The dominant explanation for city policy choices over the past two decades has been the city limits story. This scenario represents the application of public choice theory to local policy making. Theorists argue that rational self-interest by cities compels local elected officials to favor developmental policies and compete with other jurisdictions. Inefficient economic development outcomes and evolving trends in the practice of economic development prompt a reevaluation of the city limits story as the primary explanation for economic development policies. This research investigates the influence of intercity competition and other factors on the support for economic development by cities. Results from regression analyses using data from a sample survey of U.S. local economic development professionals reveal virtually no support for the city limits story. However, the population needs within cities, the support of elected officials, and the existence of formal economic development planning did influence support for economic development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agranoff, R. , & McGuire, M. (1998). The intergovernmental context of local economic development. State and Local Government Review, 30(3), 150-165.
2.
Appleton, L. M. , & Clark, T. N. (1989). Coping in American cities: Fiscal austerity and urban innovations in the 1980s. In S. E. Clarke (Ed.), Urban innovation and autonomy (pp. 31-68). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Bachrach, P. , & Baratz, M. S. (1962). Two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56, 947-952.
4.
Basolo, V. (2000). City spending on economic development versus affordable housing: Does inter-city competition or local politics drive decisions?Journal of Urban Affairs, 22(3), 317-332.
5.
Basolo, V. , & Lowery, D. (2000). Measuring intercity competition: An alternative approach. Unpublished manuscript.
6.
Bish, R. L. , & Ostrom, V. (1973). Understanding urban government. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
7.
Blair, J. P. , & Kumar, R. (1997). Is local economic development a zero-sum game? In R. D. Bingham & R. Mier (Eds.), Dilemmas of urban economic development: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 1-20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Cable, B. R. , Feiock, R., & Kim, J. (1993). The consequences of institutionalized access for economic development policy making in the United States. Economic Development Quarterly, 7, 91-97.
9.
Clark, T. N. , & Ferguson, L. C. (1983). City money. New York: Columbia University Press.
10.
Clarke, S. E. , & Gaile, G. L. (1997). Local politics in a global era: Thinking locally, acting globally. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 551, 28-43.
11.
Dahl, R. A. (1961). Who governs?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12.
Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: John Wiley.
13.
Downs, A. (1994). New visions for metropolitan America. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution; Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
14.
Eisinger, P. K. (1988). The rise of the entrepreneurial state. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
15.
Elkin, S. L. (1987). City and regime in the American republic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Feiock, R. C. , & Clingermayer, J. (1986). Municipal representation, executive power, and economic development policy activity. Policy Studies Journal, 15, 211-229.
17.
Fisher, P. S. , & Peters, A. H. (1998). Industrial incentives: Competition among American states and cities. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
18.
Fleischmann, A. , Green, G. P., & Kwong, T. M. (1992). What’s a city to do? Explaining differences in local economic development policies. Western Political Science Quarterly, 45, 677-699.
19.
Foreman, E. K. (1991). Survey sampling principles. New York: Marcel Dekker.
20.
Gale, D. E. (1987). Washington, D.C., inner-city revitalization and minority suburbanization. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
21.
Goetz, E. (1990). Type II policy and mandated benefits in economic development. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 26, 170-190.
22.
Green, G. P. , & Fleischmann, A. (1991). Promoting economic development: A comparison of central cities, suburbs, and non-metropolitan communities. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 27, 145-154.
23.
Greenstone, J. D. , & Peterson, P. E. (1976). Race and authority in urban politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Hunter, F. (1953). Community power structure. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
25.
Imbroscio, D. , Orr, M., Ross, T., & Stone, C. (1995). Baltimore and the human investment challenge. In F. W. Wagner, T. E. Joder, & A. J. Mumphrey, Jr. (Eds.), Urban revitalization (pp. 38-68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Jennings, K. (1964). Community influentials. New York: Free Press.
27.
