This article examines recent changes in toxic waste policy in the United States. It argues that major deviations from the framework established by the Comprehensive Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) have occurred. Examples include a shifting of program authority to the states, a modification of traditional command and control program structures, and perhaps most important, the adoption of economic development as a core program goal.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, D. (1991, May). Woodstock meets Superfund. Public Management, 73, 7-9.
2.
Andrews, R. N. (2000). Risk-based decision making. In N. Vig & M. E. Kraft (Eds.), Environmental policy in the 1990’s (4th ed., pp. 210-231). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
3.
Bartsch, C. , & Anderson, C. (1998). Matrix of brownfield programs by state. Washington, DC: Northeast-Midwest Institute.
4.
Bartsch, C. , & Collaton, E. (1997). Brownfields: Cleaning and reusing contaminated properties. Westport, CT: Praeger.
5.
Bartsch, C. , Collaton, E., Pepper, E., & Northeast-Midwest Institute (U.S.). (1996). Coming clean for economic development: A resource book on environmental cleanup and economic development (Rev. ed.) [Online]. Washington, DC: Northeast-Midwest Institute. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://nemw.org/cmclean.htm
6.
Committee on Commerce Correspondence . (1999). EPA’s Brownfields Cleanup Revolving Loan Fund Program [Online]. Washington, DC: U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Commerce. Retrieved April 20, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://com-notes.house.gov/cchear/hearings106.nsf/b2cc6be46b2b2d2285256720007e4972?OpenView&%20Start=7.6
7.
Consumers Renaissance Development Corporation . (1998). National comparative analysis of brownfield redevelopment programs. Jackson, MI: Author.
8.
Copeland, C. (1997). Superfund and the states: The state role and other issues (97-953 ENR). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
9.
Environmental Law Institute . (1989). An analysis of state superfund programs: 50-state study. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response Hazardous Site Control Division.
10.
Environmental Law Institute . (1998). An analysis of state superfund programs: 50-state study, 1997 update. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response Hazardous Site Control Division.
11.
Freedman, A. (1997a, June 28). Congress prepares new assault on troubled Superfund sites. Congressional Quarterly, pp. 1502-1507.
12.
Freedman, A. (1997b, March 22). Stand-alone brownfields bills miffs House Republicans. Congressional Quarterly, p. 710.
13.
Glaser, M. , & Cherches, C. (1992). Local government’s role in groundwater cleanup. Public Management, 74(2), 4-10.
14.
Goode, A. E. , Collaton, E., Bartsch, C., Strother, P., Gray, B., & Pepper, E. (1999). Guide to federal brownfield programs. Washington, DC: Northeast-Midwest Institute.
15.
Gray, L. (1995). Superfund cleanup standards reconsidered (95-1076 ENG). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
16.
Grunbaum, W. F. (1988). Judicial enforcement of the hazardous waste liability law. In C. E. Davis & J. P. Lester (Eds.), Dimensions of hazardous waste policy (pp. 163-175). New York: Greenwood.
17.
Hird, J. A. (1994). Superfund. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
18.
Hula, R. (1999a, September). The Michigan Brownfield Initiative. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association annual meeting, Atlanta, GA.
19.
Hula, R. (1999b). Public backs brownfield redevelopment. Urban Policy Briefing, 99(3), 1-4.
20.
International City/County Management Association . (1993). Managing Superfund’s impact: A first-aid kit. Washington, DC: Author.
21.
International City/County Management Association . (1997). Brownfields: Options and opportunities. MIS Report, 29(5), 1-24.
22.
Kaiser, S. -E. (1998). Brownfields National Partnership: The federal role in brownfield redevelopment. Public Works Management and Policy, 2(3), 196-201.
23.
Kamienieki, S. , Obrien, R., & Clar, M. (1986). Environmental policy and aspects of intergovernmental relations. In J. E. Benton & D. R. Morgan (Eds.), Intergovernmental relations and public policy (pp. 49-62). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
24.
Kirshenberg, S. D. , & Bartsch, C. (1997). Brownfields: Options and opportunities. Washington, DC: Management Information Service.
25.
Kraft, M. E. , & Vig, N. J. (1994). Environmental policy from the 1970s to the 1990s: Continuity and change. In N. J. Vig & M. E. Kraft (Eds.), Environmental policy in the 1990s (pp. 1-30). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
26.
Lucero, G. A. (1991). Cleanup of old waste: Some thoughts on the fundamentals of Superfund. Risk Analysis, 11, 66.
27.
Mazmanian, D. , & Morell, D. (1992). Beyond superfailure: America’s toxics policy for the 1990s. San Francisco: Westview.
28.
McGrath, D. T. (2000). Urban industrial land redevelopment and contamination risk. Journal of Urban Economics, 47, 414-442.
29.
Meltz, R. (1998). Superfund Act reauthorization: Liability issues (98-136A). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
30.
Meyer, P. B. , & Deitrick, S. (1998). Brownfields and public works. Public Works Management and Policy, 2(3), 202-209.
