The use of local economic development incentives within a metropolitan area has undergone less analysis than incentives that attempt to alter interregional business location decisions. This is unfortunate because other factors that influence where business resides are constant across cities in a metropolitan area, and a properly used incentive is more likely to alter a business location decision. To comment on these issues, the authors use a simultaneous equation model to conduct regression analyses of panel data from 112 cities in the Detroit metropolitan area. They find that only certain forms of local incentives, at certain times, exert the expected positive influence on the local value of commercial and manufacturing property. The findings are tied to issues related to the redistribution of economic activity from the core to the periphery in U.S. metropolitan areas, and the authors conclude with policy suggestions on the future use of local incentives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, J. E. (1990). Tax increment financing: Municipal adoption and growth. National Tax Journal, 43, 155-164.
2.
Anderson, J. E. , & Wassmer, R. W. (1995). The decision to “bid for business”: Municipal behavior in granting property tax abatements. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 25, 739-757.
3.
Anderson, J. E. , & Wassmer, R. W. (2000). Bidding for business: The efficacy of local incentive use in a metropolitan area. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
4.
Bartik, T. J. (1991). Who benefits from state and local economic development policies?Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
5.
Bartik, T. J. (1994). Jobs, productivity, and local economic development: What implications does economic research have for the role of government?National Tax Journal, 47, 847-861.
6.
Bound, J. , Jaeger, D. A., & Baker, R. (1995). Problems with instrumental variable estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 443-450.
7.
Burstein, M. L. , & Rolnick, A. J. (1995). Congress should end the bidding war among the states. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, the Region, 9, 1-13.
8.
Citizens Research Council of Michigan . (1986). Municipal government economic development incentive programs in Michigan. Detroit: Author.
9.
Dardia, M. (1998). Subsidizing redevelopment in California. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
10.
Downs, A. (1994). New visions for metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; and Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
11.
Fischel, W. A. (1985). The economics of zoning laws. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12.
Fisher, R. C. (1995). State and local public finance (2nd ed.). Chicago: Irwin.
13.
Fisher, R. C. , & Kohlhase, J. E. (1986). Fiscal problems and policies of the cities. In H. E. Brazer & D. S. Laren (Eds.), Michigan’s fiscal and economic structure (pp. 854-892). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
14.
Goetz, E. G. , & Kayser, T. (1993). Competition and cooperation in economic development: A study of the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Economic Development Quarterly, 7, 63-78.
15.
Greene, W. H. (1998). LIMDEP Version 7.0: User’s manual and reference guide. Bellport, NY: Econometric Software Incorporated.
16.
Gujarati, D. (1995). Basic econometrics (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
17.
Holmes, T. J. (1995). Analyzing a proposal to ban state tax breaks to business. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Quarterly Review, 9, 29-39.
18.
Holzer, H. J. (1996). What employers want: Job prospects for less educated workers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
19.
Holzer, H. J. , Ihlanfeldt, K. R., & Sjoquist, D. L. (1994). Work, search, and travel among White and Black youth. Journal of Urban Economics, 35, 320-345.
20.
Ihlanfeldt, K. R. (1992). Job accessibility and the employment and school enrollment of teenagers. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
21.
Kain, J. F. (1968). Housing segregation, Negro employment, and metropolitan decentralization. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82, 175-197.
22.
Kenyon, D. A. (1997). Theories of interjurisdictional competition. In K. L. Bradbury, Y. K. Kodrzycki, & R. Tannenwald (Eds.), The effects of state and local public policies on economic development (pp. 13-28). Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
23.
Luce, T. F., Jr. (1994). Local taxes, public services, and the intra-metropolitan location of firms and households. Public Finance Quarterly, 22, 139-167.
24.
Lynch, R. G. (1996). Do state and local tax incentives work?Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
25.
Mattey, J. , & Spiegel, M. (1997). On the efficiency effects of tax competition for firms. The economic war among the states. Minneapolis: Minnesota Public Radio.
26.
McEntree, G. W. (1997). The problem with state bidding wars and some possible remedies. The economic war among the states. Minneapolis: Minnesota Public Radio.
27.
Michigan Bond Commission . (1977, 1982, 1987, 1992). Industrial development revenue bonds. Lansing: Michigan Department of Treasury.
28.
Michigan Department of Commerce . (1977, 1982, 1987, 1992). Local unit computerized information. Lansing: Author.
Michigan Property Tax Commission . (1977, 1982, 1987, 1992). Assessed valuation, state equalized valuation, assessment level, and S.E.V. multiplier (factor) for separately equalized classifications. Lansing: Michigan Department of Treasury.
31.
Phillips, J. M. , & Goss, E. P. (1995). The effects of state and local taxes on economic development: A meta-analysis. Southern Economic Journal, 62, 297-316.
32.
Raphael, S. (1998). The spatial mismatch hypothesis and Black youth joblessness: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. Journal of Urban Economics, 43, 79-111.
33.
Rubin, H. J. (1988). Shoot anything that flies; claim anything that falls. Economic Development Quarterly, 2, 236-251.
34.
Southeastern Michigan Council of Governments . (1990). Tax incentives/tax abatements in Southeast Michigan. Detroit: Author.
35.
Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416-424.
36.
U.S. Bureau of the Census . (1970, 1980, 1990). Characteristics of population, Michigan. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
37.
Wassmer, R. W. (1994). Can local incentives alter a metropolitan city’s economic development?Urban Studies, 31, 1251-1278.
38.
Wolman, H. (with Spitzley, D.). (1996). The politics of local economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 10, 115-150.
