). America's high tech economy: Growth, development and risks for metropolitan areas. Los Angeles: Milken Insitute.

Divide and conquer. (2002, June 24). Forbes ASAP, p. 84.

Hall, B. H., Jaffe, B., & Tratjenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights, and methodological tools. (NBER Working Paper No. 8498). Retrieved from http://papers.nber.org/papers/w8498.pdf

Hall, P. (1998). Cities in civilization. New York: Fromm International.

Harrison, B. (1994). The myth of small firms as the predominant job generators. Economic Development Quarterly, 8(1), 3-18.

10.

Jaffe, A. (1989, December). Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review, 79(5), 957-970.

11.

Kaderlan, N., & Ronstadt, R. (1998). Facilitating nonprofit startups: What is the best way? (Working paper). Austin: University of Texas, IC2 Institute.

12.

Marshall, A. (1895). Principles of economics. New York: Macmillan.

13.

National Science Foundation. (1998). Science and technology indicators (pp. 46-53). Washington, DC: Author.

14.

Pareto, V. (1971). Manual of political economy (A.S. Schwier, Trans.). New York: A.M. Kelley. (Original work published 1897)

15.

Porter, M. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15-34.

16.

Pred, A. (1977). City systems in advanced economies. New York: Halstead.

17.

Stern, S., Porter, M., & Furman, J. (2000). The determinants of national innovation capacity (Working Paper No. 7876). New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.