31.
Michigan State University, Center for Urban Affairs . (1998). Urban summit: Proceedings. East Lansing: Author.
32.
Pope, C. (1999, July 31). As Superfund bill awaits markup, the only constant is change. Congressional Quarterly, p. 1840.
33.
Rahm, D. (1999a, December 2-5). Coming into compliance: Environmental contamination and the nuclear weapons complex. Paper presented at the National Public Management Research Conference, George Bush School of Government and Public Service, Texas A&M University, College Station.
34.
Rahm, D. (1999b, September). Environmental policy and the nuclear weapons complex. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association annual meeting, Atlanta, GA.
35.
Reisch, M. (1997). Superfund: The brownfield issue (97-731 ENG). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
36.
Reisch, M. (1998). Superfund reauthorization issues in the 105th Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
37.
Reisch, M. (1999). Superfund reauthorization issues in the 106th Congress (1B10011). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
38.
Reisch, M. , & Breardon, D. M. (1997). Superfund fact book (97-312 ENR). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
39.
Rosenbaum, W. A. (1995). Environmental politics and policy. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
40.
Scheberle, D. (1997). Federalism and environmental policy: Trust and the politics of implementation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
41.
Stephen, M. (1998, September). Mobilization and influence: Communities and EPA’s Superfund program. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association annual meeting, Boston.
42.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . (1997a). Liability and other guidance (EPA 500-F-97-104). Washington, DC: Author.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . (1998c). Fact sheet: Brownfields showcase communities. Washington, DC: EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
47.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . (1998d). Handbook of tools for managing federal Superfund liability risks at brownfields and other sites (EPA 330-B-98-001). Washington, DC: Author.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . (1999a). The brownfields national partnership action agenda accomplishment report [Online]. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved January 24, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.epa.gov/brownfields/99aa.htm
50.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . (1999b). Environmental protection: Agencies have made progress in implementing the federal brownfield initiative (GAO/RCED-99-86). Washington, DC: Author.
51.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . (1999c). Statement of Carol M. Browner, Administrator of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, before the Subcommittee on Water Resources and the Environment, U.S. House of Representatives on May 12, 1999 [Online]. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved January 11, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.epa/superfund/new/congress
52.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . (1999d). Statement of Timothy Fields, Jr., Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, United States Environmental Protection Agency, before the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, U.S. House of Representatives. Washington, DC: Author.
53.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . (1999e). Superfund reforms summary sheet: Background [Online]. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved January 22, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.epa.gov/oerrpage/superfund/programs/reforms/docs.htm%23general
54.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . (1999f). Superfund reforms summary sheet: Round 1 [Online]. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved January 22, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.epa.gov/oerrpage/superfund/programs/reforms/docs.htm%23general
55.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . (1999g). Superfund reforms summary sheet: Round 2 [Online]. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved January 22, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.epa.gov/oerrpage/superfund/programs/reforms/docs.htm%23general
56.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . (1999h). Superfund reforms summary sheet: Round 3 [Online]. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved January 22, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.epa.gov/oerrpage/superfund/programs/reforms/docs.htm%23general
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . (1999j). Vice President Gore announces $11 million to clean up and redevelop distressed areas. Washington, DC: Author.
59.
U.S. General Accounting Office . (1995). Superfund legal expenses (GAO/RCED-95-46). Washington, DC: Author.
60.
U.S. General Accounting Office . (1997). Superfund: State voluntary programs provide incentives to encourage cleanups (GAO/RCED-97-66). Washington, DC: Author.
61.
U.S. General Accounting Office . (1998). Superfund: EPA’s use of funds for brownfield revitalization (GAO/RCED-98-87). Washington, DC: Author.
62.
U.S. General Accounting Office . (1999). Superfund: Progress, problems and outlook (GAO/T-RCED-99-128). Washington, DC: Author.
63.
U.S. health aide says he erred on Times Beach . (1991, May 26). The New York Times, p. 20.
64.
U.S. House of Representatives . (1999, August 4). Testimony of Tim Fields, Assistant Administrator, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC: Subcommittee on Finance and Hazardous Materials.
65.
Vig, N. J. (2000). Environmental policy in Congress: From consensus to gridlock. In N. J. Vig & M. E. Kraft (Eds.), Environmental policy: New directions for the twenty-first century (4th ed., pp. 121-145). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
66.
Vig, N. J. , & Kraft, M. E. (2000). Environmental policy from the 1970’s to 2000: An overview. In N. J. Vig & M. E. Kraft (Eds.), Environmental policy: New directions for the twenty-first century (4th ed., pp. 1-32). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
67.
Walsh, B. C. (1997). Seeding the brownfields: A proposed statute limiting environmental liability for perspective purchasers. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 34(1), 191-234.
68.
White House: Office of the Vice President . (1997). Vice President Gore announces expansion of brownfield initiative [Online]. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved January 24, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.epa.gov/swerosps/bf/html-doc/wh051397.htm