Kasarda, J. D. , Appold, S. J., Sweeney, S. H., & Sieff, E. (1997). Central-city and suburban migration patterns: Is a turn-around on the horizon?Housing Policy Debate, 8(2), 307-358.
28.
Keating, M. (1991). Comparative urban politics: Power and the city in the United States, Canada, Britain, and France. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.
29.
Kish, L. (1967). Survey sampling. New York: John Wiley.
30.
Logan, J. , & Molotch, H. (1987). Urban fortunes. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31.
Longoria, T., Jr. (1994). Empirical analysis of the city limits typology. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 30(1), 102-113.
32.
Mollenkopf, J. H. (1983). The contested city. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
Molotch, H. (1976). The city as a growth machine. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 309-332.
34.
Molotch, H. , & Logan, J. (1984). Tensions in the growth machine. Social Problems, 31, 483-499.
35.
Moss, M. L. (1997). Reinventing the central city as a place to live and work. Housing Policy Debate, 8(2), 471-490.
36.
Ostrom, V. , Bish, R., & Ostrom, E. (1988). Local government in the United States. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
37.
Pagano, M. A. , & Bowman, A. O. (1995). Cityscapes and capital. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
38.
Peterson, P. E. (1981). City limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
Polsby, N. (1963). Community power and political theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
40.
Reese, L. A. (1991). Municipal fiscal health and tax abatement policy. Economic Development Quarterly, 5, 23-32.
41.
Reese, L. A. (1997). Local economic development policy: The United States and Canada. New York: Garland.
42.
Reese, L. A. (1999). Modeling economic development decision making: The case of tax abatements. Policy Studies Review, 16(2), 175-193.
43.
Reese, L. A. , & Fasenfast, D. (1997). What works best? Values and evaluation of local economic development policy. Economic Development Quarterly, 11, 195-207.
44.
Rondinelli, D. A. , Johnson, J. H., Jr., & Kasarda, J. D. (1998). The changing forces of urban economic development: Globalization and city competitiveness in the 21st century. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 3(3), 71-105.
45.
Rubin, H. J. (1988). Shoot anything that flies; claim anything that falls: Conversations with economic development practitioners. Economic Development Quarterly, 2, 236-251.
46.
Rubin, I. , & Rubin, H. J. (1987). Economic development incentives: The poor (cities) pay more. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 23, 37-62.
47.
Saiz, M. (1999). Mayoral perceptions of development and redistributive policies. Urban Affairs Review, 34(6), 820-842.
48.
Schneider, M. (1989). The competitive city. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
49.
Sharp, E. B. , & Elkins, D. R. (1991). The politics of economic development policy. Economic Development Quarterly, 5, 126-139.
50.
Stoker, G. (1995). Regime theory and urban politics. In D. Judge, G. Stoker, & H. Wolman (Eds.), Theories of urban politics (pp. 54-71). London: Sage.
51.
Stone, C. N. (1986). Power and social complexity. In R. Waste (Ed.), Community power: Directions for future research (pp. 77-113). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
52.
Stone, C. N. (1989). Regime politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
53.
Stone, C. N. (1993). Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: A political economy approach. Journal of Urban Affairs, 15(1), 1-28.
54.
Swanstrom, T. (1985). The crisis of growth politics: Cleveland, Kucinich and the challenge of urban populism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
55.
Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416-424.
56.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census . (1992). 1990 census of population and housing summary tape file 1C [CD-ROM]. Washington, DC: Author.
57.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census . (1993). 1990 census of population and housing summary tape File 3C [CD-ROM]. Washington DC: Author.
58.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census . (1995). County and city data book 1994 [CD-ROM]. Washington, DC: Author.
59.
Waste, R. J. (1989). The ecology of city policy making. New York: Oxford University Press.
60.
Wildavsky, A. (1964). Leadership in a small town. Totawa, NJ: Bedminster.
61.
Wolman, H. (with Spitzley, D.). (1996). The politics of local economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 10, 115-150.
62.
Wong, K. K. (1990). City choices: Education and housing. Albany: State University of New York Press.
